2008 Archived Meeting Minutes

Click on the appropriate date to view the minutes

1-9 : 1-23 : 2-13 : 2-27 : 3-12 : 3-26 : 4-9 : 4-23 : 5-14 : 5-28 : 6-11 : 6-25 : 7-9 : 7-23 : 8-13 : 8-27 : 9-10

9-24 : 10-8 : 10-22 : 11-12 : 12-10

 

Holishor Association, Inc

Board of Directors Meeting

January 9, 2008

 

Roger Groth , President, calls meeting to order. Pledge of allegiance recited. Attendance: Board Members present, Roger Groth , David Decker , Tracy Ferguson , Paul Mormino , Scott Webber and Jim May. Approximately 5 Holishor members present.

 

Minutes of December 12, 2007

Action: Scott motions to approve, Paul seconds.

Tracy : The time of adjournment was 9:28 p.m.

Scott: Page 2, I voted no, Jim voted Yes.

Motion Carries

 

Bills & Salaries

Action: Paul motions to approve, David seconds.

Motion Carries

 

Transfers of Property

Action: Jim motions to approve, David seconds.

Motion Carries

 

Managers Report
Glenn : Lake Level is up to 16 inches, no wake is lifted. We accomplished the 319 grant program site visit and terrain walk of the North Property with the IEPA rep. Mr. Mike Bundren. Road closing date is still not set for St. James. We will post it on the website and the marquee. Christmas trees can be dropped off on the north property across from the silt pit until January 15. We are preparing for the annual audit and want it done by the end of March to permit our focus on preparation for the Annual Meeting.

 

Security Report
Rob:
4 Animal, 3 Vehicle, 3 Property, 3 Persons, and 2 Alarms. Last page is different; we are having a breakdown of 2007 & 08.

Paul: Want to mention something about the daytime break-in in Holiday Shores ?
Rob:
I can’t give specifics but there was a break-in during the day out here. I also want to say something about speeding. We have been getting calls as well as
Madison County . There was a speed trap earlier today on St. James. They will continue.
Glenn : The robbery was during the day, we advise everyone to keep a watchful eye out and if you see something suspicious please call us.

 

Website Committee Report
Art Surgant 1812:
The statistics were down again; the average for the past months was about 400-500.

Treasurers Report
Action:
Jim motions to approve, Scott seconds.

Motion Carries

 

Correspondence

Jim Bartlett 984: Request to use the ballroom for free dance lessons on Thursdays for 5 weeks.

Action: Tracy motions to approve, David seconds.

Motion Carries

 

Old Business

Swimming Pool Rule

Roger: The rule is now up to par with Madison County .
New Rule

SWIMMING POOLS:

Madison County requirements must be met.  HSBARC and Madison County building permits are required. 

 

Any pool must be on the same lot as the principle residence and its construction shall not precede the construction of such residence.

 

Setbacks: No pool may extend closer to the fronting street than the rear of the residence or an appurtenance, five feet from the primary building, or not closer to the side street property line than twenty-five (25) feet.  On “A” and “B” lots the pool must be a minimum of ten (10) feet from the rear or side property line.  On “C” lots a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet must be maintained from the water’s edge at no lower elevation than 505.0 feet MSL.

 

BELOW GRADE POOLS: Must be a minimum of ten (10’) feet from any grinder pump system.

A fence at least forty-eight (48’’) inches must surround the pool area.  The fence must comply with Holishor Association requirements.  All the access gates must be equipped with security lock system.

All setback requirements for a below grade pool are the same as for an above ground pool.

 

ABOVE OR PARTIALLY ABOVE GRADE POOLS: Must be a minimum of ten (10’) feet from any grinder pump system.

 

Any portion of the pool or its structure, deck, or platform must be a minimum of ten (10’) feet from side or rear lot line, and a minimum of thirty (30’) feet from street side property line.

There shall be an approved locking safety device on the one (1) and only access to the pool platform.  Swimming pool building permits shall be coordinated with Holiday Shores Sanitary District prior to obtaining a Madison County permit.

Action: Scott motions to approve, Paul seconds.

 

Morning Glory

Paul: Lake Management met on Monday. The recommendation from Hennigan & Associates is a concrete patch with chemical water proofing. The committee is in agreement, and our goal is to have that amount of money by the end of the year. Worst- case scenario is spring of 2009. We are going to meet again to inspect the pipe one time and then we are going to decide how often we are going to inspect it after that. Concrete and patching is the cheapest and there would be no EPA permits required. We are not using any of our people to do the inspection it will all be outside people.

Roger: What’s the ball park cost on that?
Paul: Their method is about $77,000 with a 10% contingency cost. We are looking at having more because the cost of construction and gas has gone up. This money would be for unexpected costs of inspections, emergency and draw down procedures.

David: Is the recommendation is based upon the Lake Management Committee’s conversation with Hennigan and Associates?
Paul: Yes. I believe you have a copy from them. Ray emailed me to say he agreed with it as well.
Roger:
Glenn is the staff in agreement with this?
Glenn : Yes.
Paul:
They told us if we put the cured in place PVC liner in we would never know what the pipe is doing above or below. We would never see any deterioration.

Scott: What do we currently have in reserve?

Glenn : We have $69,249 in reserves for this.

Paul: We are not to far off from achieving that goal.
Roger: We need to decide on this so the staff can get moving on it.
Paul: What they said was the first inspection $6,500 and an additional $800 for the written report. On the 21st after this we are going to talk about how often we want to do these inspections. Each inspection will cost $3,500 with an additional $800. That’s on top of the $77,000.

Roger: Have we discussed whether this will be done during the height of the boating season?
Glenn : We need to look for a level season, like July or August, where the lake level is at regular height.
Roger:
Ask them if there are any considerations on that, and a time line on when we are expected to have the $80,000. We are still ear-marking all of the initiation fees for this purpose.
Paul: The construction cost estimate for the concrete patch and the chemical waterproofing is approximately $53,000 that includes a budgetary cost of $6,000 to keep the outfall pipe dry for 144 hours. Assuming the contractor can fill the pothole water tank with water from a hydrant for their blasting and mixing process. The cost estimate for construction administration is $17,000; the 10% contingency added brings the estimate to $77,000. That’s why I want more set aside.

Conversation Ensues

Action: Paul motions to do the repair of the outfall pipe with the concrete patch and chemical waterproofing that H&A recommends to Holiday Shores , Scott seconds.

Motion Carries

 

Hennigan & Associates Bill
Action:
Paul states there is a bill for $12,000 for the investigation of the outfall pipe repair options since May of 2007 and motions that this gets paid. David seconds
Motion Carries

 

New Business

Write Off Ray & Edna Byrd

Action: Paul motions to approve write off, Tracy seconds.

Motion Carries

 

Roger: The Board has until the end of January to find a new Board Member to fill the vacancy Ray’s resignation left. We have the Nominating Committee of Larry & Nancy Dallas to come up with a list of recommendations.

 

Clubhouse Deck Fundraiser

Roger: There has been an idea of a fundraiser to be used towards building a deck on the side of the Clubhouse.
Glenn : We would have better utilization of the clubhouse. If you look out toward the docks there is nothing there. One thing we talked about was a deck projecting out toward the docks.
*Artists Conception on Projector*
Glenn : It would be approximately 30’ by 50’ and we are going to try to make it out of composite.

Roger: What does this do for the Beacon Inn?
Michelle Gagnon; Beacon Inn:
If we had a deck area that would help us. We could serve food and drinks there.
Roger:
With the no smoking law in effect do you have a smoking area?
Michelle:
I was going to just put some bistro tables more then 15’ from the doors.
Roger:
Glenn , what ideas are you and the staff thinking of?
Glenn : One of the things that drove this was of course serving food, but another was the 4th of July. The Ski Club had to set up on picnic tables and this could help them with set up. As for fundraisers we have in mind a possible Casino Night. A good date for that would be March 29th. There would be no money changing hands; you would buy play money to use. We will get a committee to help us with the planning. Another fun event would be a Celebrity Bar Tender through the Beacon. Possibly Board Members, Dan Weisner, Jimmy McCann and Angie said her and a friend could dress as bikers and do that. We have an extremely tight budget, so if we could do something that would improve the Clubhouse with fund raising, we are just looking for the opportunity to do this.

Conversation Ensues

Most of the Board believes a deck would be a good idea; they would like more information, a cost estimate and more information on the fundraiser.

Tabled till the next meeting

 

Open Floor

Michelle Gagnon; Beacon Inn reads letter to the Board requesting they remain closed until March 1st instead of February.

Roger: I want Glenn to review your lease agreement and send in the letter to the next meeting.

 

Action: Scott motions to adjourn, David seconds.

Meeting adjourns to Executive Session

8:28 pm Adjourned at – 9:16pm

 

 Submitted by Tracy Ferguson & Kellie Bechtold

Back To Top


 

Holishor Association, Inc

Board of Directors Meeting

January 23, 2008

Minutes

 

David Decker Treasurer, calls meeting to order. Pledge of allegiance recited.

 

Attendance: Board Members present,  David Decker ,  Paul Mormino , Jim May and Don Austin. Excused absence Roger Groth , Tracy Ferguson and Scott Webber Approximately 5 Holishor members present.

 

David Decker Welcomes Don Austin as our new Board Director.

 

Minutes of January 9, 2007

Action: Paul Moves, Jim Seconds

David: I don’t think that was the motion that Paul made, please check it, he thinks it should be the method of repair. Phraseology on the manager’s report, our lake is not only 16 inches deep. Under Morning Glory insert 2008 instead of Year, and it’s to talk about the next inspection

Motion Carries to approve amended minutes.

  

Transfers of Property

Action: Paul motions to approve, Jim seconds.

Motion Carries

  

Correspondence

All the letters are read by Jim May, to be discussed later.

 

Old Business

Clubhouse Deck Fundraiser

Glenn : Put together a good overview of how this money will be raised. An anonymous person has said they would donate $1000.00 for prizes. We have some members stepping forward. The only thing we are waiting on is board approval.

David: I would like the rest of the board members present, full cost including price of maintenance to build it and a copy of the new smoking rule for food services outside.

Paul: I would like an estimate from a contractor to build it.

Action: Tabled until the next meeting 

 

Correspondence Continued

Beacon Inn Letter, they would like to close down till February 29.

David: discussed meeting with Beacon and Board, asked members and did a telephone vote providing permission for this year only.

 

Ski Club: want to allow outside people into the club to increase competitiveness.

David: I’m apprehensive about this.

Jim: Personally I would like to table this until the next meeting.

Action: Tabled until the next meeting.

 

Midway PTO Trivia Night: Waiver of Ballroom Fees.

Action: Paul Motion to accept waiver of fee, Don seconds
all in favor, Motion Carries

 

New Business

Rate Increases for Clubhouse Ballroom Rentals

Items to be changed

• Price of cleaning fee from $50 to $75.

• 75 people party cost from $75 to $85
• 76-150 people party cost from $150 to $170

• 151-300 people party cost from $360 to $400

• A Security Guard fee installed of $60 for all parties with Alcohol

Discussion on Weddings on the Beach, it is public you cannot rent it, if people show up to have one there are guidelines printed in the Ballroom Rental Contract.  

David: Concerned with the wording of the Cancellation paragraph, would like that to be defined, there was a problem with the wording of it at a past meeting.  

Paul: Concerned that if he has a 25 person card party with beer that there would be a security guard present at such a small party. Doesn’t think it is necessary.

Conversation Ensues

Jim May Motions that on all contracts signed after today the cleaning fee shall be raised from $50 (fifty dollars) to $75 (seventy five dollars).

All in favor, Motion Carries

 

Don Motions that we accept or change the contract for the ballroom rental fees to the new proposed amounts to $85 for 75 people or less, $170 for 76-150 people and $400 for 151-300 people.

No Second
Fails due to lack of second

To be discussed at the next meeting

 

Tailgate Conveyor spreader for Salt or Rock.

Will help during Ice storms and the spreading of rock and asphalt on our roads.

Reserves were redistributed and is no longer available for such a purchase

Tabled

 

Polar Bear Jump: Planned by the Social Committee & Larry and Nancy Dallas

David: Board doesn’t get into the matters of the Social Committee. I think I would like to recommend that the Social committee or the individuals planning the event submit their ideas to the board.

 

David: There is an executive session after the meeting for Personnel and legal issues.

 

Jim Motions to adjourn to Executive session, Don seconds

Motion Carries

Meeting Adjourns 9:00 p.m.

 

Submitted by Glenn Dalton and Kellie Bechtold

 

Note: The minutes are a summary of the meetings; the only items that are verbatim are the motions. If you wish to hear the meeting in full you may come to the office and listen to the meeting via digital recording.

Back To Top


 

Holishor Association, Inc

Board of Directors Meeting

February 13, 2008

Minutes

 

Scott Webber Vice President, calls meeting to order. Pledge of allegiance recited.

 

Attendance: Board Members present, Scott Webber, David Decker,  Paul Mormino , Jim May and Don Austin. Excused absence Roger Groth , Tracy Ferguson Approximately 9 Holishor members present.

 

Scott: Glad to see such a big crowd for our first meeting. Roger Groth and Tracy Ferguson has and excused absence tonight. So I do commit this will be the fastest board meeting.

 

Minutes of January 23, 2007

Action: Paul motions to approve, David seconds

Motion carries.

  

Transfers of Property

Action: David motions to approve, Jim seconds

Motion carries

David: Glenn and I has a conversation regarding the numbers that are on the bottom of this report. I think wa re going to talk about maybe a different way to come up with the numbers in regard to how many new members and what the fees are, because even after he explained it to me twice, I still don’t understand.

Conversation Ensues

 

Scott: Profit and loss budget. Is that just for our viewing pleasure?

David: Informational.

Scott: The question I did have is on 2008 dues and assessments, does that say we have collected 51 percent?

Glenn: Yes it does

Conversation Ensues

 

Manager’s Report

Given by Glenn Dalton

 

Security Report

Given by Glenn Dalton

 

Website Committee Report

Given by Art Surgant 1812

 

Treasures Report

David: Is nonexistent. We are looking at revising the data and how we are pulling that together. In previous times we were pulling the numbers from the bank accounts, which had a tendency to overstate our operating fund because we had funds that were committed but didn’t show decreased out of that account. So what we are looking at doing is revising that and pulling out Quick Book balances from our checking accounts and our bank balances from our reserve accounts and that will give us a truer picture, in my opinion, of the financial status of the association. And I am currently working with the office to put that procedure in place.

Scott: Thank you, David. We didn’t have any correspondence. So we will move on to old business. I wasn’t here last week so you guys are going to have to help me out. First thing is the deck fund raiser. And it’s my understanding we need a motion to establish the committee to begin putting fund raisers together.

 

Old Business

Deck Fundraiser

David: What we had approved, I guess two meetings ago, was the general concept of creating committees and/or setting up processes to do fund raisers for specific assets within the association. What we didn’t do was approve specifically the idea of creating a deck over here. So you are absolutely right.

David motions that we authorize and create a committee with a charter to raise funds to create a deck at the clubhouse, a one time thing.

David: I just want to say I like the idea of building the deck. I like the idea of creating a committee to coordinate and organize it. I just think it will be a good addition and I like the procedure.

Don seconds, motion carries

 

Ski Club: Change in Ski Club Bylaw

Recap of what happened last meeting.

David: Michael had requested that we do a change to the bylaws which allows non members of the association to be members of the ski club. I think he’s got better wording than what I just said. But they had to be previous members of the ski club, as you can see from the copy of this letter. We did read the letter into the minutes. And at that time we had tabled it, wanting to get a larger group of the board here for that conversation. I would say it’s not the large representation we had hoped for, but I am more than willing to go ahead and move forward with it. I don’t know about the rest of the board

Conversation Ensues

Scott: For now it doesn’t go forward without a motion.

Conversation ensues

Tabled until next meeting

 

Polar Bear Plunge
Scott:
Next subject, we talked about the polar bear plunge. But through this ski club thing I notice one of the rules says that all fund raising events that are to take place must be submitted to the board of directors for approval. I don’t think we want to be in the business of approving fund raisers for all the committees. I think in talking with Gerry, I think I understand why it was put in place. Gerry do you want to share?

Conversation Ensues

 

Ballroom Rental contract

Scott: Moving on, ballroom rental rate change and cancellation verification. It’s my understanding you guys approved the cleaning fees, but we had questions about the contract changes and the new costs. So David, Paul, do you guys want to take this one up?

David: At the last meeting we walked through quite a bit of the contract in great painful detail for all those involved. We had a motion to approve the rate increase. It died for lack of a second. There was a lot of confusion and conversation regarding the cancellation fees and what the amounts would be. I think Glenn has provided some examples within the documentation that we have here of what those fees would be. At this point I would be willing to submit the motion that Don had made at the last meeting to approve the rate increases in an effort to break that piece away from all the other conversations and if we want to decide on whether or not we are going to charge for security, or require security for alcohol events, or if we want to allow the 85 dollar additional fee or any of that, I would just as soon work through the things. In particular, I like to work through things piecemeal. Take one segment of an issue, work it, resolve it, so that they all don’t get tangled up.  

David motions that we accept or change the contract for the ballroom rental fees to the new proposed amounts to $85 for 75 people or less, $170 for 76-150 people and $400 for 151-300 people.

Don seconds motion carries

Scott: So that is the only motion we are accepting is the new fee structure.

Conversation Ensues

Scott: So Dave, we are done. Is there a way to maybe send a statement to Kellie on your proposed refund deal, so that we can have the existing one and then what is being proposed?

Conversation Ensues

Tabled until next meeting

 

New Business

Scott: New business. You should have gotten the latest copy of the open letter going in the Holiday Times concerning sale of association owned lots. Seven lots have been identified, and prices have been established. And so this is going into the March Holiday Times.

Letter to membership on North Property Purchase and sell of Association Lots

Ok to print in Holiday Times

 

1050 Bermuda Write off

Scott: My understanding is we don’t have a choice with foreclosure. So I will entertain a motion to approve the write-off.

Paul motions to approve, Don seconds

Discussion

Motion retracted

 

Association Insurance Bill through Grant Bullis

It is a yearly fee

David motions to approve, Don seconds
Motion Carries

 

Morning Glory Reserve Expense

Paul motions that the twelve thousand dollars comes out of the morning glory reserve fund, David Seconds

Motion Carries

 

Beach Emergency Phones

Scott: Reading Glenn’s letter to us it seems as though we had an annual budget of the AT&T pay phones of 3000 Dollars a year. AT&T has sold those phones. And so we have a choice to go with a new carrier or go as I understand it with a button speaker phone that ties directly to 911. Glenn lists the first years cost savings of about 227 to go with that. The remaining years will save us about 2200 dollars a year going that rout.

Conversation Ensues

Paul motions to approve the purchase of the beach emergency phones, Don seconds

Motion Carries

 

 

David Motions to adjourn to executive session, Paul seconds

Motion carries

Meeting Adjourns 10:00p.m.

 

Scott Webber Meeting Reconvenes at 10:36

Paul motions to approve $5812.44 to Byron, Gerber, Petrie and Caleb PTL, David seconds

Motion carries

 

David Motions to adjourn, Paul seconds

Motion Carries

Meeting Adjourns at 10:37

 

Submitted by Glenn Dalton and Kellie Bechtold

Back To Top


 

Holishor Association, Inc.

Board of Directors Meeting

February 27, 2008

Minutes

 

Roger Groth President calls the meeting to order. Pledge of Allegiance recited.

 

Roger: I have things to add and subtract, I want to add a Treasurer’s report and we will talk about the Ballroom Rental contract, we will also be talking about the 2009 budget.

 

Attendance: Board members present, Roger Groth, David Decker, Tracy Ferguson, Jim May, Paul Mormino and Don Austin. Excused Absence Scott Webber, approximately 6 Holishor members were present.

 

Minutes of February 13, 2008

Action: Jim motions to approve, David seconds.

David: A couple of discussions were left out sometimes we get detail minutes and sometimes we get condensed minutes. I want the board members to have specific details that they have in the minutes, like with the ballroom contract. I want the members to know that I was against the way the cancellation fees are currently written in the contract and we are penalizing certain types of rentals based on our methodology.
Roger: Do you think we should go ahead and rework them?

David: Yes.

Conversation Ensues 

Motion fails due to lack of votes. Glenn and Jim will revise minuets.

 

Transfers of Property

Action: David motions to approve, Jim seconds.

Motion Carries

 

Treasures Report

Given by David Decker

Roger: We sold a lot in 07 and one in 08 the question we had for ourselves is should we be making a principal payment or an annual payment for the North Property. We have asked Joyce Kirby to take a look at that. Our annual audit is underway and part of that process is that the audit firm interviews one of the officers. I thought that last year the audit firm told us that the board should be paying more attention to the accounts receivable. I ask them this time what they meant by that. He said that we approve the bills and salaries every month and we should be looking at the accounts receivable too. David and I will be working with Angie and Joyce to get something up for us to look at.

Action: Paul motions to approve, Tracy seconds.

 Motion Carries

 

Correspondence

Thank you letter from Midway PTO: Tracy reads

 

Old Business

Ski Club Members

David: The Ski Club is requesting a change in the rule to allow non-members of Holiday Shores to become members of the Ski Club.

Mike Bell 1685: We are asking an amendment to that rule to allow past members of the Ski Club that still have ties to the community be allowed to compete with us in competition.

Roger: Why was it tabled?
David: We asked that it be looked into and see if they could identify what was behind the change in the rules to begin with. 

Glenn: We could not identify anyone that had any knowledge of that.

David: We also wanted good representation of the board and we wanted the history.

Mike: We have not been able to track down a rhyme or reason as to why it was put down in the first place. In no way are we trying to bring in people from the outside and giving those people rights and privileges to the lake. We are trying to establish a competition club. We are not asking this to be an open door policy; we want to invite 5-6 past members back to compete.

Roger: What does membership in the Ski Club really mean?

Mike: Members pay a fee and they join the insurance.

Roger: Would they operate boats or bringing additional watercrafts?

Mike: No.

Tracy : Do any other clubs allow outside people?

Mike: I don’t know but the Ski Club is the only one that has this rule spelled out.

Tracy : What is the direct benefit of having more people? Do you get money at competitions?

Mike: When we get to these competition levels in state most of them are not restricted to a community. We are looking as if we go up there to represent Holiday Shores we want the best people that we can have.

Jeanie Votruba: In order for people to compete in the competitions they have to be on the roster or they cannot compete. That’s what they are asking.

Conversation Ensues

Roger: Would it meet your needs for us to sign off on a one year waiver stating that non members with ties to the community, that would not be allowed to drive a boat, to compete in the ski club?

Mike: Yes.
Chris Getsfred 687: Mike’s proposal would bring in a mix of members that would allow the kids that used to have to sit on the shore during the 4th of July Ski Club to participate.

Conversation Ensues

Roger: You are going to have to submit in writing what the schedule would be to include non-competition members, and all the specifications for the proposed outside members.

Tabled until next meeting

 

1050 Bermuda Write off

Action: Paul motions to approve, Jim seconds.

Motion Carries

 

David: I did find a note here at the last meeting there was some discussion about the Polar Bear Plunge. There is a rule that states that all fundraiser events that take place must be submitted to the Board for approval. The general consensus is that we probably want to reserve the right to identify a fundraiser that the association doesn’t want to be associated with.

Roger: How do we know when something is a fundraiser? The New Years Dance, if they make more money than they spent is that a fundraiser? We approve the Walk Run, and the Fishing Tournament.

David reads Scott’s Fundraiser information into the minutes.

Conversation Ensues

Roger: Where are we with Casino Night?
David: What we approved at the last meeting was the establishment of a committee to raise funds for that. We made it clear that the committee would be doing those efforts.

Jeanie Votruba 493: I would like to ask the board of directors to approve us having the Casino Night on March 29 to raise money for the deck that will be a benefit to the community.

Action: Jim motions to approve Casino Night, Paul seconds.

Tracy, Paul, Jim, Don vote Yes, David votes No.

Motion Carries

 

Jeanie Votruba draws the winners name for the Dues and Assessments refund.

Winners are David K. and Sheryl Hartnett

 

Roger: I handed out the schedules for the 2009 Annual Meeting.

 

2009 Budget

 

Discussions over the Budget areas of Morning Glory Reserves, Roads and Security were the main topics. Concerns about no monies being assigned to the North Property was also noted. Roger asked that Board Members get back to him with their ideas on how to allocate the Morning Glory Reserves. 

 

Paul motions to adjourn Don seconds. 

Meeting adjourns at 10:00 p.m.

 

Submitted by Tracy Ferguson and Kellie Bechtold

Back To Top


 

Holishor Association, Inc.

Board of Directors Meeting

March 12, 2008

Minutes

 

Roger Groth , president, calls meeting to order:  Pledge of Allegiance recited

 

Attendance: Board Members, Roger Groth , Tracy Ferguson , Jim May , David Decker , Paul Mormino , and Don Austin. Scott Webber is excused.

Approximately 5 Holishor Members present.

 

Minutes of February 13, 2008

Action: David motions to approve, Jim seconds.

David: Likes having more detail in the minutes.

Motion Carries

 

Minutes of February 27, 2008

Action: David motions to approve, Don seconds.

Roger: Wants sentence added to final discussion of the 2009 budget to read the purpose of this discussion is to lead the Board to approval of the budget to be submitted to the membership for approval at the Annual Meeting.

Motion Carries

 

Bills & Salaries

Action: Paul motions to approve, Tracy seconds.

Roger: The Board will be looking at and approving accounts receivable in the future.

Motion Carries

 

Treasurers Report

David: Balances as of Feb. 29th. To get a better picture of what our availability is we changed the checking portions to be coming from Quick Books as opposed to the bank balances.

Action: Paul motions to approve, Jim seconds.

Motion Carries

 

Profit Loss Budget

David: They are in a different order than the proposed budget we are presenting. A line seems to be missing in regards to the reserve interest expense. We will have Angie look into it.

 

Transfers of Property

Action: Jim motions to approve, David seconds.

Motion Carries

Paul: What are the initiation fees compared to last year?
Glenn : They are up significantly.

 

Manager’s Report

Given by Glenn Dalton

 

Security Report

Given By Glenn Dalton

             

Jeannie Votruba 493:concern over sledding by the dam. Thought there was not to be any activity like that near the dam  .

Jim Perroti 1406: May have to relight any pilot light after the installation.

 

Correspondence

Gene Kelting Lot 491: Letter questioning port-a-potties taken from beaches for winter
Action: Tracy read letter. No formal action needed.
Glenn will take care of.

           

Old Business

Ski Club Membership

Mike Bell 1685 & Chris Getsfred 687 are recognized by the Board.

Roger: This has been discussed for the past 3 meetings, the letter answers any questions we had and I’m willing to entertain a motion.

Action: Jim motions that the Holiday Shores Ski Club be granted a one year trial period during which time they will provide the names of those they invite back as well as monthly reports as to any issues comments or concerns that may arise. Paul seconds.

Gerry Theodor e 1346: I do support the ski club, and I have no opposition to them but I want to know if there was a consideration of any type of a fee being charged to these people that would be allowed back into the Ski Club?

Roger: No, not at this time.

Jim, Don and Paul vote yes. David and Tracy vote no.

Motion Carries

 

2009 Proposed Budget

Roger: Recommends we provide the 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 accrual, 2008 revised as well as the 2009 to the membership for reference. To present prior year’s history to the membership through sub-categories, not line item details.

Discuss changes of the proposed 2009 budget including the Income Category with interest and non reserve accounts increased. The franchise fee was increased. In the Expense Category, the two postage entries adjusted down. The Utilities Category was increased. This budget proposes moving the initiation fee proposed for 2009 in its entirety to the road surfacing aspect of the budget. Some funds allocated in the Dredging Category shifted over to Security. Monies for the North Property principal and interest payments and revenue source for the sale of lots to offset cost of the North Property have also been allocated. Proposal of a one time $25.00 Special Assessment... All of the special Assessment fees would be allocated to the North Property for “seed money” toward the 319 Grant.

Conversation Ensues

Action: David motions that the proposed budget presented to the Board is what will be presented to the members at the Annual Meeting 2008. Jim seconds.

Roger: Budget will be presented by condensing detailed line items into categories. The Public Safety and Security programs to be reviewed 6 to 8 months from now.

Motion Carries 

  New Business

Options for income of the sale of two lots as it relates to payment of principal and or interest on the North Property loan.

David: Options for utilizing the lot sales. Income for lot sales is $24,000.00. Options for using these funds are (A) to put it into a CD or leave it in a money market to gain interest on it then make the payment when it is due at the end of the year. Or (B) We can take the money and pay against the principal, which would mean coming up with the interest payment at the end of the year. The interest due at the end of this year will be an estimate of $26,000.00. If we choose to pay on the principal now and we do not sell enough lots to cover the interest, we would have to borrow against the 2009 budget.

Conversation Ensues

Roger: Another option would be to use some of the money to pay towards the principal, leaving the rest to invest for the interest portion of the loan at the end of the year.

Tracy: I think option (A) would be better with the real estate market. as it stands today.

Don: Likes option (B) Questions how much money would we save buy paying on the principal.

Roger: About $700.00.

Paul: The interest from the reserve accounts stay in the reserve accounts? It can never be moved to pay for this?

David: Past policy has been; interest in the reserves stays in the reserves and is allocated among the items in the reserves. That is our inflation facture.

Action: David motions that we hold the net proceeds of lot sales and invest to use as the interest payment and any future sales this year are immediately applied toward the principle of the loan. Paul seconds.

Motion Carries

Foreclosure Write-Off: Randall Klaus

Action: David motions to approve the write off for $2,147.82, Tracy seconds.

Motions Carries

 

Lawn Tractor Bid

Glenn : We budgeted last year to purchase a new tractor this year. We have 3 bids before you that are a significant. Everything that comes with it is listed.

Paul: How much was in the reserve?
David: $10,850.00

Don: Is there a snow blade?

Jim Peroti 1406: Snow Blade comes with it. It is about a $12,000 tractor.

Don: I have this tractor, it’s great.

Tracy: Is there warrantee information on the used tractor?

Jim Perroti 1406: No.

David: Are the other two new units?

Jim: Yes

David: It doesn’t look like they have the additional equipment as the used one does

Jim Peroti 1406: The other ones are lawn tractors that are just a step above residential.

Roger: How much do we have in reserve for a single item?

David: We have $8,400.00 for (2) units. 

Conversation Ensues

Action: David motions that we authorize the purchase of one riding mower from reserves, Paul seconds.
Motion Carries.  

Action: David motions that we purchase the Simplicity Legacy Mower as recommended by the office staff for $6390.67, Don seconds.

Motion Carries

 

Conversation covering possible purchase of a new truck this year.

 

Operation Clean Sweep

Tracy Reads, no action required

 

Farming – North Property

Glenn : We have a request from Steve Engelkey, a neighboring farmer, to share crop small portions in the north section of the newly acquired North Property. It amounts to 5 acres, and is not considered to be an impediment to our silt retention operation.

Roger: I don’t think there are any erosion problems to consider up in that area. Glenn you can work with him on that and the share cropping.

Meet the Candidates night

April 11, 2008 is the scheduled date; Scott will be there in place of Roger. 

 

3% cost of living By-Law

Roger: This is to see if we want to consider a 3% cost of living change to the bylaw. This has been floating on and off through the years with the board. I’m not sure what my personal belief is on this, the proposal is that we put a bylaw to the membership that would increase the assessments every year by 3% and this is based on the SSI amount.

Don: Do we want to limit this to 3%; or just put it down at Cola?

Roger: If you’re looking at just the Social Security Index, using the average because the index is published in October you are building a budget for the following year about then... Then you are putting the budget before the members that following May, it gets a little awkward having a different figure. That’s why Ray came up with an average.

Paul: Does this affect the initiation fees?
Roger: No, just assessments.

Paul: But the initiation fees are the current assessments amount.

Roger: In effect yes it does that, but this is just worded for the assessments.

Conversation Ensues

Roger: We could put this before the membership as a “Straw Vote” just to see what they think of it, because we are going to have a budget problem in 2010.

David: I think that is a good Idea.

Conversation Ensues

David: I’m suggesting that we put this on the Annual Meeting agenda as a discussion Item.
Roger:
I want to put this in the agenda packets as a by-law change, but for a “Straw Vote” basically a vote that will not count for anything but a poll.

Votes are non binding, no motion needed.

 

Open Floor

 

Action: Don motions to adjourn to executive session, David seconds.

Motion carries

Meeting Adjourns at 9:45

Executive Meeting adjourns at 10:10

 

Submitted by Tracy Ferguson and Kellie Bechtold 

Back To Top


 

Holishor Association, Inc.

Board of Directors Meeting

March 26, 2008

 

Roger Groth , President, calls the meeting to order, 7:30 p.m. The Pledge of Allegiance is recited.

Attendance: Roger Groth , David Decker , Tracy Ferguson , Scott Webber , Jim May , Don Austin and Paul Mormino . Approximately 5 Holishor members were present.

 

Minutes of March 12, 2008

Action: David motions to approve, Scott seconds.

Motion Carries

 

Transfers of Property

Action: David motions to approve, Paul seconds.

Jim: Did one of our lots sell?

Roger: We have a contract.

Motion Carries

 

Treasurers Report

Given by David Decker

Action: Jim motions to approve, Tracy seconds.

Motion Carries

 

Correspondence

Madison Communications Rate Change: Tracy Reads

Glenn : The contract doesn’t state we can negotiate prices with them. The increase is only about $4.00

No action needed

 

Old Business

Ballroom Contract change

David: I’m focusing strictly on the rental rates and refund rates. The current contract you have a three hundred twenty five dollar deposit which includes a two hundred fifty dollar security deposit damage deposit and a seventy-five dollar cleaning fee. The refund is based upon the percentage of that original deposit. Depending on how many people you have at your event is what your rental cost would be. So, an individual who was originally going to have to pay eighty-five dollars to rent the room would be penalized the same amount of money of someone that was going to have to pay four hundred dollars to rent the room. They would actually have to end up paying more if they canceled the rental then if they actually booked the room. As I have said in previous meetings I have a real issue with that. After several different ideas, I have a proposal that Scott gave to me. He identified some amounts and gave those to me. I took those amounts and tweaked them to a more even distribution.

David: So the proposal is that the refund rates would be a percentage of your actual rental rate. Using the same sliding scale that we had before as far as the number of days of notification then rounded the numbers to even numbers. If I have the small group under 75 my actual rental cost is Eighty -five dollars, if I cancel prior to ninety days I loose $25.00, 89-60 I loose $35.00, 59-30 days I loose $55.00 and less than 30 days its $85.00. So I’m not actually loosing any more money then it would have taken to rent the ballroom. What I’m not keeping is any portion of what I would call pass through costs. I’m not keeping a portion of the cleaning fees, not keeping any portion of the security fees and definitely not keeping any portion of the damage deposits. All I did was build that as a sliding scale. I’m not penalizing anybody more then what they would have paid. If somebody wants to cancel it that’s fine we have the opportunity to rent it to somebody else. As a side note to this there is a discussion as to what the deposit should be, which is what I think should be a separate discussion.

Roger: Let’s stick with the issue of the refunds right now.
Scott: I just want to say that the two differences, is that I’m giving a little more back to the member, I think we are encouraging the member to get out as quickly as possible but the association is getting their money if they are not out within 30 days. So in both plans we get the $85, the $170 and the $400.

Roger: Ok, just for the record I want to compare, and we will use Dave’s proposal to the current. Dave you’re proposing that if there is any canceling there is a cost to the member?

David: Yes
Roger: At the present time we do not charge the member anything if they cancel 90 days or earlier?
David: That is correct. The reason behind that is we are going through the effort of going through the paperwork of the contract if we have to do a refund we have to cut the check, sign the check, all the paperwork in accounting that’s going along with it. In addition to that, if somebody has booked the room for a Saturday night and 90 days before the event they cancel there is a significant possibility that there were a number of people that wanted to use that room for that night.

Roger: Let me go on to another major difference. At the present time regardless of the size of your gathering if you give us a short  term cancellation, under 30 days, you pay $325?

David: That’s correct

Roger: Under your model it would be dependent on the number of people. The downside to this is that if were to adopt this and we see that we begin to have an increase in the small number of gatherings that are canceled then we are going to have a revenue drain. So that’s the only downside that I can see to this thing, that’s what the higher fee structure seem to be doing as best I can determine, why would it have been set the way it was, it seems to me that a board said that the value of this facility is X to this association. So there seems to be a logic there that you’re altering with your proposal.

David: The one contradiction that I would give to that is that an individual with a smaller gathering would actually have to pay more to cancel the event then they would if they actually utilized it.
Roger: I understand. Can we separate this out to call for a vote?
David; I want to add the discussion regarding the contract states I believe in the actual proposal states that if they want to rent the room for the previous night that they have to pay the minimal $85 rental fee.
Roger: I don’t understand that can you restate it?

David: In the new contract if they want to reserve the ballroom the day before for decorations, they can do so by renting it for $85. At no additional fees, cleaning fees or security fees associated with that. When we get to that discussion I think there is also you need to consider the penalties as part of that $85 also.

Roger; You’re saying it would be treated as two separate rentals? And it would be treated as two separate cancellations.

David: Yes, for example, if I rent it on Saturday and I reserve it on Friday my total rental cost is going to be $485. $400 for the 300 people and $85 for the reserve of the room, if I cancel that prior to having the actual gathering I would pay based on this sliding scale on both of those rentals.
Paul: I thought there was something in there that says if there is not an event on that Friday evening that the ballroom can be rented at $85?
Glenn : That’s correct unless it’s already booked.

Paul: I can go in there and say I want it for Friday and Saturday?
Roger: Only if it’s not already committed.

Paul: Isn’t that stupid on our part giving up one night for $85 and one for full price?
Scott: If he pays the $85.00 then he’s already booked it. We’re not going to double book it.
Paul: That’s what I’m looking at. We’re giving it up if someone wants to book it for a big function.

Roger; You’re right but you have that same issue for any small function regardless of what it’s for.

Paul: I don’t like that $85.00 charge.
David: That is part of the new contract language. We’ll address it. I want to make sure that when we start talking about that, we incorporate that into whatever we do for the other deposits. So it’s across the board equal.

Roger: Are you ready to make a motion on the cancellation policy?
David: I am.

Action: David would propose that we adopt per documented here under Dave’s Proposal the new cancellation policy per this document, Don seconds.
Roger: Kellie we need to include this box to the motion in the minutes.
Kellie: When the reserve the ballroom is I still taking the $325?

David: We haven’t discussed deposits yet.

Kellie: Ok I was just wondering if that was in that one or not.
David: No, this is strictly the refund Policy.

Kellie: Ok
Roger; It’s the top box so we don’t need the percentages with it.

Dave’s Proposal

Rental Cost

85.00

170.00

400.00

Notification Days

Cost to Member if Canceling

>90

25.00

50.00

100.00

89-60

35.00

75.00

175.00

59-30

55.00

110.00

260.00

<30

85.00

170.00

400.00

 

Roger: Glenn I want to ask a question regarding this. It would seem to me there’s no real change in ease of administration with the way you are doing this now, am I correct in that assumption?

Glenn : Yes.
Roger: Board members are there any question on this?

Scott: I’m strongly in favor of this change by the way, but if you ever go to change the contract again you’re going to have to change everything because this is all reflective upon the $85, $170 and $400.

Don: Do you want to leave the percentages in?

Paul: If we change the price of the rental cost it will change everything?

Scott:  No, if you go with a fixed fee, $25, $35 $55 we based that off the $85 charge. So 4 years from now if the board comes back to this and pushes this to $100, your still looking at the previous 4 years, they are going to have to come in and either adopt the percentage or change the fixed fee.

David: I don’t think you want to do percentages, and then you are going to end up refunding Dollars and Cents. You’re absolutely right. If the Board changes the rental, they are going to have to change this portion of the contract.

Glenn : The only thing the staff would request is the rational behind this so if were queried, we can do it and we don’t want to read anything into it we just want to read the rational.

David: I think we’ve been through that in enough meetings where if you don’t understand it now there are plenty of minutes you can go back to.

Motion Carries

 

David: The Deposit: There are two thoughts in regards to the deposit; I don’t know which is my proposal at this point. The simple way to do this is you don’t charge anymore of a deposit than what your rental fee is. So if I’m going to rent the ballroom and my potential penalty is $85.00 then I require an $85.00 deposit. That also makes the accounting and book keeping simpler. I think it’s a lot easier, potentially easier to explain. I will say though, it means that we don’t have that money in the bank drawing interest during that period of time. Currently I require $325 .00, I throw that in the bank if somebody’s booking that a year ahead then I’ve got that $325.00 sitting in that bank for a year, so there is a down side to only requiring the rental fee as the deposit. That’s one proposal, whatever the rental cost is, that’s the deposit.

Roger: With that proposal, when do you envision that security cleaning things would be paid?

David: I believe that currently in our contract we require any outstanding monies to be paid two weeks before the actual event.

Roger: And if its not?

David: If its not, they don’t get the rental.

Roger: If its not it’s a cancellation. That’s the point I’m getting to.

David: I’d assume that’s what we do now. So I would say yes.

Roger: The way were doing it now is the cancellation is all those monies that we had.

David: The difference is, if they cancel I will still have all the money that I would have made from that. What I don’t have is my damage deposit. We could move that ahead. We could say it has to be here a month. We could say that the damage deposit needs to be made when they make the original. I’m really open on this.

Roger: Here’s my concern with it. There’s a side of me that looks at this ballroom and says, we all own it we all want good access to use it. If we make it to easy to reserve it $85.00 twelve months in advance, the way I operate I wouldn’t remember in 3 months that I paid that $8500, let alone 12 months. It just seems to me that perhaps we are making it to easy to hold that Ballroom at the expense of any other member who wanted to use it. I think you’ve put in some nice equity with that motion we just passed as to how much we actually keep. But to me, this facility can be used for those large events and I think we ought to make people be firm enough in their intention to use it. Don’t make it to easy not to use it so that if it blocks the rest of us from taking advantage of it. If were holding someone’s money in earnest of the deal I don’t think to bad about that.
David: I think I heard you say, you would like to have a deposit higher?

Roger: Yes.

David: I would say if you want to make it clean and across the board, you make the deposit $400.00.

Roger: That’s more consistent where I’m thinking on it.

Scott: My thought was collect the whole amount so instead of the $325.00  its collect the $725.00 in advance so were in a position where if they cancel in 30 days they still owe us $75.00 based on the way we are going at it now, the way I understand it. I would prefer to get everything upfront and then give them the money back when the event concludes or whenever the cancellation fee and take it out of that. I do believe it needs to be at least the $400.00 amount because that’s the highest count.

David: The advantage of requiring the money all up front is the office would be dealing with it basically twice. Once when they sign the contract and once when they either cancel it or after the event is over.

Roger: You would handle it three times if you were to do it the other way, Don and that’s if your going to get the deposit and then two weeks prior to the event your going to get the remainders of the money the security and that and then to close it out after the event that’s three transactions for the office as opposed to two, if we take the whole thing up front, instead of a second billing. I can see problems with that ie;”oh Ill stop by and pay that”, or does the office have to remind them its due?

David: What do we do now, do we send out notifications?

Kellie; Whenever I book the ballroom I automatically print an invoice that I put with their contract and about a month prior to the event I send them an invoice. Two weeks prior to the event if I don’t have it I call them and if I don’t hear anything back we put a security guard upstairs and they are not allowed to enter.

Paul: How many times has that happened?
Kellie: Never
David: At least once.
Kellie: At least once. Over the course of me working here it has never happened.

Tracy : As far as getting that security deposit up front, that $400.00. If we do that then they cancel is that also deducted? It wouldn’t be currently because we don’t get that up front.
David: Currently we do. We get $325 and the refund is based upon a percentage of that. to give you an example I guess the proposal would be that if I were to charge a $400 deposit and I’m going to use the example of the smallest one the $85 rental, if I cancel that prior to 90 days before hand you are going to write me a check for $375 dollars because my cost, my penalty for not using the ballroom is $25.00. So my refund would be $375.00.

Tracy : I’m still not following completely, is that the $400.00 just to rent the ballroom?

David: The $400 is a Deposit.

Roger: It’s a reservation Fee. It’s best to be named a reservation fee for purposes of this discussion.

Tracy : So it would be included in the cancellation percentage?

David: No, the cancellation amounts are fixed. Just as they are shown in that chart, What My cancellation fee and has nothing to do with how much I’m putting down as my reservation fee.

Roger: So Dave, began this whole discussion with your not sure which one to propose?

David: Yes, I’ve heard 3 proposals thrown out here. One is the reservation fee is the rental fee. That would be depending on how many people 85, 170 or 400. A second proposal that I’ve heard is a flat $400.00, regardless of how many people. And the third proposal that I’ve heard is your full reservation fee is your full rental and additional costs and safety deposit. Which if I had my old chart I could tell you what that would be.

Scott: $410. $495, $725

David: It would be more if I have security. You have to add all those fees in

Roger: There are two security things you are speaking of, one is a security deposit or a damage deposit and the second is to pay the security guard. So you figured those into your numbers?
Scott: I did not figure that in.

David: A different way to say it is it would be the rest of the money you would have owed the two weeks beforehand.

Scott: Correct.

David: When you sign the contract you have to pay the cleaning fee, the security deposit, if you sign for a security guard for a total amount.
Roger: Will somebody quickly give me those three amounts. The full amount that would be the rental, the damage deposit, and cleanup and security guard if it’s required.

Scott: What’s the security charge?

Roger; $60.00

Kellie: You know that the security guard fee is included in the $400.00 for the 300 people, or the 151-300 people right?

Paul: It’s automatic.

Kellie: The 151-300 that $400.00 includes the security guard fee. So you don’t have to add an additional $60 into that.

Paul: Only on the other two?

David: Are you sure?

Kellie: Yeah I’m sure, that’s how it has always been.

Roger: You don’t have the security guard on the lowest one.
David: I want to go back as to wither the security guard fee is included on the $400.

Kellie: Yes it is.

David: I’m sorry, but I don’t believe that was part of the conversation that I had when we originally did these amounts. It is required that you have a security guard but now your telling me that the $60.00 for the security guard is also included in the $400.00? So my actual rental fee is $340.00?

Kellie: I guess so. It was included in the original one so when I redid the prices I included it since it was required for the rental amount, it’s in there.

David: So we are using the wrong numbers.

Scott: $325.00 includes the deposit and the cleaning, plus $85.00 is $410.00 plus the security is $470.00.
Kellie; But the 75 & under doesn’t require a security guard, they would have to hire one and that would be up to them, there is no requirement to have one.
Scott: It’s $410.00 unless they hire a security guard, the next one is $495.00 provided they do not hire a security guard, the next one is $725.00 and includes the security guard of $60.00.

Roger: So at the present time all I pay up front as a reservation fee is $325.00 regardless. So if this were to be the proposal is that were significantly increasing the reservation fee or deposit or whatever we want to call it.

Scott: Yes.
Roger; Is there someone who wishes to make a motion on changing the reservation deposit amounts?

Action: Scott motions to move the reservation fees to $325.00 plus the rental cost of the ballroom.
David: That’s a 4th proposal.
Scott: No that’s $325.00 plus the $85.00 that’s $410.00 so $325.00 the initial deposit plus the rental cost would equal the new deposit. David seconds.
Glenn : What’s that going to do to the high end? That’s going to be what?
Scott: $725.00
Glenn : The thing I would like to throw out there is looking at the demographics of our community I think that’s a lot of money for people to put out up front.

Paul: I myself initially like the $400.00 proposal.

Glenn : I like that It would be very workable
Roger: Ok I have a motion and a second, if you feel you like the $400.00 proposal better then vote nay on this one.
Don: In regards to the $60.00 for the guard that has to be here, It’s included in some of these but it’s not included in the smaller quantity, is that correct?
Glenn : It’s because the smaller quantities do not require a security guard.

Don: But if we have alcohol involved at all they are still required?

Kellie: No, you guys never voted on that.
Glenn : That is a part of this, we are requesting that if there’s alcohol involved a security guard should be present.

Roger: But the board has not yet approved that.

Kellie: The Board has not approved that.
Don: Well these fees were in the other ones.

David: I’m still looking at the contract. It reads that an additional fee of $60.00 is assessed for any function of 150 or more guests. I don’t see anywhere in this contract that states it’s included in this rental. If that’s the procedure that you guys have been doing it doesn’t match our contract.
Roger: That’s probably a correct statement.
Paul: It just needs a little typographical help.

Roger: Ok let me call for a vote on the motion that’s before us and that’s for the deposit reservation fee $325.00 plus the cost of rental. That would equate to $410.00, $495.00 and $725.00. Any further discussion before I call for a vote on the motion?

David: I would like to see it as a flat fee, just simple administration capabilities.

Roger: All in favor of the motion say Aye.
Scott: Aye
Roger: Opposed
David, Jim, Don, Tracy, Paul: Nay

Roger: Ok that motion fails, would someone like to give us a flat fee proposal?

Action: Paul motions that the reservation fee for any ballroom event be a flat $400.00 payable at the time of reservation, Jim seconds.

David: Roger earlier you were saying that you wanted to make sure that it was a quality amount, I’ll use that term. Your opinion, $400.00 is it high enough?
Roger: My opinion is that I didn’t think there was much wrong with the way it’s been done. So that you know I didn’t really get into this whole discussion that much quite frankly I just didn’t want to see it lowered to a dominions amount that would be easily forgotten, resulting in to many cancellations to be dealt with. That’s all that I was interested in, the different in $325.00 it is and $400 .00 it would be if this resolution passed is not a significant enough difference to sway me away from it to put it that way if that answers your question.
Paul: The maximum amount of rental costs is $400.00 this day. If they do cancel in less than 30 days we do have that in that hand if they walk away that we have that in our pocket. 
David: I want to make sure whatever the reservation fee is that it covers any potential monies that we keep if they cancel. This $400.00 does that.

Scott: That was the whole point. It doesn’t matter to me; it has to be at least $400.00 because I don’t think we need to be a collection agency anymore. If somebody owes us money it’s much easier that way. My only concern is it adds another step. The previous one took away a step. I like fewer steps, but I’m comfortable with the $400.00.
Roger: Anyone else?
David: I’m done
Roger: Ok I’m going to call for a vote; all in favor of making the reservation fee a flat $400.00 payable at the time of the reservation say Aye.

Jim, David, Scott, Paul, Tracy, and Don: Aye
Motion Carries

Paul: Do we need to change the Ballroom contract rules wording on that, instead of having a damage deposit have just straight reservation fee?
Roger: Yes. What I would like to do with that is have the office staff to work with Scott on a complete new wording of the contract to make sure that it carries out what the Board wanted.

Glenn : Are we going to have a discussion on, or do you want to do it next meeting, for the $60.00 charge for a security guard with alcohol?
Roger: I think we probably should queue it up.

Paul: We had some discussion on that.

Roger: I know we had some discussion on that.

David: There were several other wording changes that were proposed from the office on the contract. I think it would be good to have a bullet point list of the changes between what the current contract is and what the proposal is so that we don’t have to go through and try to read it and try to find each of those changes.

Roger: Is that different from what I said I wanted them to give Scott a draft of the contract and ask that he look at it?
David: Yours was to talk about the changes that have already been approved. I’m talking about they have significant wording changes to the contract that have been proposed prior to this.

Paul: They just need to be bumped together is all that Dave’s saying.

Roger: You mean there are more proposals coming from the office then just the security guard for alcohol consumption?
David: Absolutely, Yes.

Roger: I wasn’t aware of that. Whatever they are they will be presented that way well do it whenever we get it into the agenda. Glenn will give it to us in a point of comparison in two documents so that we can get current V.S. whatever you’re proposing.

Glenn : Some of the things like the wedding on the beach, that’s just a new procedure.
Roger: Do you want to work this with them Dave?
David: I think I already have. We’ve been through this.

Roger: I don’t consider them all to require Board actions.

David: I think if we are changing the contract the board should approve it.

Roger: Scott are you aware of what these are?
Scott: Yes. I have the same changes you have and if not just hand me that and Ill take yours and then I will work with Kellie to make sure we have that.

Roger: I want to see a contract that reflects what we’ve approved thus far.

Kellie: When do these new fees and prices go into effect? Do they go into effect right now?
Roger: No.

Kellie: Ok.

Roger:  Once you get Scott a contract that has that in it and he gives you a thumbs up that yes that is good then you will begin using that.
Kellie; Ok that’s all I wanted to know. Thank you

David: So we’ve got a two step process here. Get those changes that we have incorporated into the current contract. Then there are those additional changes that you proposed back in January. We need to take those and bullet point what those changes are so that when we have the conversation next time, we can walk right though what those changes are as opposed as to just rewriting the contract and having us go through.

Paul: I know that the office staff probably knows this but the cancellation fee is only in effect on any contracts signed after it is in effect. Correct? The existing contracts we can’t go back and change that?

Roger: That is correct. We are not modifying existing contracts.

New Business

Dan Kayich 1655: Requesting a variance for my driveway of a culvert because it is not needed.

David: Are you building a house on a lot that doesn’t have one?
Dan: Yes it’s a new house.

Gerry Theodor 1346: The building committee recommends approval for this variance.
Conversation Ensues

Action: David motion to approve, Scott seconds.

Motion Carries

 

David Motions to adjourn

Paul seconds

Meeting adjourns at 8:45 p.m.

Executive Session adjourns at 9:45 p.m.

 

 

Submitted by

Tracy Ferguson

Kellie Bechtold

Back To Top


 

Holishor Association Inc.

Board of Directors Meeting

April 9, 2008

Minutes

 

Roger Groth , President, calls the meeting to order, 7:35 p.m. the Pledge of Allegiance is recited.

 

Attendance: Roger Groth , David Decker , Tracy Ferguson , Scott Webber , Jim May , Don Austin and Paul Mormino . Glen Dalton, Lake Manager , is excused. Approximately 4 Holishor members present.

 

Minutes of March 26, 2008

Action: David motions to approve, Don seconds.

David: Last page of minutes, the Building Committee recommended approval for that variance and I think it should be in the minutes. Motion carries

 

Bills & Salaries

Action: David motions to approve, Paul seconds. Motion carries.

 

Treasurer’s Report

Scott: The funds that are coming in for the deck; do they have their own account?

Angie Basham Office Manager: They are in the operating funds but they are earmarked to be moved to their own account.

Scott: Asks where we are on the deck funds.

Angie Basham : We have about $3,400.00 right now.

Roger: We did close on lot 1055, our third lot sold.

Paul: One thing I didn’t do from last year’s Golf Tournament, I need to make a motion to move $1,000.00 out of Golf Tournament profit to the Social Committee account. I haven’t done that as of yet.

Roger: Do you mean for 2007? It has to be done within the same budget year.

David: The profit from last year’s Golf Tournament has already been distributed.

Conversation Ensues

Action: Jim motions to approve, Paul seconds. Motion carries.

 

Transfers of Property

Action: David motions to approve, Tracy seconds. Motion carries.

 

Manager’s Report

Read by Roger Groth

 

Security Report

Scott: Look at the incidents involving people with alcohol in the ballroom. We need to discuss that $60 security fee again for any function in the ballroom that involves alcohol.

 

Website Committee Report

Art Surgant 1812: Not much to report, the office is taking it over, though I did get an email that the domain name is about to come up.

Kellie Bechtold Office Coordinator: We already renewed it.

 

Old Business

Annual Meeting Preparation

Names for the Board of Directors Ballots drawn by Jeannie Votruba 493

  1. David Decker
  2. Ray Garber
  3. Don Austin
  4. Derrick Richardson

 

Roger: In the event of a tie the names will be put into a hat at the Annual Meeting and drawn to see who gets the longer term.

Action: Paul motions to approve the Board of Directors Ballot, Don Seconds

Motion carries.

 

New Business

Foreclosure/Bankruptcy Write-Off:

Action: David motions to approve the write off for $1,804.55, Scott Seconds.

Motion Carries

 

Roger: Reminding everyone that Meet the Candidates Night is Friday April 11, 2008 . and is inclined to cancel Meet the Candidates Night.

Jeannie Votruba 493: Would like to come to the meeting to meet the Candidates and hear what they have to say.

 

Action: Paul motions to adjourn, Scott Seconds.

Meeting adjourns at 8.03

 

Submitted by Tracy Ferguson, Kellie Bechtold

Back To Top


 

Holishor Association Inc.

Board of Directors

April 23, 2008

Minutes

 

Roger Groth , President, calls the meeting to order, 7:45 p.m. the Pledge of Allegiance is recited.

 

Attendance: Roger Groth , Tracy Ferguson , Scott Webber , David Decker , Paul Mormino , Don Austin and Jim May . Approximately 5 Holishor members present.

 

Roger: I apologize for running late, we had a pre-meeting with the auditor and we have a clean audit report.

 

Minutes of April 9, 2008

Action: Scott motions to approve, David seconds

Paul: What happened during the last Treasures Report? I wanted to ask about 2007’s golf revenue. Are we transferring that or is it lost?

Roger: We queued that up to look at it.

David: Last year we transferred the funds from the previous year’s golf outing and split it up among various committees and some to buy the projector. As far as last years proceeds we did not distribute any funds into any other account. I looked at that earlier this year.

Roger: Ok, first let’s look at the minutes we have a motion and a second. In the minutes under Treasurers Report there is where you raise the question Paul. David’s statement says that the profit from last years Golf Tournament has already been distributed. If David is speaking about 2006, this is correct. If he is speaking about 2007, it is not correct. How do we want to get this changed in the minutes?

David: I believe I stated that last year in the year 2007 we distributed some proceeds from the 2006 Golf Tournament. Proceeds from the 2007 Golf Tournament had not been distributed.

Roger: We have already amended the 2008 Operating Budget. If we are going to take monies from the 2008 budget it is an adjustment that is going to have to be thought through.

Scott: Is there a way we can make a double contribution out of the 08 golf funds?

Paul: I just want to know what happened to the money from the 07 Golf Tournament if asked.

Roger: It’s not lost in paperwork. It’s applied in the 08 Operating Budget.

Conversation Ensues

Roger: The minutes need to be clarified with Dave’s statement. If its 07 funds it has to be moved in 07, not in 08.

David: My statement needs to be corrected, by putting years into it. The profits from 2006 Golf Tournament were distributed in 2007; the profits from the 2007 Golf tournament were not distributed, yet.

Conversation Ensues

Roger: Glenn take a look at where we are in 2008 and see if you can give us options on transferring $1000.00 out of the budget to the Social Committee, and we will look at that next meeting.

Motion Carries

 

Transfers of Property

Action: Jim motions to approve, Don seconds

Scott: I’m looking at the $10,000.00 number; does that mean the Morning Glory is fully funded?

Roger: The Morning Glory repairs we are envisioning in the reserve account are fully funded, yes.
Paul: Not quite, we added on a 10% contingency on that because of inflation.

Motion Carries

 

Correspondence

Mike Utechtt: Twin Rivers Karate Self-Defense Class in Ballroom

Tracy reads

To be discussed in New Business

5 Letters from members supporting Mike Utechtt, not read into minutes.

 

Old Business

Ballroom Contract

Scott: I compared the existing contract to the first rewrite by the office, there have not been any changes, I went down and compared line item by line item each difference.

Don: The statement in alcoholic beverages, does that make sense the way it is written? Item 10, maybe I’m not reading it right.

Paul: Should be contract

Don: Should be alcohol, maybe containing?

Scott: How do you want it worded Don?
Don: I don’t know I’m just asking if that is the correct way to word it.

David: All events where alcohol is present.

Roger: Why don’t we change it to all events serving alcohol must contract a Security Guard through Lessor. That whole paragraph 10 in the contract specifies how you go about doing that.

Scott Reads Changes

Discussion

Roger: I’m going to go through these one by one and if it appears that we have a majority on the major points of consequence we will note that, and I’m going to give this back to you Scott to work with the staff to give us a contract proposal that matches everything that was voted upon the last meeting and we will vote on it in its entirety next meeting without rehashing the finer points. Some of this is too small business for me.

 

Changes:

  1. Rental Fees
    1. Added “Alcohol required Security Guard $60”

Discussion
David: A majority says yes.
Roger; I want to poll without further discussion. Its 4, lets put that on the contract. Now is there something that you want to say about that.
Paul: I think if you have 25 people up here playing bridge and you decide to have wine why do you need a guard standing at the door. I think it’s silly.

Jim: I agree completely

 

  1. Rental Period
    1. “The rental term shall be from
    1. 9:00 am
        changed from
      noon

Discussion

Roger: This seems reasonable to me.

David: The biggest concern is if you have 2 people renting, I don’t know as far as the cleaning people what time they are going to be able to get in here.

Glenn : A majority of the cleaning is done by the people that are here and we contract the Beacon girls to clean as well.
David: It is required by contract that we hire someone to clean the room.

Paul: Are you asking will they be done in time?

David: Yes
Glenn : Yes. It is cleaned that night.

Conversation Ensues

Scott: The Breakfast with Santa and the Easter Egg Hunt they have to get cleaned up after the events and have to be out of there by noon for a party that night.

David: You’re thinking more of the Social Committee events.

Kellie: I always call the Social Committee to make sure it is ok if we rent the room that night and the person renting is informed that they will not be able to get in until a later time. It’s at their own risk.

David: Is the contract amended to show that?
Kellie: No it’s more of a verbal agreement.

Roger: Ok let’s do this, put in some verbiage that the normal rent time commences at 9am unless the office informs them of a different time of rental that will be annotated in the contract. Just write it in at that point and is initialed by the renter. It doesn’t seem like it’s a point of contention with us.

Conversation Ensues

Scott: We should have it in reverse order, have the time start at Noon and if they need to get in earlier they can do that with the office.

 

 

  1. Reservation Fee & Damage Deposit
    1. Fee for Member’s use              $400.00 (possible refund $325.00)

                                                               i.      Changed from $325 refund $250

Discussion

Roger: We will get back to this point lets move on to Rentals on the Beach.

 

  1. Rental Fee Must be paid two (2) weeks prior to the rental date.
    1. New to contract

 

  1. Cancellation
    1. Proposed: 

Rental Cost

85.00

170.00

400.00

Notification Days

Cost to Member if Canceling

>90

25.00

50.00

100.00

89-60

35.00

75.00

175.00

59-30

55.00

110.00

260.00

<30

85.00

170.00

400.00

                                                               i.     

    1. As  written:

                                                               i.      If Lessor is notified of cancellation in writing ninety (90) days prior to the scheduled event, the reservation fee/damage deposit will be refunded in full, For notification 60 to 89 days in advance, the Member will receive a 50% refund of the reservation fee/damage deposit, 30 to 59 days in advance only 25% refund of the reservation fee/damage deposit and cleaning fee, and any cancellation under 30 days in advance results in a full loss of reservation fee/damage deposit.

 

  1. Inspections
    1. Added “After the event, if no damage or losses are noted, a $325.00 refund of your deposit will be mailed to you”.

 

  1. Weddings on the Beach
    1. New

                                                               i.      Weddings are permitted outdoors with the following conditions. 

                                                             ii.      Wedding are to last for no more than 2 ½ hours.  Including set-up, rehearsal, photos, breakdown, and etc. 

                                                            iii.      Flowers or any other vegetation may not be moved, cut or removed.

                                                           iv.      Littering is not permitted.  You may toss flower petals or use bubbles, but not confetti, birdseed or rice.  It is detrimental to the health of our water fowl and birds.

                                                             v.      Tents or canopies are not allowed.  You should plan an alternate location in case of inclement weather.  We do not provide an alternative venue for your event unless you have also rented the ballroom.

                                                           vi.      Staking or pounding of decorations or items into the ground is not permitted due to potential damage to underground security, electric and irrigation systems.

                                                          vii.      Driving on grounds is prohibited.

                                                        viii.      The grounds will accommodate approximately 150 people.

                                                           ix.      Chair rental is the responsibility of the member.  Holishor does not supply or rent chairs.

                                                             x.      Holishor is not responsible for stolen or lost items left on premises.

                                                           xi.      Do not rope off designated areas.  The clubhouse and beach area is a public facility for our members.  People will be able to walk through the area, even during your event.  Visitors have always shown respect for weddings held on the grounds.

                                                          xii.      You are financially responsible for any damage to the grounds, buildings and plantings that occur as a result of your ceremony.  Please help maintain the beauty of the landscape.

                                                        xiii.      Guests are required to provide constant supervision of all children attending or participating in the event.  This is a Lake community and certain risks occur near the water.

                                                        xiv.      Wedding rehearsals must be scheduled two (2) months in advance.

                                                         xv.      Any special arrangements must be made in writing and require written approval prior to the event.

Discussion
David
: The only point I will make is that I can still come out and get married on the beach and not rent this Ballroom Contract.

Roger: What do we do about that? Nothing

Conversation Ensues

Roger: This came up because Michelle and Danielle field these kinds of questions and we need some answers to it.

David: My point is that just because it’s in the contract doesn’t mean it’s completely enforceable.

10.    Alcoholic Beverages

a.       Added “All events containing alcohol must contact a security guard through Lessor with a charge of $60.00 per five (5) hour block”.

 

11.    Rules and Restrictions

a.       Added “No equipment may be set-up on the dance floor”.

b.      Proposed:

The ballroom is a no-smoking area. Trash cans and ashtrays are provided on the outside deck for your convenience.  Please dispose of your cigarette ashes and trash in a responsible manner, there is a restaurant below.

c.       Should read: The ballroom is a no-smoking area. All smoking must take place at least 15 feet away from any door or window in accordance with the Illinois No Smoking Law. There is an ashtray located at the end of the walkway outside the front of the clubhouse. Please dispose of your cigarette butts in a designated ash tray.

Discussion

David: Does the band constitute equipment? That’s where they always set up.

Roger: Maybe they shouldn’t be on the dance floor, because that’s how it got damaged in the first place.

Conversation Ensues

Roger: If that’s where they have to be then it can’t be done. Let’s take that out.

 

Roger: Back to the Fees and Cancellations.

Scott: I have one question we skipped over 10 after Don corrected my writing, are we going to come back to that?

Roger: No we took care of that under two.

David: Just for clarification, the $60 is for a five hour block, if you have more than 5 hours do we have another charge with that?

Scott: You have to buy two blocks.

Paul: You start using the club house at 12 noon

Roger: If I’m starting to serve alcohol and I hire a bartender at noon I get a security guard and I keep the bartender longer then 5 hours I have to hire the security for an additional 5 hours.

Tracy : if they go seven hours instead of 5 they are paying for 10 hours?

Glenn : Yes.

Conversation Ensues

 

Roger: Fees and Cancellation, we have already approved the rental fee schedule correct? And in so doing did we not approve the refund policy?
Don: That is correct we did not.

David: We did the rental fee policy. I thought that 2 meetings ago we approved the refund rates and the deposit to hold the facility. The way I envisioned it was the deposit was $400 and you would have to pay up to the rest of your rental.

Roger: Scott what I’m going to ask you to do is go back to the minutes and get the exact verbiage and put it in a contract. Let David look at it and get it back to us.

Conversation Ensues

 

12.    Lessor’s Remedies

a.       Change  to “Paragraph 11”

 

Roger: Get the language the way you want it in the contract and we will vote on the whole contract next meeting.

 

New Business

Mike Utechtt: Twin Rivers Karate Self-Defense Class in Ballroom

Roger: The letter Tracy read is from a non- member and attached to that was a contract signed by Mike Lattimore 1777 who wishes to sponsor Mike Utechtt to run classes twice a week for 1 year. He is willing to give the association 20% that he takes in. Do we have anyone here on this issue?

Mike Utechtt: I am.
Roger: You’re not a member.

Mike: No. I’m not.
Roger: Ordinarily only members attend our meetings. Since its obvious you have a sponsor and he’s not here I’m going to let you remain here for this so that if we have any questions we can ask them. One of the issues is that it’s being conducted outside of our membership. I’m assuming there is no rental on the Ballroom correct
Glenn ?
Glenn : Yes.

David: First question is Lattimore in good standing?
Glenn : Yes.

David: Locking up the Clubhouse for two nights a week for a whole year seems pretty extreme. I know you have letters but I don’t know how many people are in your classes from Holiday Shores .
Roger: Take the podium so we can ask you a few questions. Mike, are you saying that these classes are going to be open to Holishor residents only?
Mike: No. A lot of my students have friends that come and take the classes with them.

Roger: You would be opening the classes to members and non members?

Mike: Yes.

David: What percentage roughly are Holishor members?
Mike: Roughly 85%

Roger: Minimum Size class?
Mike: 10 people

Tracy : How many classes a night?
Mike: 2

Roger: How many per class

Mike: 15 to 20 at the most.
Paul: If we ever worked out that if something popped up that a member wanted to use this could we work around that?
Mike: Yes. If someone wanted to use it that day, just let me know and I can reschedule for a different time.

Tracy : Is there any way to do a trial period of 6 months?

Mike: Sure, or on a month to month basis. I just want to provide something to the members of Holiday Shores .

Conversation Ensues

Roger: The issue of non members, is that an issue?
Tracy : No, we have non members rent the room for weddings all the time.

Roger: Downside we have a sponsor that is responsible for the Ballroom and all the equipment. We have no security deposit.

David: I think that we should still have a security deposit.
Roger: How do you feel about putting down a $400 deposit?
Mike: That would be feasible.

Don: What’s our liability if someone was injured?

Roger: We would probably get sued. If I throw a wedding out here or I sponsor my children who throw a wedding out here everyone who comes is a guest of a member. When you come out here and eat in the Beacon Inn you are a guest of a member. And what we are doing with this is we are opening to the public and he is the agent. It takes the relationship farther then where we normally go.

Conversation Ensues

Roger: It would be a lot cleaner in my mind if it were open to Holiday Shore members only.

Tracy : But recently we opened up other to outsiders.

Roger: On the Ski Club.

David: Not only that but the oil painting class also allowed non-members.

Don: How is your record in the past have you had any injuries?

Mike: No, not in 32 years, its more discipline than kicking and the parents are there.

Tracy : My youngest son is in Tai-Kwan-Do and it’s a different culture and Ill bet if you walk in you will see very well behaved children and respectful children. No rough housing. It’s not like a free for all.

Jim: There might be a possibility of adding us as a named insured on his policy which means if we got sued then they would only be talking to one insurance company.
Roger: Does that sound feasible
Glenn ?

Glenn : Yes
David: The Dancing that’s on a Thursday?
Kellie: Yes but that ends before his begins.

Roger: Glenn look into this more and get Holishor added to his insurance policy and a different request for only 3 months and ask the dance club if they are coming back. And a security deposit.

David: The one thing Mr. Lattimore needs to understand is that he is responsible for these facilities.

Paul: I would like to see the sponsor here as well.

Write off

Action: David motions to approve the $1,357.60 write off, Paul seconds.

Motion Carries

 

Open Floor

Mike Bell 1685 for Ski Club: Permission to put in boat docks and jumps to start Ski Club practices as early as next week
Roger: Detail on docks, are they the same as you’ve had before?

Mike: Yes the same we have had for the past 2 years. When we are done we tie it up at Ski Beach and secure it.
Glenn : Doing the dredge out at Captains Cove is really going to impact him. We can do it here(Clubhouse) or down near Tamarach Beach . We own lot 477 next to Tamarach Beach and he can tie up his jump there.

Mike: It would be less congestion and headaches skiing up there rather then taking off here at the docks in the heart of the lake. This way we are at the end of the lake.
Roger: Would you have him move once you went into Captains Cove?

Glenn : We would have him start and set up down there( Tamarach Beach ) yes.

Conversation Ensues

Roger: I want to go down and look before you put in the Docks and Jump.

David: How long until your dredging impact the Ski Club?

Glenn : Hopefully less than two weeks.

Roger: I feel that we need to go up and visualize Tamarach Beach ; I’m not seeing the lot that we own there. I can go out there probably Friday and satisfy my concerns.

Paul: Does this qualify as a Board action?
Roger: Yes. Anything that goes into the lake requires a Board action.

Conversation Ensues

Roger: Everyone weigh in with my Friday night and let me know we can decide then.

 

David Motions to adjourn to Executive Session, Jim seconds.

Motion Carries

Ajourn at 9:09 pm

Executive Session

Action: David motions to adjourn, Paul seconds.

Motion carries.

Adjourn at 9:35 pm

Back To Top


Holishor Association, Inc.

Board of Directors Meeting

May 14, 2008

 

 

Roger Groth: President Calls the meeting to order, 7:40 p.m. Pledge of Allegiance is Recited

 

Attendance: Roger Groth, Tracy Ferguson, David Decker, Paul Mormino, Don Austin, Jim May. Scott Webber will be late.

 

Minutes of April 23, 2008

Action: David Motions to approve, Tracy seconds

Motion Carries

 

Bills & Salaries

Action: David Motions to approve, Paul Seconds

David: The radios? We didn’t have that much budgeted for them from what I saw.
Glenn: where that came up was in order for us to be in contact with the fire department or the police we had to have a digital.

David: was there a recovery cost of the old?

Glenn: They will use the old.
Roger: How much of a discrepancy was it?
David: $300
Paul: Security carries a cell phone and the maintenance guy?
Glenn: Yes

Paul: The lake patrol probably needs a radio, is that what we use these for?
Glenn: Weither it’s the guy on patrol or the guy on the lake he needs the capability to talk to
Madison county.

Motion Carries

 

Profit Loss Budget

Accepted as written

 

Transfers of Property

Action: Tracy Motions to approve, Paul Seconds

Jim: The sales price of a house was $62,000?

Glenn: Yes

Motion Carries

 

Manager’s Report

Given By Glenn Dalton

 

Security Report

Accepted as written

 

Treasurers Report

David: One special note, there was a payment made on the property. It’s not in the balances on the report it’s just as a foot note. The reserve for the Morning Glory is right at $70,000 at this point.

Action: Paul motions to approve Don Seconds

Motion Carries

 

Lake Management Report

           

Correspondence

Social Committee Polynesian Night Read by Tracy

 

Judy McFerran 382 Highpoint: Piano Recital fee waiver Member in good Standing, Ballroom available Read by Tracy

 

Dan Turk 1810 Sextant: Fundraiser in Ballroom, Daughter had breast Cancer, to help with bills, Request to waive fees Member in Good standing, Date Available Read by Tracy

 

To be discussed in New business

           

Old Business

$1000, to Social Committee

Roger: A meeting or two ago and asked Glenn to look at the current budget to see if we had the $1000 to move to the Social Committee.

Glenn: What we have found that we have port-a-potties on all the beaches and we budgeted for one at the marina, which is not needed so we have the money

Paul motions to approve the moving of $1000 to the social committee account, David seconds.

Motion Carries

 

Self Defense Class use of Ballroom

Roger: Kicked it back to Glenn and asked him to make it clear with the sponsor and do some things with the insurance, Glenn?
Glenn: Reads a letter to the board regarding the class. Mr. Lattimore, Mr. Utect and I signed this letter stating that we all read it and understand it.

Jim motions to approve the Self Defense classes based upon the letter as written, Tracy Seconds

Roger: The first sentence says for 3 month increments, how are we going to handle this?

Glenn: They will have to come back prior to the succession and get another approval for the next class.
David: I recommend that it comes in a month before the start of the next class.

Motion Carries

 

Roger: Scott Webber has joined us.  

 

Annual Meeting Agenda

Roger: Glenn, Do you feel that we are ready for the annual meeting? Enough Tellers and vote counters?
Glenn: Yes.

Roger: In the packet we have the $25 special assessments on the Budget, I am going to split that off and if it is approved we will vote on the budget with that in it. On a couple of administrative things, people could go on the deck and smoke, now with the new law there is no smoking out there. I talked to Rob and he is going to rope off an area outside and station a guard out there so that we don’t have to check them back in. I handed out the minutes from a last years meeting, that’s just for information’s sake. If there is anything of significant consequence in there let me know. Is there anything else?
David:
I know we approved the minutes from the following annual meeting, but for reference sake we should get them out to the Board of Directors less than 2 weeks after the meeting.

Next Steps for Morning Glory Repair

Roger: We talked to the engineer about what time of the year this could be done and if January would be good. She said yes because it was so far underground. I would like to direct Glenn to get the solicitations out on the street and have the bids come in. And when the bids come back in we have her look at them so we don’t shoot ourselves in the foot. Would an October time frame give us enough time to have someone in here in January or February?

Paul: Those do not seem to be a problem, but the only thing that bothers me is that we have a Lake Committee and I’m totally in the dark on everything.

Roger: Well you’re not going to like this but you are the chair of that committee and you don’t call meetings you don’t give reports, so I don’t want to hear it.

Conversation Ensues

Roger: Glenn, go ahead and proceed with that.

 

New Business

 

Judy McFerran 382 Highpoint: Piano Recital fee waiver Member in good Standing, Ballroom available

David: I don’t really have a, disagreement with wanting to use the clubhouse for this, the Social committee does movie nights and such, and I would recommend that Judy work with the Social Committee with that instead of asking for a variance on the fees. This is becoming a concern, if it’s for the kids the social committee has a lot to do with that.

Scott: She wants the ballroom for a piano recital?
Glenn: Yes and a work shop. It’s a one time deal.

David: We also got a notice on the Polynesian night letter.
Roger: I assume that the recital is a correlation of lessons, and she charges for the lessons? Is that a good assumption?
Scott: From someone that pays $80 a month for dance lessons it always ends in a recital.
No motion to approve

Roger: Do we suggest to the Social Committee and do it through them?
David: I would like that.

Conversation Ensues

Roger: Glenn asks her to come in and address the board at the next meeting.

 

Dan Turk 1810 Sextant: Fundraiser in Ballroom, Daughter had breast Cancer, to help with bills, Request to waive fees Member in Good standing, Date Available

Paul Motions to approve the waiver of the fees for the fundraiser, Scott Seconds

David: This is a benefit for an individual who is a member of out community, it is talking about the balance between doing what’s right for individuals and fellow neighbors and using our facilities the best way we can. Because this person is a member it is benefiting a members Family, it’s a lot differently than some of the stuff we do, and I would recommend that we approve this.

Don: We always have to decide weather we approve or not approve; I say we need to have a policy for things like this. I agree with approving this one.
Roger: Glenn Call other associations and see how they handle subjects such as this to help us with some guidelines.

Jim: Alcohol?
Glenn: They will have to go through the Beacon and have a security guard.

David: The Security Deposit, we talked about it having to be put down even if the fees are waived. I think we need to do that with these one and all from now on.

Motion Carries

 

 

Youth Committee Preliminary Discussion

Tracy : I wanted to possibly introduce a youth committee, ages 8-19 to get the youth involved in the communities. It would not be like the social committee events, it would be more towards the Geo program, basically its just a self esteem building, they would have to raise their own funds. I have been talking to the Geo program and there the kids have to donate 15 hours of their time going to old age homes, picking up trash and volunteering. They could help any committee tear down; clean up, work the events and it would help the community. Would anyone be interested in something like that?
Roger: I ask
Tracy if you could get a charter together and present it to the board at the next meeting.
David: I think it sounds like a great Idea.

 

Fire Works contract including a multi-year deal

Glenn: The fireworks business is slow; we are still using the same guys to do our fireworks. We have not increased our funds or next years. What we are looking at here is that they are saying that we could make a payment by May 1st and we missed that so they extended it to the 1st of June. If we do this we get 7% more ammunition, pyrotechnical shoot at the show.

Roger: Is that a multi year agreement?
Glenn: That’s part of the other section of the contract.
Glenn Reads the Contract, there are multiple bonus products depending on how many years we do this. This would increase the amount of the display without increasing the amount of money we spend.

Roger: We only prepay that year?

Glenn: Yes
Conversation Ensues

Roger: Rain date of the 5th of July is ok?
Multiple Yes

Paul: Are we shopping around for this? What’s the shoot fee?

Glenn: That’s the cost of the pyro technician we always have the same guy and its included in the price.

Conversation Ensues

Don Motions to approve the rain date of July 5th, Scott seconds

Motion Carries

 

David Motions to approve the full amount for 2008 Jim, seconds

 

Roger: The multi year agreement is to be sent back to have the language match the single year agreement.

 

Adult Fishing Tournament

David: Is this asking for our approval or just a notification?
Glenn: it’s an annual tournament every year and this is just a notification.

Roger: last year was the first year it was done under this format. It was a fundraiser, and because that component is added to it I feel the board has to approve this.

David: I agree, I just want to say that it’s already published and its going, so we may want to approve that prior to that being done from now on. It is a great event for the community

Conversation Ensues

Jim Moves to approve the fishing tournament on a continuing basis, David seconds.

Paul: I know that they give a lot of the fish back and buy more for the lake, I don’t see that in there.
Glenn: Yes they do.
Paul: Should that be a percentage in the contract?

David: Who puts this on?
Glenn: The Tiki Bar Bass Club
Roger: that’s not a Holishor Approved Club right?
Glenn: That’s Correct

David: There is no point stipulating that they have to give back to the community.

Motion Carries

Restaurant Air Return System

Glenn: There is a problem; it is not doing the function it was meaning to do down there. The Smoke and the Heat buildup is not being exhausted out of the building unless we take out the filters and because of Fire codes us have to have them in there. We went out and contacted a person that was in this business and Danielle and Michelle got a contractor to see what was wrong with it and give us a bid. We contacted someone in out business to tell us what he thinks and a bid. He did not give it to us for this meeting. The problem is the Horse power with the fan and the small hole. That will cause the AC to go out the Exhaust, we are trying to get an Idea of what the system needs to do down there to make it not do that. I will bring it back to the next board meeting to have you approve it.

Roger: If I recall the budget there is not much in there.
Paul: Isn’t there a problem with the path of the exhaust?
Glenn: Yes. The Filters being out is causing Grease to be sucked up in there and creates a major concern for me.

Held to the next meeting for the second bid

Senator Haine Support for Emergency Planning and Preparedness Project

Roger: Glenn is trying to get us some money for the Morning Glory, the Senator put it on the floor for us.

Glenn: We will Know about the time Elections come around.

 

Open Floor

 

Jeanie Votruba 493: Because it will effect our voting in that end of the lake, was there anything decided with the Ski Club on the lake?
Roger: Yes, Glenn met with the president and they should be able to operate down there without any problems. They will be starting it later on then anticipated though.
Jeanie: The group that is trying to raise money for the deck is selling tickets for a Wii and I was wondering if it would be possible for me to sell the tickets at the annual meeting.
Roger: Sure, You and I can talk and say how to advertise for it.

 

Art Surgant 1812: Thank you for allowing the Dance lessons that commenced here, It was fun!

 

David Motions to Adjourn to executive session, Scott

Motion Carries

Adjourn at 8:45 p.m.

Back To Top


 

Holishor Association, Inc.

Board of Directors Meeting

May 28, 2008

Minutes

 

Attendance:

Board members:

     Present:  Ray Garber, Don Austin, Scott Webber, David Decker, Paul Mormino.

     Excused: Derrick Richardson and Roger Groth

     Quorum Present - Yes

 

Others present: Approximately 6 Holishor members

                          Glen Dalton and Kellie Bechtold from Holiday Shores office   

Proceedings:

Meeting called to order at 7:30 PM by Chair, Scott Weber

Pledge of allegiance recited

Scott Welcomes Ray Garber, David Decker and Don Austin back to the board.

 

Minutes of May 14, 2008
Action: David motions to approve, Ray Seconds

Motion Carries

 

Transfers of Property

Action: Paul motions to approve, David seconds

Motion Carries

 

Correspondence

 Kent Robinette 2078 Jolly Roger: Flooding, pictures enclosed
Read by Don Austin

Issue was deferred to new business

 

Old Business

None

 

Scott:  Thanks to all those who attended the Annual Meeting. The vote on the COLA tied during the meeting.

 

New Business

Kent Robinette 2078 Jolly Roger: Flooding, pictures enclosed

Kent Robinette 2078:  It affects mine, the neighbor and Nathan’s as well, which is 2077.

Scott:  I drove by it the other day and it was a safety hazard. Glenn would you like to discuss the issue?
Glenn: The association’s responsibility with water is to get it from one side of the road to the other. In your case it does come across the road through the water shed through your 12 inch pipe under your driveway. It goes down about 30 feet and there is a huge catch basin. You have an 8 inch pipe that drains it out of the catch bin. The previous owners thought this was the way to fix it, and because they built it, it is now your pipe. Unfortunately the association can do nothing about this. I suggest the catch basin be moved up to the side of the road.

Kent :   But if you look at it, assume the pipe and drain was not there, how would you evacuate it from the top of the road?

Glenn: If you took that pipe out it would follow the path of least resistance and since it goes from a 12inch pipe to an 8 inch pipe that’s going to cause it to back up.

Conversation Ensues

Nathan Bowser 2077:  I can point out on the 8 inch pipe where it is blocked. It’s a little bit past Kent ’s patio and it is blocked solid. 80-90% of it is not flowing through. Any kind of a downpour you can see it start to pull that.
Ray:    Did the 8 inch pipe ever solve the issue.
Kent :   The neighbor at 2080 said that it never did that till the house across the street was built.

Ray:   At a point you have to know that an 8 inch pipe can’t drain as fast as the 12 inch pipe.

Conversation Ensues

David: Have you ever had the pipe cleared?
Multiple No’s
David:  
Wouldn’t that be the first thing you would do is get the pipe cleared?  That seems like the logical thing to do since the neighbor had said it was partially clogged.

Conversation Ensues

Paul:  I have 5 points I have written down here. One thing in my mind you have a 12 inch to an 8 inch pipe, that will slow the drain of water down. The second thing I want to ask is what are you looking for as resolutions from us?

Kent :  Help.
David:  What kind of help?
Kent : Well we can pay the money to get it augured out, but to me that is still not going to eliminate the problem.

Paul: I went by your houses three times, your houses are really close together there and to get rid of this you’re going to have a swale there with rip rap that is going to cause a type of log-floom.

David:  During a rain I get 3-4 foot of water in a ditch. If I lived there I would try to clear the pipe. The home owner built it so it’s the home owner’s responsibility. If that doesn’t work then we need to come up with another solution.

Conversation Ensues

Paul: Another point is that it’s clogged but again it’s your personal property. Then there is the safety issue, I don’t want us to turn our backs on this, I have a big problem with kids playing and falling into it. The Fifth thing is that you can’t redirect the natural flow of water anywhere, like at your neighbor’s house.

Scott:  It is the homeowner’s property so I would suggest that you first clean out the 8in pipe, if that does not work then they need to contact Glenn.

 

Allied Waste Rate increase of 3% letter

Read by Don Austin

Glenn:  They are set up to come out at our next meeting and answer any questions.

Don: Does this need to be approved by the Board?
David: Yes, it states in the original contract that they may come back and request an increase for diesel fuel.

Missy Bowser 2077:  Are they going to put a 3% on a trash pickup or are they going to do that with the yard waste too?
David:  My first assumption is it’s across the board but we will have to ask them.

Allied Waste representative will be at the next meeting.  Issue tabled until the next meeting.

                     

Chamber of Commerce Edwardsville/Glen Carbon Renew

Scott: What are we getting for it in the first place?

Glenn: I tried to find that response and I can find no valid reason.

Scott: Anything we can gain from it, Sponsor ships, golf tournament, and holiday times?
Glenn: I can look into that Scott, but I can’t find anything from the past that we have ever gotten from them.

Action: David motions not to renew, Paul seconds

Motion Carries

 

DCEO Grant Submission

Scott: Roger went over this at the annual meeting. Real quick we have $150,000 grant that we still have to turn in the forms for, to receive it, it’s not guaranteed. The money is just allocated.  There are a number of items we want to accomplish but the main purpose is for the Morning Glory Repair. After the Morning Glory it would be things like Rip Rap and the principal on the North Property.  It has been written, so if you have any changes submit them to Glenn.
Paul: On the survey on page 10, we have an amount we have limited 10-15% of grant funding for that.
Glenn: That was on the written explanation I passed out to you and they were comfortable with that.

 

Open Floor Discussion

Laura Scaturo 1716: On the subject of waste pickup fees; “If it’s a 3% increase across the board why are we paying an additional 3% for trash bins?  I can see the fuel, but not the bins. Please look into that for our best interest”

Paul: That is a good question and we will look into that.

 

David motions for executive session, Don seconds

Motion Carries

 

Reconvene from executive session David Motions Paul Seconds

Joyce Kirby and Ray Garber were approved for bank account transfer privileges.

David Motions to Adjourn, Don Seconds
Motion Carries

 

Meeting adjourned at 8:35 PM

 

Minutes submitted by Don Austin Secretary and Kellie Bechtold

Back To Top


Holishor Association, Inc.

Board of Directors Meeting

June 11, 2008

Minutes

 

Attendance:

Board members:

Present:  Scott Webber, Derrick Richardson, Ray Garber, Don Austin, 

   David Decker and Paul Mormino.

Excused: Roger Groth

Quorum Present: - Yes

 

Others Present:

16 Holishor Members Present

            Glenn Dalton and Kellie Bechtold from Holiday Shores Office

 

Proceedings:

Meeting called to order at 7:35 PM by Chair, Scott Webber

Pledge of Allegiance Recited

Scott would like to Welcome Derrick Richardson to the Board of Directors

 

Minutes of May 28, 2008

Action: Dave motions to approve, Paul seconds

Motion Carries

 

Bills and Salaries

Action: Ray Motions to approve, Derrick Seconds

Motion Carries

 

Transfers of property

Action: Paul Motions to approve Derrick seconds

Motion Carries

 

Managers Report

Given by Glenn Dalton

Paul: Are we patching any potholes in the streets?

Glenn: Now that it’s not wet we will
Ray:
The DCEO grant, have you any feedback if there or any questions?
Glenn: We did one follow up call and they were satisfied with the submittal and they will get back to us once it is approved.

 

Becky Burlingame 1398:  If the dredging goes well when are you looking to do Captains Cove and Concrete cove?
Glenn:
We are going to spend most of the summer in Captain’s Cove because of the massive amount of silt.  In September will be moving in to Concrete cove.  Jim Perotti says there is not that much silt in the Concrete cove.

 

Scott:  Will the boat lifts be in the way?

 

Glenn:  We will not get that close to them

Jim Perotti: We will not get any closer than 8 feet.

 

Security Report

Given by Glenn Dalton

           

Treasurers Report

Given by David Decker

 

Correspondence

Read by Don Austin

Kathryn Hymel ADK Educational Sorority (Christmas Party): They want the fees waived.

To be discussed in New Business

 

Variance Request: Fence, Building Committee agrees to approve

To be discussed in New Business

 

Bid from Thyssen Krupp Elevator bid

To be discussed in New Business

 

Old Business

Allied Waste management increase in fees. 

Scott: They will be here next meeting to discuss.

 

New Business

Scott:  Survey results are in from the Volunteer survey at Annual meeting and the Board and Office need to look these over to see there are any constructive ideas we can use. 

 

Variance Request: Fence, Building Committee agrees to approve

Rebecca Burlingame 1398: Basically were just trying to put a nice fence at the level of the concrete wall to prevent any kind of an accident and the 25 foot setback cuts the yard in half and creates a safety hazard.

Ray: My first reaction is to approve it, my only question is that if we approve this 4 feet, there are probably other situations like this around Holiday Shore where people will want three feet or some other dimension once they see we are allowing this.  If we approve this we may have to approve more.
Paul: To me it’s a safety issue.

Jim Perotti : Those houses on Concrete Cove the board gave a special variance, because they are not 50 feet from the lake. What she is asking for is definitely a safety issue.  She is going to have a gate going down the steps; it’s just a safety issue for the variance.

Action: Paul motions to approve, Don seconds

Motion Carries

Bid from Thyssen Krupp Elevator

Paul: Do we need to vote on this?
Glenn: No, it’s just for your information.

No action needed

 

 

Kathryn Hymel ADK Educational Sorority (Christmas Party): They want the fees waived.

David: We have had requests from this group in prior years and I do not believe it was a Christmas function I thought they were fund raisers.   I believe the first one was not approved and the second one was.  I don’t have my records here

Glenn:  I do not remember, but I will go down and get the records.

David:  Now that I have the records, it was on the same day and this one is for Thursday night just like last years. Are there any Conflicts with the Karate Class?
Kellie Bechtold:  No, not currently.

Don:  What makes this request any different than anyone else who wants to have a party? We can’t just give variances to anyone who wants to have a party.

Dave: The one last year says dinner and silent auction, the one this year says Xmas party.

Ray: Last year we approved it because they were raising money for a charitable cause.

David: They are a ”Not-for-Profit organization and do a lot of fundraising for charitable groups, and last years was a fund raiser, but this year’s description is not showing that.

Lori Surgant 1812: Are they sponsored?
David: Yes they are member sponsored, and they are in good standing.  Don, I think you are 100% on, if it’s just a Christmas party I struggle with waiving the fee, if they were doing it as a fund raiser to benefit the community then I have a completely different opinion.

Paul: Can we call and ask them.

Don:  Is there anyone here from the Sorority?

Scott:  No they are not here.

Scott:  We have a request on the table, do we have a motion to approve.

Action: Dies for lack of motion.

 

Scott:  We have a proposal for out-sourcing the Holiday Times. It is informational only at this time and I have asked Derrick and Ray to head this up and see what is there.

 

David: We took a poll to sell the old truck; we need to get that in the minutes
Scott: We had a 1975 broken down truck that someone gave us $1500 for and we took a poll, Paul, Dave, Derrick and I (Scott) Approved.

 

Open Floor

Lisa Purdy 1302: I have three (3) things.  There is a culvert down from our house that during the rain it holds water. It’s a mosquito breeding ground, if someone could check that out, it’s been a concern of mine for 4 years. The second issue is the dredge; it is blocking our pontoon and us getting to and from home.  The pipe is not marked and is submerged and there is nothing to show that it is submerged except for one buoy. We are not going to be able to get home, I’m curious as to why it’s like that?

Scott: Last year weren’t there lights on it?
Glenn
: We are in the process of doing that.

Lisa:  My third issue is I have a list of License plates, if someone is doing 50 or 60 down Caribbean and who can I give those too?
Scott:
Give them to Glenn .
David:
Are we parking the dredge on the side?
Glenn : We are parking it in the middle.  That is the only way we can do it without tying up peoples boats.
Jim Perotti : We are not complete with the buoys, plus there is a mooring buoy which requires a chunk of steel to keep it away from the shore line. There is a lot of pipe out there and it takes a while to set up.  It will be marked with yellow markers and lights.  We are hoping to get it done tomorrow afternoon.

Conversation Ensues

Ray: That doesn’t sound safe, can we have security go out there to maybe move it back in the middle to prevent something from happening tonight?
Glenn: Yes.

Jim Perotti :  About your mosquito issue we have two people trained by the Department of Public Health trained to treat for misquotes.  All you have to do is call the office.

 

Rebecca Burlingame 1398: I know we spent some time on this already, but Concrete cove is a small cove, I know last year near the end of September the water was down, and that was the reason they could not do Concrete cove I’m wondering how long will it take  concrete cove will be done.

Glenn : About 3 days

Rebecca Burlingame 1398: Is that a consideration to just knock that out of the way before Captains Cove?
Glenn : It was but when I get those pipes out there you can see what impact it has on the lake. If I take that pipe and try to curve into Concrete Cove currently it’s going to mess up the whole east side of the lake and block that whole end of the lake. 

Rebecca:  How long do you feel it will take to do Captains Cove?

Glenn:  It is going to take the whole summer to do Captains Cove.

Conversation Ensues

 

Dave Berkenbile 1190: I emailed photos to you about my basement and the standing water. Jim is going to go and put a culvert to stop the water in the basement but we have a big problem with standing water, with mosquitoes.

 

Gary Sicorum 1189: I’m Dave’s neighbor and I’m here to answer any technical questions.

Scott: What’s the street again?

David: Tampico .  The issue that came about is that the road is Key Largo , They put 2 culverts in there and they drain into a field that is not graded.
Ray: You mentioned that we are already doing something, Jim?
Jim Perotti : They are running into the same problem that is all over Holiday Shores . The drainage was sufficient at one time, when we put the culverts there on Key Largo there where no houses and now there are houses there... Most of them are failing, they are only rated for 25-30 years the subdivision was built in the 60’s, and all the bottoms in the pipes are almost gone. Where we are talking about there is a 15 inch culvert where it was 12 and we are going to go to Two 15 inch culverts.
David: Do you plan on opening up the pipe under San Juan ?
Jim: We are going to have to examine every pipe. There is standing water there and there never was before there were homes. When we put in this Culvert Pipe we are going to have to put in something better.
David: You know why I’m asking?
Jim: It’s dumping into your yard.

David: Your are right!

Conversation Ensues

 

Jim: another problem that we are going to have is the Budget, to go from one road to the next increasing the size all the way.

David: Don’t you need to do that the other way around, cause that’s just moving the problem.

Glenn : That’s true Jim; you would be building a dam at one end basically.

Jim: But you have to know the volume of water that you have coming to determine the size of the pipe, if we start from the lake we won’t know.

Paul: What can we do to try to remedy this situation?
Jim: We have to put another Culvert in like at Key Largo .
David: You’re going to have a real problem if you replace that pipe before you replace the pipe in the road.
Jim: We have to do them all at the same time. 

Conversation Ensues

Scott: Glenn, figure out what the cost and what size pipes you are going to need and the schedule to get this complete.

Glenn : The big thing we need right now is Dry weather.
David: Another thing is that when the house was built up on that, they brought in dirt and raised that house up and created part of that problem because that ditch was a lot wider before that house was there so what happened is they brought in dirt to raise that up and they built that house too low.
Ray: We also need a recommendation of where the money is going to come from.

Conversation Ensues

 

David Berkenbile 1190: I think we also have an issue up by Key Largo ; we are having the same problem. We are getting a lot of stuff there and it needs to be looked at now.
Gary Sikora: This is a time sensitive issue, my neighbor’s basement has been flooded once in the last couple of rains and the culvert has been overwhelmed 3 times in the last year and a half, so time is of the essence.

Scott:  Gentlemen, Glenn is going to put something for us.  The big issue here is the budget.  We have to determine where to get the money. It is recognized it is a problem

Diana Sikora: When it rains the water sits and doesn’t drain and there is mosquitoes and leaches and our kids play out there.

David: You understand that it was that way when you bought it?
Diana: Does it matter?
David: Absolutely it matters.
Diana: Well what about him? He didn’t know that it was going to be like that.

Glenn : Is this the first year you have experienced this problem?

David Berkenbile: No it has happened before; this year just pushed it over the edge. It needs to be graded.
Scott: We are going to take a look at it and get the money for it.

Cathy Berkenbile: Do you know how long it is going to take?

Scott:  Do you have a timetable?

Glenn: I’ve got to look and see exactly what I have before I can get in and see exactly what needs to be done.  We have to make the fix from the lake to the water shed.  I could tell you I will be out there next week and that would be a lie.  I have many priorities for the community and you are one of the highest.  I will get with Scott and figure out what needs to be done but right now I can’t give it to you.

Gary : Can we look into a temporary pump?

Glenn : We don’t have any and we would have to look into renting one.

Diana Sikora: Ok Dave you’re saying that our Builder knew what he was doing, should we go back and fight him?

David: I have been fighting the same thing for the past 4 years.
Diana: What makes yours work and not ours?
David: It doesn’t, I have water that is 4 foot deep and all the way up to my pool. We got 5 or 6 inches of rain the night your basement flooded.

Diana: So from your area it’s flowing to what area?
David: It runs from a culvert under San Juan and goes to the lake.
Diana: Isn’t that the solution?
David: That’s what we have been saying.

Conversation Ensues

 

Cathy Berkenbile: I’m wondering how we can keep the kids safe, the water was rushing through that area.
David: We had a major extreme situation with 5-6 inches of water. But you’re right that culvert is always filled with water and when they built your house they made it worse.

Gary : The standing water on the lots is the issue as well.

David: We don’t own those lots
Glenn : If there are mosquitoes we will come and spray.

Gary : Mosquitoes are not the issue.
Glenn : What do you want me to do?
Gary : I was hoping we could get it graded to the culvert.
Glenn : I can’t go on someone’s property and alter it.

Conversation Ensues

Glenn : We have 2 weeks to the next board meeting and Jim and I we will come down to the properties and walk them with you, discuss it and hopefully we can figure out what to do with it and then get a time line.

Diana: Can we contact the person who owns the property and tell him of the situation?
Glenn : Yes

Gary : With the builders do you implement that you have to have positive drainage?
Glenn : The building rules are there, the impact of drainage is being looked at by the attorney and when we get it back we will have it published in general.

Conversation Ensues

 

Marie Kelting 491: Are you going to fix the beach? It has shrunk again, the ropes and buoys have moved.
David:
We will direct that to Glenn.

Glenn : We will do something about it.

 

Ray motions to adjourn to Executive session, Don seconds.

Motion Carries

 

Reconvene from executive session David Motions Paul Seconds

David Motions to Adjourn, Don Seconds
Motion Carries

 

Meeting adjourned at 9:45 PM

 

Minutes submitted by Don Austin Secretary and Kellie Bechtold

Back To Top


Date:  June 25, 2008

 

 

Attendance:

Board Members

Present: Roger Groth, Scott Webber, David Decker, Don Austin, Ray Garber and Paul Mormino

            Excused: Derrick Richardson

            Quorum Present – Yes

 

Others Present:

            6 Holishor members present

            Glenn Dalton and Kellie Bechtold from Holiday Shores Office

 

Proceedings

Meeting called to order at 7:30 pm by President Roger Groth

Pledge of Allegiance Recited

 

Minutes of June 11, 2008

Action: David motions to approve Scott seconds

Motion Carries

 

Correspondence
B.J. and Stacy Hearty Wedding and Reception in Ballroom, Fire Alarm Problems – Don Austin Reads

Synopsis:  The party was constantly being disturbed by constant ringing of a fire alarm.

Action: The alarm company was contacted and they determined the problem was a faulty sensor and they repaired the faulty sensor.  Glenn is to follow up with the members to convey our apologies for their inconvenience and to inform them that the problem has been identified and repaired.

 

Transfers of Property

Action: Ray motions to approve David seconds

Motion Carries

 

Old Business

Update on Illinois DCEO State Grant

Glenn : One issue that came up was that we had to go through the Attorney General of Illinois and get letter of exemption because we are not a 501C3 tax exempt status. We are a home owner association 1120H.  Unlike a school or a city we do not have a tax exempt status.  As far as this DCEO Grant is concerned we had to be filed with the Attorney Generals Office to get a letter of exemption because we are not a 501C3. We were successful and we got the result yesterday.  Now we are going through two more issues, one is Illinois Department of Natural Recourses and the other is the Illinois Historic Preservation Agency. This does not mean we are automatically approved for the Grant. If we are approved they will not issue funding till we finish the final two which we are in the final phases.

Ray: So the Attorney General gave us a tax exempt status?
Glenn: No, we got an exemption to a tax exemption status for not being one so that we could pursue the grant.

Roger: When are you expecting a decision?
Glenn : Last time I talked to Chris he said he was just waiting on a decision; it should be before the end of this month.

 

           Drainage Rules

Roger: In our packet Glenn has provided us with some verbiage of a discussion on drainage in November.
Paul: Nothing was ever determined with this. It was tabled at the board meeting.

Scott: Memory serves we asked Glenn to find out what Illinois State Law states.

Ray: Yes it was tabled because of legal review.
Roger: I think this is something that just fell off of the table. One of the problems with drainage has nothing to do with home construction. We have at least one instance where people have attached drainage devices to our culverts and that has caused serious problems. I was not only looking for rules on home construction but rules that would prohibit attaching onto our culverts. The one instance I’m thinking of is a vacant lot that the owner has diverted water in an inappropriate manner.
Scott: How do they attach to a culvert under a drive way?
Roger: No, the culvert runs under the street and is directing water under the street. It’s going down what was a natural Drainage to the lake.

Paul:  Between two homes?

Roger:  No what I am referring to is a vacant lot.  If you attach a smaller pipe to the culvert and you restrict the drainage and divert it on to some other property and I was trying to find out what the rules on this issue might be.

Paul:  Another issue is that the elevation some houses are being constructed also cause drainage issues.

Roger:  Yes that is one of the problems but what I am trying to say is that I did not want our attempt to control or restrict drainage be tied to new home permits.

Dave:  This is a proposed change to our current building permit.  Your point is that there should also be a separate rule to control drainage.

Roger:  Yes, because we have no control mechanism because there is no permitting process.  We have to have a prohibition on doing things with our drainage devices in our association. 

Conversation Ensues

Roger: At the next building committee meeting will you and your committee review our drainage rules and bring it back at the next meeting.

Glenn I also want you to contact some other associations and also think about a rule that would prohibit people attaching to our culverts. Let’s try to keep this moving and hopefully have it back by the first meeting in August.

 

      Waste management Contract

Tabled until the next meeting because Waste Management Rep. could not be at this meeting

     

       Ballroom Contract:

Tabled until next meeting because some additional wording need to be added to the contract

 

New Business       

       Holiday Times Profit Center Proposal
Ray: Derrick, myself,
Glenn and Monica who met with Bruce Curry a resident of Holiday Shore . He has considerable experience with running a news paper. He thought that he could help us out.  His main goal was to maximize profit with the Holiday Times.  I think we are loosing about $10,000 budgets wise. We have about $22,000 in expenses and there was an $8000 difference to the negative. He thought he could redesign the Holiday Times appearance, he also proposed to increase the number of issues from 12 a year to 26 a year. In order to do this he was going to hire a sales person who does hourly commission to sell advertising to various entities. He also felt that if he could cut some of our costs, such as printing.

Paul: That’s a contradiction, double production and lower cost?
Ray: That’s a good point, but that’s what he said. He thought that he thinks we could go from a $10,000 loss to an $80,000 profit over the course of three years. The weight as far as personnel you would have one doing the printing and one doing the selling. He would supervise and train, but not for free. I was just trying to get information. Is this something that has to be done over night, can we do this in steps? He said yes we could.

He also said that he would consider helping us out with what we currently have here, teaching us to be better sales people, etcetera.
Roger: The question for me, we, this Board and prior boards have never viewed the Holiday Times as a profit center so to speak. There has never been a real provide motive.  It’s more for community distribution of information? As apposed to it being a profit center?
Ray: Five or Six years ago we were making a profit, and it has been steadily going down.  It looking like this year we could have the biggest lost we have ever had.

Scott: I feel should at least get our Holiday shore times back to break even,

Roger:  This is a pretty hefty dollar proposal, do you feel we are ready to go this far with this proposal.

Scott:  Perhaps we should consider an Ala-carte version.  Print advertising is way down and that reflects the lose, and Web Ads are way up.  Does he have any way expertise to get to get more advertising on the Web?

Paul:   He says he wants to make the times more attractive for the member.  The members are getting it already, it’s not like we are selling it.  It sounds like he is trying to sell the paper and get more publications.  At present our only revenue is from Ads, is that correct?

Roger: Yes that is correct

Paul:  Ray said the revenue has gone down yearly, what is causing this decline in revenue from those Ads in the last six years.

Glenn:  They money is still there it is just a matter of us collecting the money. Also the problem is the economy, and we have a lot of small business advertising base and they are getting hit the hardest and revenues are down.

Don:  Is it down because people are not advertising or are they not paying for their advertising.

Glenn:  We have people who are not paying and also the advertising is down.

Roger: Glenn , if everybody was paid up and current would we still be operating at a loss this year?
Glenn : If things continue the way we are right now it will be about $2000.

Roger: Here is what I would like to do with this issue, first I would like the finance committee to take a look at a past and current financial operations of the Holiday Times, is it a loss in revenue or is it something else.
David: I can tell you right now, your revenues are down and your costs have been cut.
Roger: It’s simply a loss in revenue?
Scott: We had the staff cut cost last year and they did a wonderful job. It’s simply a loss in revenue.
Roger: You know
Glenn we get at least two newspapers from other associations in Illinois , have you ever talked to them about what their structures are for their news papers? Take a look at their publications; ours and theirs are worlds apart. Can we go to them and ask them how they do it?  What is the size of that association and how are they producing a news paper like that. I’m in no hurry for this so please take your time; get back to us in a meeting or two.

 

           Community Use of the Chipper Shredder

Roger: When we first started pursuing the idea of getting the chipper shredder, some of our conversation was whether or not we would want to be able to use the chipper shredder and rent it out to members as a service.  It was never brought to a conclusion for doing that to members.  We thought about setting it up twice a year for a spring and fall cleanup and on special occasions after a bad storm.  It was a discussion item that just fell off of the table.

Glenn : Were very much aware of the staffing we want to use, it would be 2 men and a truck to accept the chips, and we are ready to do that. The only thing we have a question about is do we charge for the chipper shredder, the personnel and the equipment being used besides the chipper shredder and that we have a minimum of a one hour service call.

Dave:  I think the answer to all those questions is yes.
Roger:  I think it has to be fully reimbursable. We have to make sure we are using fully charged hourly rates, fuel and replacement costs of the equipment. There has to be a lot of items in detail to that. We do not want to take a loss on this.
Glenn : Next board meeting I can give you a break out of the entire thing.
Roger: I would also like to see a written proposal of how we execute this, storm cleanup etc. It can’t detract from other base services we can’t say we didn’t fix the road or rake the beaches because we were chipping. Is there anyone opposed to this?
Scott: I’m on the fence on this, to me it’s an amenity like the beaches and the club house that we don’t charge for. Maybe we could do a drop off point and just chip and shred.
Roger: The difference in those two is how it gets from my property to the North Property, who is the Gate Keeper who decides what I get to drop off. I’m trying to provide a means to clean up what they are having a hard time cleaning up.

 

           Clark Boat and Motor use of the lake
Roger
: We had an exciting episode on the lake last week.  In the past we have given approval of putting different craft on the lake for various purposes, but this one was just different. We have specific rules that prohibit race craft. I wanted to put it on the agenda to talk about with this board, because giving them permission to the lake it is up to the lake manager. Does anyone have any information contrary to that?
Scott: Glenn asked us and we said it was up to him.
Roger: I’m pretty sure that this predates any of us here.

Glenn : We have to pre approved each and every one of them
Ray: Is it sometime when they are trying to sell a boat to someone?
Glenn : Most of them are but not this one. He knew it was a special request since it’s a certain type of boat. Clark Boat and Motor services all of our boats and when we have a problem they come right out and fix ours for us. He came to us with a problem, the Mississippi was up and he needed to break in an engine on the race boat. This boat is capable of doing 90-100 miles an hour, the problem that he had he needed an hour to break his engine in, if we said no then he would have to go to Wren Lake and he wanted to do it on a Saturday. I said no, but if you will do Monday morning at 9:00 am supervised then he can do it.

Roger: I was here and observed it, it was not creating a wake, it was not louder then what we have and it did not exceed our speed limit out here. Next time just give us a simple heads up on this, none of us would have quarreled with you on this. It’s just so unique that we would like to know what’s going on so we can answer all the phone calls we get.

 

            Rules for the North Property Pond

Roger: Glenn arranged with the fishing club to get the kids up there to have a Bass Tournament to extract the small and large mouth bass out of there, treat them and get them into the lake.
Glenn: It was in excess of 200 fish in a 3 hour period.
Roger: We had to get DNR approval and we can do it one more time. Glenn would like to do that again in September. Would we like to make this a catch and release only for now to let them continue breeding. No one has caught any other species of fish, but if we could make that a brood pond what was the cost of each?
Glenn: 10-11 inch bass would sell for $75-$100 apiece.
Roger: What we have is a good source to continue restocking our lake. Would we like to make this a catch and release pond by putting up signs and making this a temporary rule?
David: You said we had permission to do this one more time? Can we renew it?
Glenn: Once a year, as long as the association is the sponsor and does the program.
Paul: When they come out to check the lake do they check Su Twan?
Glenn: No.

Paul: Could we get them too?
Glenn : Probably.

 

Conversation Ensues

 

Scott: Do we need a formal rule to be entered in the minutes?

As a board we need rules we have to

Roger As a board we have to provide a set of rules for this pond like the ones for this lake and the Su Twan.

Dave:  We have fishing rules for this lake and also Su-Twan so if we want to enforce we need a set of rules

Roger :  My recommendation would be to set a temporary restriction, on the catch and release, for the board to adopt for the next year.

Scott:  I would likebe to let the fishing committee make the recommendation

Action: Get a recommendation from the Fishing Committee by July 15th

 

         Ski Club Tournament

No Action Required

 

Roger: I noticed that the Ski club docks are anchored at Tamarach beach? Are there any issues from the clubs perspective or the Offices Perspective?

Glenn : None at all.

 

Open Floor

Chris Martinussen 323: Clark Boat and motor, the first thing I want to say is that I want to thank the Board for Volunteering, mostly you ever hear people complaining. The only thing I want to say is that it is strictly prohibited by our rules.  In my opinion it went faster then our speed limit, the answer should have been no. I understand that our business relationship with Clark Boat and motor, but we have to keep our noses clean, we have rules. All the members have rules that we abide by. To see a violation of that extent it defies common sense. One thing I also want to comment one thing is the Fire Alarm system you can have a tech come out and train one of our staff to bypass the alarm system.
Paul: I thought that too because I’m in the business, and for me the fewer people in that system the better.
Chris: The only point I’m making is that we could have someone bypass that. It’s for thought. It is a problem to us too. When we follow all our rules out here our lake manager needs to be an example and so does our board. Thanks for your time.

Allen Campbell 325: I wasn’t here to see the boat, I have Clark Boat and motor do all the work on our boat, they have great skill. I was surprised that we had this type of craft on the lake at all, but none the less my concerned to the board is two fold.  It appeared that the board was not fully aware that this was taking place.  Suppose that I was coming out of my cove on my Sea-doo or boat, was there any safety put in place to ensure that we would not get into the boats way?  What if there was a mishap on the lake? Do we have a legal responsibility to something like this if something does go wrong?   I think the membership should consider the liability.

 

Roger:  Is there anything else.  I will accept a motion to adjourn to executive session.

Don Motions to adjourn to executive session, Paul Seconds 8:50 PM

 

Reconvene from executive session Paul Motions David Seconds

David Motions to Adjourn, Don Seconds
Motion Carries

 

Meeting adjourned at 9:20 PM

 

Minutes submitted by Don Austin Secretary and Kellie Bechtold

Back To Top


Date: July 9, 2008

 

 

Attendance:
Board Members

            Present: Roger Groth , Scott Webber , David Decker , Don Austin, Derrick

Richardson and Paul Mormino

            Excused: Ray Garber

            Quorum Present – Yes

 

Others Present:
            Holishor members present 9

            Glenn Dalton and Kellie Bechtold from Holiday Shores Office

 

Proceedings
Meeting called to order at
7:30 pm by President Roger Groth

Pledge of Allegiance Recited

 

Minutes of June 25, 2008

Action: Scott motions to approve, Derrick seconds

Scott: On page 5, in the middle where it says, Scott: “I would be let to fishing committee” it should be “I would like the fishing committee” instead of let.
Paul: On page 5, it says Chris; ‘The only point I’m making is that we could have someone bypass that. It’s for thought. It is a problem to us too.” Was he just rambling?

Roger: Let’s just leave it the way it is. I believe he was just trying to restate what he had been talking about before hand.

Motion Carries to approve amended minutes.

 

Bills & Salaries

Action: Paul motions to approve, Derrick Seconds

Motion Carries

 

Profit Loss Budget

Action: None needed informational only

 

Transfers of Property

Action: Derrick motions to approve, Scott Seconds

Roger: Initiation fees still continue to be running strong.

Motion Carries

 

Treasurers Report

Given by David Decker

David:  We closed out one repurchase agreement and made another one and extended out to three years trying to make as much money as possible off the reserves.

Action: Scott motions to approve, David Seconds

Motion Carries

 

Mangers Report

Given by Glenn Dalton, Association Manager

 

Security Report

Given by Glenn Dalton Association Manager
David:
Where it says removed signs, did we remove them or did we ask the members to?
Glenn : We asked the members.
Paul:  I know the Alton Telegraph printed a blurb about our fireworks being open to the public; did we have any problems with that?
Glenn : We received numerous calls asking where people could put their boats in. We told them that they had to be a member to put their boat on the Lake . The Alton Telegraph also printed a retraction stating that we are a private community and we checked, yes they were there.

 

Correspondence

Kathryn Hymel AKD Educational Sorority (Christmas Party) and Silent
Auction Request waiver of fees (Second Request)

Don reads the second request letter

Don:  This is the Second request to waive the fees because they did not mention that this was silent auction for charity

Roger:  Scott, Do you recall what this was about in the previous meeting ?

David: It was identified as a Christmas party last time, not a fundraiser.

Action: David Motions to approve the waiver of the fees for this fundraiser, Scott seconds

David: Last time we waived a fee we wanted to make sure that we had a damage deposit. Glenn did we get a check?

Glenn : Yes

Roger: Do we know how many people are actual members of Holiday Shores ? Is that a concern to us?

Paul: I’m looking at the list and I’m on the fence here, how many members of Holiday Shores benefit from these charities?
Conversation Ensues

Derrick: The Oasis Crisis Center in Alton is a center for abused women; I think they might be the only one in the area. We may or may not want to know if some of our members are utilizing this. There may unfortunately be someone in the community of Holiday Shores using this one.
Gerry Theodore 1346: You may have discussed this before, when you do this and waive these fees for these, do they still pay for cleanup and if there is alcohol do they pay for the security?
Glenn : Yes

Motion Carries; 4 For, 1 Against

 

Old Business

DCEO Grant Agreement

Roger: We have talked the past number of months about applying for a State of Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity (DCEO) grant.  This is a grant request we submitted for $150,000 for repairs to the Morning Glory and some other Lake improvement projects.  I am happy to report tonight that I have received a letter of acceptance for Grant #08203765. (Letter is Read by Roger). This is a pretty big deal, and there are a couple of extra steps before the monies start to show up.  There are a couple of Illinois agencies that have to sign off on it yet, one is the Illinois Historic Preservation Agency and the other is the Illinois Department of Natural Resources. Glenn you have asked for the information but have not heard anything back yet correct?
Glenn : Correct.
Roger: We do not see these as a problem or any impediments to the Grant.  We had to respond at the end of the month to get documents signed and they did suggest that we have legal review of the documents.  We had that done after the fact and we have our Law Firms answer to that which I have given to the board members. It’s dated June 8th and should actually be dated July 8th.   I have always been a little unsure of myself on this grant exactly what Fiscal Year funds this is under.  I know the State of Illinois Governor has the Legislature back in special session to approve an unbalanced budget for the upcoming Fiscal year.  I don’t think that any of these funds are caught up in that.  What this will allow us to do, since we have dedicated the initiation funds to be held for the morning glory repair, is to be able to take a look at those reserve funds and reapply them. We are also going to be able to recoup some engineering fees that we have already paid out so there will be operational funds coming to us and that will help us this current fiscal year which is proving to be quite a financial challenge.  This is all good news.

Paul: I know we got the grant at the last minute and I had asked if it says on the letter that we would only pay for costs of April 3, 2008 until December 31, but on the grant it says two years. Did they change that?

Roger: Yes they did.  In our submission we have requested that expenses be covered that are well prior to April 1st.  We checked with them and they said, verbally, that it should not be a problem. It is very clearly documented in our submission so we all believe it will not be a problem.  We do believe that the December 31, 2008 is a binding date however we are allowed to apply for extensions.

Conversation Ensues

Roger: I did want to mention that these funds need to be tracked 100% of the way.   I want the finance committee to sit down with the staff and figure out the best way to apply these funds money and also get our auditors approval.

Scott: I want to thank Glenn and the office and the association members that helped us out in getting this grant.

Roger: We owe Glenn a great deal of thanks for following up with this through Senator Haines office which allowed us to get this grant.

 

            Chipper Shredder for community use

Roger:   This subject goes back awhile.  When we first acquired the chipper shredder through a county grant we said we were going to try to put it to better use for the community.  We asked Glenn to put together a proposal on how he felt we might best use this chipper shredder for the good of the community. 

When I mention this to people I get two schools of thought. One is why do we have to pay anything for this?  The other is can you really deliver on this without negatively impacting other things?
Scott: The question I have is in the middle where it says formulizing two, one week, periods. I mentioned this as a non charge to the community. Is that what that means?

Glenn:  You have got all the combinations in the proposal, it’s up to you guys if we charge or not.

Scott: I’m for having the two, one week periods and it be free.

Roger:  When you say two, one week, periods and you are for this at no charge. Do you mean that the member brings the debris to the street?
Glenn: Yes, It’s by appointment only and the debris that is going to be accepted would have to be brought to the edge of the road.
Scott: In my mind I think it would be better for them to bring it to us in an area up by the North property.  If they want us to go to their house then I believe we should charge for it.
Paul:  Are you going to police the area?  They could drag a tree up there and leave it in the night.  I like the idea of them bringing it to the edge of their property for the one week in the spring and one week in the fall.

Conversation Ensues.

Roger: I thought that the curbside would be better for those who cannot carry it to the North property.

Don:  I like your two weeks or at least a given time frame.  I also feel it should not be free.  I feel that there should be at least a minimal charge, for the men’s time and the cost of fuel.   I also feel it should be regular scheduled times not necessarily for a week at a time but maybe three times at two days each as required.

Dave:  I feel it should be a fully loaded rate. We may have to replace this chipper shredder someday and there is no money in the budget for it.  I feel this is a service for individuals, and you either charge the people that are using it or you charge everybody.  By everybody I mean it comes out of the dues and assessments.

Roger:  I agree with you.  If you look at this year’s budget and next year’s budget there is no money in there for new services.  We need to make this self sustaining.  

Scott: Glen, Do we see a lot of members contracting chipper shredders?
Glenn: That’s hard to answer; we have seen some go to Edwardsville and rent their own. But that is a hard question to answer.
Roger: There are a number of lots with a lot of debris.  I liked the idea of making it easier for them to clean that stuff up.  We have had conversations about limbs down and how it has affected drainage.  From my way of thinking this could be a first step in a few.  If we continue to have problems with debris then we can toughen that up a little bit if we have a cost effective solution to take advantage of, to help people clean up their property.  Also anything that lessens burning is a good step.  We may never restrict burning, but it gives people that don’t want to burn an easy option.

Glenn what wasn’t clear to me is what is a fully recoverable rate for us?
Glenn: For the midlevel employees its $15 an hour.
Roger: What about trucks and gas?
Glenn : I did not work that into the number, but I can.

Paul: This sheet says $187.00 per hour. Is that what you are looking for?

Glenn:  No that is what it cost for an outside crew to come in

Roger: I’m not asking for a vote on this; let’s wait until next month when Glenn can get all the numbers together.

Action Item for old business: For the July 23rd meeting Glenn is to provide a fully recoverable rate pricing for use of Chipper Shredder including trucks, fuel, employees and maintenance (preventive, operational, replacement) factors.

 

Scott:  Just a quick note “Due to some scheduling issue The Ski club tournament will move to Sunday August 17 instead of the 16th

 

New Business

            Variance Request for 1843 Sextant Culvert (OK with building committee)

Chris Pollock 145: I am currently building a new house there.
Action: David Motions to approve the Variance request, Derrick seconds.  

Motion Carries  

 

           

Allied Waste Contract

Roger: Our Allied wasted contract that we signed, in October 2007, had a clause in it for fuel escalation if fuel goes over $3.00 per gallon.  The contract went into effect in October of 2007.  We have received a notice from Allied waste to reopen that contract. We will be working on that in the next few months. There is a downside to this that if Diesel went down below $2 we could reopen, but it went up so they are reopening to negotiate prices again.

 

            Rainfall and Flooding

Roger:  The last thing I want to mention is, with the heaviest rainfall in the history of weather records, in the first six months this year, we have experienced the highest degree of flooding and drainage problems we have ever seen and with the more homes that have been built the problems have gotten worse.  The homes built in low lying lots, where there had been natural drainage, have altered the drainage and is contributing more problems.  Virtually all of our culverts were installed in the mid to late 1960’s and they are beyond their life expectancy and they are failing.  We replaced a culvert at the corner of Christmas Tree point and Shore Drive SW.  When the crew went in to excavate it they found the culvert was rotted out and had been cut through to run utility lines.

Glenn: They had the gas line above it and the water line below it. When they put the gas line in they cut the top out of the culvert pipe.

Roger: We have asked the staff to take a look at a long range Culvert repair plan, Glenn is going to look at it with the road plan and depending on how our roads are looking we are going to possibly have to look at a 3 year replacement plan.

After the severe rain this weekend I went out and drove the community and literally five roads were under water because drains were backed up.  This is not a new issue but its getting worse. This time when I drove the development after the rain there were a lot of areas that are much worse off than was thought.  I just wanted to mention this for the board members knowledge, so they know that’s where we are headed.

 

Open Floor

Mike Butler 1313 Caribbean :  I live in a home I purchased in October. I’m the guy with the sandbagged garage.  I have been flooded 7 times. My basement is currently under construction because of water damage.  I get street drainage.  During a heavy rain you can stand at my front door and watch it come down my driveway right into my garage. The lot next door is a pond because of my drainage. At the worst point we had 5 inches of water in the garage.  The culvert is collapsed. I came to Glenn and talked to him about it. He told me to come down and talk about it. It’s worse than saturation, and I am looking for a new culvert. On the top of that culvert make it slotted so that it drains off the road.

 

David Berkenbile 1190:  I have also been flooded; I have currently been begging for this for several weeks.  I came to a board meeting, I have 104 pictures dating back to 2004 and this problem is escalating. What else do I need to do?
Roger: Where we are at with the watershed that is impacting you is; we have intentions to replace the culverts at
Tampico and at San Juan .  We are going to look at that water shed in its entirety.  We are not going to do what has been done in the past by only doing one thing that seems to work upstream and causes problems down stream.  We want to do whatever we are going to do with that watershed right the first time. We are getting an engineer to look at this.  We are going to walk that watershed with the engineer tomorrow and have him advise us as to what we need to do.   I also want to see if that will solve your problem entirely.  What I am also looking for is, before we accept the cost to fix it, we need to know if there is something the homeowners also need to do about it.   The home you bought was built in an old watershed.

Cathy Berkenbile 1190: Did the builder know that when he built the house?
Roger:  The Association does not deal with that level of technicality, the county does. We don’t offer opinion on the drainage system that is
Madison County .  As for the builder I do not know if he knew about the water shed.

David Berkenbile: The culvert that was built above us did the board approve it?

Roger: The board does not sit here and say, this street gets a culvert and that one doesn’t. If it goes over budget then they come to us but not any other time. I don’t know when that particular culvert was done.

Conversation Ensues

 

Jeannie Votruba 493: I just want to let you know those board members that were not aware that after the ski show they had the Wii drawing after the Ski Show. It was Josh Crider of Godfrey. I also wanted to say that Kellie was not there and it was her boyfriend.

I had a lot of people tell us that the fireworks were beautiful this year.

I did have one person complain that it was rude of our members to shoot off their own fireworks during the show.

Roger: It was a pretty doggone good fire works display.

Adjourn to Executive session.

Action:  Paul motions, Scott seconds.

Motion carries @ 8:45 PM

 

Adjourn to Regular meeting

Action:  Paul motions, Dave seconds

Motion carries @ 9:05 PM

 

Reconvene Regular meeting

Action:  Paul motions, Dave seconds

Motion carries @ 9:05 PM .

 

 

Minutes submitted by Don Austin Secretary and Kellie Bechtold

Back To Top

 


Date: July 23, 2008

 

Attendance

Board Members

            Present: Roger Groth , David Decker, Don Austin, Ray Garber , Paul Mormino
            Excused: Derrick Richardson
            Late:
Scott Webber
            Quorum Present – Yes

 

Others Present

            Holishor members present 12

            Glenn Dalton and Kellie Bechtold from Holishor Office

 

Proceedings

Meeting called to order at 7:45 pm

Pledge of Allegiance Recited

 

Minutes of July 9, 2008

Action: David motions to approve, Ray seconds

Motion Carries

 

Correspondence

            Gary P. Grubb 254 Shore Drive SW : Drainage Problem

Don Austin reads letter

Referred to New business

 

Old Business

            Allied Waste Contract

Roger: Last month we had the fuel increase in the contract cost. David and Paul have been working on that with Allied waste, we will discuss this at the next meeting

No Action needed, hold till next meeting.

 

            Brood Pond North Property

Roger: We decided to wait for the fishing committee to recommend if we should make this a catch and release pond only.  The Gentlemen from DNR are telling us that we should not look at it as a potential brood pond. We will have him Shock it in 2010 and continue to extract the smaller bass out like we did this spring with the kids fishing tournament. The fishing committee recommendation is to keep the same regulations on the pond as have on main lake and SuTwan.  We would like to keep the big bass in the North Pond.

David: Do we need to propose a rule change?
Roger: No I don’t.
Ray: Scott was working on some type of rule change, he sent out an email.
Glenn hands out the email

Ray: My only question is there another rule that deals with the crappie situation?
Glenn: The way that Scott is taking this is, if you look down at the third paragraph of the new rule, basically he went into the old rule and changed the wording. The committees recommendation is to just keep the creel limit the same at both of the ponds and the lake.

Conversation Ensues

Roger: One other significant change and that’s in Scotts proposal is that no BB guns or pellet guns shall be discharged in Holiday Shores .

David: One other change in the rule is that Holiday Shores is a Wild life sanctuary and no animals are to be killed. Which means I can’t kill my moles? The other part is that there will be no warnings issued, the person will be fined and the creel will be released.

Roger: I don’t get the pellet guns or BB guns.
Glenn: Some pellet guns or BB gun can be pumped up to the same power as a 22.

Roger: What does it mean if we are a Bird and Wildlife sanctuary?
Glenn : It means you can’t hunt or kill animals in Holiday Shores .

Roger: Are you trying to deal with the issue where someone killed or shot geese with pellet and BB gun’s?
Glenn: Yes, we have people shooting Pellet and BB guns out of their windows at domesticated white ducks and IDNR will not touch it because they are domesticated.

Roger:  I want everybody to look this rule change over and let’s have Scott change it to include creel limits and I expect a new version in next meeting packets.    Let’s get back to this at the next meeting after everyone looks it over.
No action necessary to be discussed at the next meeting.

 

            319 Grant
Roger: On the 319 Grant that we were meeting on with the engineers downstairs I need to know where to go with this.  The way I look at it, and I will go with the $120,000 version because I think it is more attainable than the $150,000 version. If I look at all they are proposing it’s all being worked professionally, it’s got all the engineering estimates in it, and I am convinced that everything in that proposal would benefit the lake.  That’s $120,000 out of pocket to build the 2 wetlands and clean out silt retention ponds, shore up streams, and start an educational process that will take us to a watershed program in the future. The question becomes, is it worth it to us, the association, to spend $120,000 to create 2 wetlands, clean out silt retention ponds, and shore up streams, or do we want to drop back and create the 2 wetlands, clean out the pits and just do it ourselves without contractors and see how close to $120,000 can we come.  I guess those are the questions, Do we want to pursue the cost reimbursable nature of a 319 Grant or do you want to do it ourselves and hope to come in under $120,000?   Or do you want them to submit more information to go over and we wait to submit it in October of 2009.  Personally I prefer to see us make the request and if it is approved we go from there. Its like the DCEO Grant that we got, the whole meaning of that thing gets nailed down in that actual document. I think this one is similar in nature to that.

Paul: I thought the DCEO Grant we had to have line itemized with every (i) dotted and (t) crossed?

Roger: It’s not any more specific than this proposal; maybe it’s more specific than this one page we are looking at tonight.
Paul: I want to go forward with this; I am in favor of going for even option 2A; we are looking at $30,000 difference out of pocket. I’m looking at percentages; we are going from 35% to 50% more removal of silt.  The way we could propose it is water quality and we have 2 years to complete it from the time we sign the document.

Roger:  You have two years from the date you sign the contractual document.

Ray: I agree with Paul, I think 2A is best, I think the engineer was stating that there is an additional 10% retention of silt with 2A and that contributes to them accepting our application. One question that I have is the $20,000 for engineering that may come out of it and we should challenge her to take another look at the number to give us a range or to see if it is even less.  Then the second question is the financing issue, which is $25,000 to $30,000 more to go to 2A. I believe we have enough time to look it over before we sign the contract and to look at our funds and say never mind if we can’t afford it.

In the long range the more silt we can keep out will improve the quality of the water by removing the manganese and phosphorous as well as lower the cost of our future dredging costs.

Roger:  I would like to clarify the differences between Options 2 and 2A.  Option 2A gives us a 56% reduction in tonnage of silt that comes in, and that includes our existing silt pond.  The option 2 gives about 45% including our existing silt pond.  Option 2 cost $120,000 and 2A costs $150,000 out of pocket 

Conversation Ensues

Don: I pretty much agree with Paul, except I’m leaning toward option 2. However I am new to this project and need to study this some more.  I’m going to walk the property with Glenn tomorrow so I can get a better idea of the magnitude of is project.

Glenn: One of the things you all should consider is when dealing with the EPA, specifically EPA streams, once we go for Option 2 and receive the grant for that and later decide to do 2A you will have to go for another permit to do that because are going to alter that stream.

Dave:  Aren’t we required to get a permit for the work we are doing now?

Glen: Yes we are and we are doing that now as part of this request.

Dave:  Based on what was described to me downstairs tonight, I am rather cautious about the whole thing.   I am 100% behind the idea of pursuing the 319 Grant, but where I struggle is the $120,000 to $150,000 that we are going to have to identify a source for, in a budget where we are already tight.  Another issue is the terms of wetland and wild life sanctuary.  All along we have been talking about building silt ponds and retention basins and now this proposal calls it wetlands and wildlife bird sanctuary.  Those terms concern me very much. When you call something a wetlands & bird sanctuary you set yourself up for another set of rules and regulations. These wetlands are going to consume enough property to not allow us not to use it for what we wanted to do with it.  I liked the idea of setting up a watershed and working with the local farmers.  It seems to me that we are in an awful rush.  The North property ideas have been around for a year and then this proposal was given to us 7 days before it is due and the cost has more than doubled.   

Roger:  What would you propose we do?

Dave:  My proposal is to continue to look at what we want to do and identify what is a wetland.  The stream management person that was downstairs tonight said we have a lot better chance of getting this grant if we have a watershed program in place and I think we should get the association members buy in on spending $120K to $150K.

Roger:  I had always intended taking this to the membership and I believe that can happen if we get grant approval in 2009. 

Dave:  So what you are proposing is that we pursue the Grant and we do not sign the contract unless membership approves at the annual meeting.

Roger:  If we want to make that our position then I will go for that.  That sounds fair

Conversation Ensues

Roger: Let me see thumbs up on how many of you would go with option 2A

3 for 2A

Roger: Would it satisfy your concerns if we ask the membership before we sign the contract.  We would submit the contract in August but it would state that we could not enter into a contract until the membership has voted on it.

Glenn: Let me research this but I don’t think that they will accept our application if we don’t have the authorization. I will get back to you on that.

Roger: If it turns out that way there is no way that we can do it this year.
Ray: Or you can call a special meeting, or work on getting approval to expend next year.

Roger: What kind of level of detail would we have to put before the membership before we submit it?

Conversation Ensues

Roger: Glen we need you to do some further research on this question. Let me know tomorrow and I will consult the board members in a special meeting.

           

Ballroom Contract

Roger: Are we able to look at the contract tonight? Glenn said that Scott went over it with Angie, are we able to look at this tonight.

David: The copy Scott sent to me is not current

Don:  I had some questions.
Roger: I take it we are not ready so we will discuss it later

 

            Chipper Shredder

Roger:  The last time we discussed making the chipper shredder available for membership use at a fee to them we had asked Glenn to look at fully loaded rates. The sheet you have in front of you shows $63.38/ hour with two staff personnel operating it.  Glenn will have to publicize this service, at this price, for certain times of the year and during significant storm damage because he will not be staffed to do this unless it is scheduled.  We need to decide if we going to offer this as a fee service to the membership.
Don: Would this fee also be used for storm damage.
Roger: Glenn thinks that he would advertise it for a week in spring and fall and if there was a storm then with adequate time he could offer it then as well for this price. Do we want to give this a go or not.

Ray: The time period would be like, November and March?
Glenn: Yes that would be a prime time for that.

Roger:  Do we want to do this

Don: I’m for it.

Dave: We need a motion.

Don:  I motion we approve the $63.38 presented by Glenn for use of Chipper Shredder and to authorize Glen to advertise rates and times in the paper for  Spring and Fall clean up dates.  Also include in the motion that the fee be for authorized Storm damage clean up.

Paul: I stated last meeting that we talked about a drop off point for this at the North Property and I’m not in favor of this being charged.

Paul: If you’re going to charge people to do this then I believe people will burn the stuff.

Don: This is not in concrete; if it doesn’t work then we can re-discuss this at another time.

Roger: I’m just advocating trying it to see if people go for it.

Motion Carries

3 Yes 1 No.

 

New Business

            Noise Abatement

Roger: We have gotten what I will call renewed complaints about bands that were here on the 4th of July. We are getting noise complaints about the bands at the Marina . What I want us to do tonight is just to talk through what we want the association’s response on noise to be.  I had Glenn pull the Madison County rules on noise. What you can see from reading this is that it relates to noise emanating from bands and such. Any sound which causes an annoyance or disturbance and those kinds of things, but there is nothing that quantifies it to any degree. If someone complains and they send an officer out to respond, it is up to the officer to decide if it is obnoxious. Another thing of note is this other thing about a quiet time.

 The way this has been working here is that if our public safety officer gets a call about noise disturbances, he will go to the location and decide if it is at a nuisance level. Is that correct Glenn?

Glenn: On the land yes, on the water we have a way to measure it.
Roger: On land what do we do?
Glenn: We contact the member and ask them to turn it down. If they don’t we call
Madison county.
Roger: What is there response to this?
Glenn: Depends on their work load, if it’s an emergency they respond quickly but if it’s just a dog barking they may not get here for a long while.

Scott: What is our ability to act as an agent; I have heard people talk about that. Can our officer’s act as an agent for Madison County .

Glenn : We can witness the fact that a dog or something is making noise and tell Madison County but that’s all we can do.

Conversation Ensues

Roger: Back to the Bands at the Marina . Have you handled any of this Glen?
Glenn: We went down to the complaints specifically on the 4th of July weekend. In that instance it was not the
Marina it was an adjacent neighbor. I didn’t think it was that excessive so we didn’t do anything about it.

Roger: Have you had any complaints about anything but the 4th of July.
Rob: Yes we have gotten complaints about the
Marina or bands. If it is them we call them and ask them to turn it down and they will. I have never had a problem with them.

Scott: Are they late at night?
Rob: I have had them at noon with a radio on a pontoon; I’ve had one at 2 in the afternoon, all times of the day.

Roger: So if we get noise from a boat we get the decibel meter and if it’s over 76 we tell them to turn it down, if its not then we don’t respond? 

Glen:  Yes

Roger:  Glen do you feel we really need a specific standard for noise complaints that are land based.
Glenn: Yes we do. I really want to take it to where the officers do not have to make a subjective decision. Everyone here knows that I don’t have the best hearing and everyone’s hearing is different.  We have a non subjective method on the water and I would like that on the land also.

Roger: Is there a standard that exists someplace?
Glenn: We are researching it and we have not found any.

Roger: At this time are there any members in attendance who would like to take the stand and comment on a noise problem please do so.

Denise Georgeff 98 Shore Drive :  The specific complaint on the 4th of July you talked about was from me and my husband and we have filed numerous other complaints about noise, from the music on the weekends, from the Marina .  On a cool night like tonight I can’t leave my windows open and sleep.  When we moved out here it was just a marina and now it’s a bar in our neighborhood.  Nobody wants to be subjected to that, its lowering property values, who wants to buy a property with a bar in the back yard.

I do apologize it was not the Marina on July 4th, but that noise did continue late into the night.  I think we need to stop allowing microphones and amplifiers.  I am hoping that the associating can come up with a ruling to reduce the noise level.

Roger: As far as the marina being a bar and it was not at one point,  We want to make sure you understand it is private property and a private business and the only restrictions that exist are the restrictions in the original deed to that property and it does not give us a great deal of control over them.   It states if they were to use it for anything other than a marina and to use the example of selling food which happened some time ago.   The liquor license was not through us it was through Madison County .

Denise:  How did that come about?

Roger:   Keep in mind it is a private business and the liquor license was through Madison County .  That’s how it came about.  It was not a process that we were necessarily engaged in. It was publicized and there were hearing posters at the time and there was minimal opposition to it.

Denise:  I can understand that, people that don’t live on a cove will not care about the noise.  He advertises in the Holiday Times, that he is part of the Holiday Shore Association, but a separate business, so I guess I’m unclear as to why we do not have any control over what he does.

Roger:  Glen, What exactly control do we have over the Marina ?

Glenn:  I’ve got the deed downstairs and it does limit our power and it’s mostly to what they can sell. They are in compliance.
Paul: There is also a limit for construction that has to go through the board of directors.

Ray:  There is something in regards to food. For them to honor their deed restrictions they have to give us a written request to serve food. We gave them permission for one year if I recollect. I don’t know if any letters have come through in 2007.
Roger: Let’s do a little more research for the next meeting.

Denise: I do hope we can take into consideration what we can do to keep the noise level down.

Paul: Was it after 9 or 10 pm??
Denise: Yes it was after 11.  I did contact the district attorney and Kent Scheibel. I would like to get this resolved in a neighborly manner, be polite about it. Can we just ask them? Do they really need an amplifier?  We have always gone through security and
Madison County , Madison county says it’s our problem, Security says it’s Madison County .
Paul:
Madison County said that we approve it?  That troubles me.

Glen:  That is why I want our officers not to have to make a subjective call on these noise issues.  I want a level such as is on the water.   Then we call Madison County .

Roger:  I think before we can say yes to the decibel meter we need to know what that level might be. See if you can find some organization using this method.

Conversation ensues

 

Roger: Glen, for the next meeting. 

  • I want you to have reviewed the Deed restrictions. See if there is anything in there that matches Ray’s recollection. Bring us all up to speed on that.
  • I would like to work this issue with
    Madison
    County
    , and talk to them about how it’s our problem. That is, if a resident makes a complaint to them and they say it is OK with the Association I have a problem with that response. 
  • Talk with the
    Marina
    and let them know about the complaints and see if can get a favorable response.
  • Continue your search for an acceptable decibel level and if there is someone who is using the method.  

 

New Business

Fireworks
Roger:  Glen has received complaints about private fireworks displays and debris falling on boats and land.  I sent all the board members an email asking for your response on this issue and since this time Glen has gotten an article from the Fire Department which will be in the next issue of Holiday Times

Roger: Glen: It is my understanding that you and the staff are working that area, does this need any action.

Conversation ensues

Glenn: We are looking at all of the community; it is not just in one place it is all over the place. I would like to go to the Holiday Shore Fire department and try to find out their view point on the extra fireworks and get a determination on what we need to do.

 

Gary P. Grubb 254 Shore Drive Drainage problem

Roger:  Glen, it is my understanding you and staff are looking this problem

Glen:  Yes we are working on this problem as well many others within the community.  This drainage issue not just in one place it is all over the community.

 

 

Open Floor

Cheryl Laton 1148: I have some concerns about the water drainage at my driveway and the lot next to my house and across the street.  I contacted Jim Perotti back in May and they thought it was a main water line break. Then later it was determined it was from a water slide I use on my property for day care kids, but I discussed with them that doesn’t consist of water just setting there or flowing through there.  Nothing more was discussed that day and later on I had water damage again on July 3rd.   I lost all my new carpet that I had just replaced.  I feel like Holiday Shore is responsible because they did not act on the water drainage problem.  My concern now is what is going to be done about the water drainage problem. I called Madison County and they said that we needed to talk to you guys.  I’m really overwhelmed at this time and I don’t know what to do about it or who to contact.

Roger: Our place is to have the association look at it and see if we can do something about it. We got your letter but it was not submitted in time for tonight’s agenda so we have no answers right now.   There is not a standard answer for this problem because all issues are different.  You have to realize that this year for the first six months was the heaviest rainfall in the history of keeping records and we have had multiple amounts of flooding.  We will have Glen and staff work on the issue and give you some response at some point in the not too distant future.  That is all I can really offer to you at this point.

 

Jeannie Votruba 493: I have lived out here since 1979. When I move here there were 450 homes.  I live at the South end of the community and we were able to hear bands playing at the clubhouse. The noise carries over water very well.

With the fireworks, my concern is not that the private people doing their own fireworks had a permit and a licensed technician, but I would ask that they wait to have their shows after our main show is done. It was said that our main show was hard to enjoy because they were firing theirs off at the same time.

 

Allan Fremont 1917:  This past Saturday my kids were enjoying the lake in the evening, they had 3 Holishor boats approach them. There were 2 pontoon boats on either side with the john boat circling with 5 state police officers and search lights in the intent of a safety check.   They had to take a breathalyzer test even though there was not alcohol or drugs on the boat.  My kids called me and told me after it happened.  I called the Security guy and he said that he knew, I said if there was any damage to my boat I would contact them. The next day I found a 1.5 - 2 ft scratch on the boat.  The police officer I talked to that night said they would take care of it.  When I talked to the State Police the next day they said it was the person driving the boat who was responsible.  I talked with Glen and then left two messages with your safety patrol and they have not responded.

Roger: If you’re talking to Glenn you are talking to the Safety officer’s management chain so that’s the top.  Any policing authority has jurisdiction over us, we can’t tell them you can’t come here because they can. With the State Police they have targeted our general area. They have serious concerns about underage alcohol and drug use in the area.  They have arrested numerous people. They have put together a task force to curtail the amount of underage drinking and drug use in the area.  When a law enforcement agency contacts us and tells us what they are going to do they ask if we wanted to be a party to it or not.  What happens in this arena is our public safety officers have no law enforcement powers at all?  But when they have to respond to member’s complaints to certain activity, vandalism and what not, they are the ones making the reports to the Sheriff.  It’s generally been the reaction lately we are going to participate. In this case they used our boats. From what I understand they were put through exactly what everyone else was put through.  They were targeting kids.  They pulled over many kids and people leaving the Marina .  That’s why they gave the kids a breathalyzer. They made another number of stops and they ignored a number of infractions and did not ticket them.  That’s their choosing.  If you believe we are responsible for damaging your boat we will entertain a request to make your boat whole and we will decide what we feel might be right in this case.  Glen, what would be the action for fixing his boat?
Glenn : Write a letter to the board of directors and state your claim.

Paul:  Is the boat your biggest complaint?
Allen: I have problems with the State Police is the way it was done. There were only two kids in the boat and they had 5 officers standing on my seats with boots.  I don’t even let my kids on the boat with sandals or shoes.  I moved out here in 72 with my parents. This was extreme.  This was complete harassment of the kids.

Kim Fremont 1719: When we called to inquire at the association office about the process of trying to find out what to do about this. We did not get a lot of help.  If we had been told to write a letter to the board we would have done it.  I think the response from the folks in the office should be to find out what happened, get our name and number instead of just take it up with the State Police.

Glenn :  Was your child driving the boat?
Kim:  No, but he had a boaters safety card.
Glenn :  Is he on your member designee list?
Wife:  No. I’m here to support the rules but you need to be respectful.

Roger: I think that if I had gone through this I would be as frustrated as you are. We will see what can be done.  

 

Scott Motions to go to executive session, Paul Seconds.
Motion Carries

 

Reconvene from Executive session to regular meeting

Scott Motions,      Paul Seconds.

Scott Motions to adjourn from regular session,   Paul Seconds.
Motion Carries

 

Meeting adjourned at 9:50

 

 

Action Items for next meeting

Glen,

  • Review the Marina Deed restrictions. See if there is anything in there that matches Ray’s recollection. Bring us all up to speed.
  • I would like you to work on this issue with
  • Madison
    County
    , and talk to them about how it’s our problem. That is, if a resident makes a complaint to them and they say it is OK with the Association I have a problem with that response. 
  • Talk with the
    Marina
    and let them know about the complaints and see if can get a favorable response.
  • Continue your search for an acceptable decibel level and if there is someone who is using the method.
  • Response to Cheryl Laton 1148 drainage problem.

 

Scott,

  • Ball room Contract
  • Fishing committee rules change rewrite

 

 

 

Minutes submitted by Don Austin Secretary and Kellie Bechtold

Back To Top


Date: August 13, 2008

 

Attendance

Board Members

            Present: Roger Groth, Derrick Richardson, Ray Garber, Don Austin,

            Scott Webber, David Decker and Paul Mormino

            Quorum Present: Yes

 

Others Present

            Holishor Members Present 7

            Glenn Dalton and Kellie Bechtold from Holishor Office

 

Proceedings

Meeting called to order at 7:30 PM

Pledge of Allegiance Recited

 

Minutes of July 23, 2008

Action: Derrick motions to approve, Ray seconds

Discussion ensues for some amendments

Motion carries to approve Amended minutes

 

Bills & Salaries

Action: Scott moves to accept & Derrick seconds

Ray: Bill for $28,710 for asphalting 3 cul-de-sacs at some point we should try to bid those out again right?

Glenn: Yes

Motion carries

 

Transfers of Property

Action: Ray moves to accept & Derrick Seconds

Motion Carries

 

Managers Report

Given by Glenn Dalton

Roger: Are we soliciting bids for the morning Glory?
Glenn: Yes
Paul: When do we expect those bids to come back
Glenn: I hope this month
Roger: I would like to see the invitation to bid.

 

Security Report

Given by Rob Simmons

 

Correspondence

            Cheryl Layton Drainage problem

Read by Don Austin

Action: Discuss in New Business

 

 

Denny Frank - Request for sign variance

Read by Don Austin

Action: Discuss in New Business

 

Runoff water – Tracy Ferguson

Read by Don Austin

Action: Discuss in New Business

 

Holiday Shores Ski Club – Chris Getsfred Saturday Sep 13 Ski Show

Read by Don Austin

Action: Discuss in New Business

 

Treasury Report

Given by David Decker

David: The most significant change is the decrease in our operating funds.  We had a significant hit as result of the road efforts.  We still have the money reserved for the interest payment on the loan and the morning Glory reserves are $77,031.

Roger: Where are we with the Budget Scrub?
Ray: I have been working with Glenn and I have all the information on income and expenses tomorrow. Once I get that information together how do we proceed?
David:  Ray, you and I should review, and then we pull the finance committee together and go over it.
Roger: Some time ago we talked about having the Board looking at Accounts Receivable and we had Joyce Kirby looking at that. What was the outcome of that?
David: I have not seen any results on that. I will check with Joyce and find out.

Action: Paul Moves Ray seconds to approve the treasury report

Motion Carries

 

Old Business

Allied Waste

Paul:  On July 9th per Allied Wastes request, they came to us requesting a 3 percent increase in there trash and recycling rate. On there letter it was stated that the cost of diesel has risen over 66% in the last 12 months. I have talked to them and they have agreed to lock us in for a 3% increase effective October 1, 2008 until July 31, 2009 the cost will increase from $14.99 to $15.44 I was ok with that. I asked if we could g ahead and lock in a 3% increase effective from August 1, 2009 until July 31, 2010 . They got back after awhile and stated that would be fine. I asked if we could raise our “Low Water” mark from $2.00 a gallon to $3.00 a gallon. They called me back and said that would be suitable to them.

This increase is only on trash and recycling pickup, this does not affect any of the other charges i.e. Yard waste and 90 gallon Container charges. The annual Charges for the first year would be only 10 months times $.45 which is $4.50. The annual charge for the last year of this contract would be 12 months times $.46 with is $5.64. My personal opinion is that we take this; I think the price of fuel will not be going down like we all want it to. If you were to look at our original contract it had a water mark of $3.00 per gallon if it went higher then that they would like to come to us a review this with us. When I spoke with her (Robin Karlas) she said the last time they purchased fuel it was at $4.78 a gallon. To me $.45 a month is not that much of an increase neither is $.47 a month for the second year is not either. Today I visited the website and the average price of diesel in the Midwest was $4.58

 

 

Conversation Ensues.

Action: Derrick Motions to approve this revision Paul seconds

Motion Carries

For 5 Against 1

 

Fishing Rules

Scott reads hunting and fishing Suggested Revision

Roger: If we the Association are going to have a size or creel limit different from Illinois who makes that decision for the association.
Scott:  The board of directors.  We have a rule of 20 crappie 8 inches in length, and we set aside the rule for no limits on crappie. Do we need to specify in here if specified in the IDNR regulations?
Roger: If our rules are the same as
Illinois then we do not need to state them in there.  Whenever we have a size or a number different than Illinois it needs to be in a rule. We, the Board need to be the ones amending the rule. Like the temporary suspension of the Crappie.

Ray: Is there a state regulation for here?
Roger: The State has size limits depending on the body of water, as long as we are posting the same limits as
Illinois we are covered, but let’s say we want to restrict the Small Mouth Bass, would we have to write it in this rule. We want the ability to enforce this rule ourselves rather than IDNR.  

Glenn: I will check the rules and regulations from the IDNR for the next board meeting and the fishing committee so we can incorporate into the rules.

Roger:  The last 2 sentences on the proposed wording about No fishing from private properties or others docks without permission, and that no warnings will be issued for violations etc. All creels will be seized and released are new.

Glenn: yes
Scott: Do we have a fine system set up for fishing violations.

Glenn: No

Roger:  If we are going to make these rules we need to get the linkage to these fines set up to enforce these rules.  

Glenn:  I will write the linkage and have it ready for next meeting.

Action:  Deferred to the next meeting.

 

            Ballroom Contract

Scott: There are two issues outstanding on this; one is the required non refundable security fee for any party with alcohol regardless of party size. Number 2 is an accounting issue, we voted to raise the deposit limit to $400.00 and this is causing problems with our accounting and it has been recommended that we lower it back down to $325.00.  I recommend doing that as a simple fix till we figure out how to make it work.

Conversation Ensues

Action:  Paul motions to approve this contract with Reservation fee of $325.00 and a Security Guard fee for all parties with Alcohol,   Derrick seconds

Motion Carries

 

            Cheryl Layton Drainage problem

Action: Glenn to contact Cheryl Layton and ask her to attend the next meeting to pursue her request.

 

Noise level

Glenn is still pursuing.  It is still a work in process.  .

 

New Business

            Ski Club Fall Show

Roger: The Docks are still at Tamarach Beach , when you pull out the Dredge are they going to move them back to ski beach?
Glenn: Yes

Henry Halverson 1829: Are they permanently removing the Dredge for the year?
Glenn: Yes
Henry: Then we have no reason to stay at Tamarach
Scott:  The only question I have about the date and that is a huge Wedding reception here this year on that date and there is an issue on Parking.
Roger: Are you planning on using Music and Announcements?
Henry: Yes

Roger:  I’m a little worried about the ballroom function starting at that time and the sound functions interfering with the other. Would you consider starting early, like at 3 instead and going till 5?

Henry: Yes
Action: Don Motions to approve the Ski Club Fall Show from
3-5 pm on Sept 13, Ray seconds

Motion Carries

 

Denny Frank - Request for sign variance

Glenn: Denny lives out by Prairie Town Road , it’s a lot just off of it. His house sets back off the Highway 150 about 200 feet, it’s as you turn in the Gate, about 75 Feet.

David: So the front of his house faces Tamarack and the back is to Prairie Town road.
Action: Scott Motion to approve the for sale Sign in the Truck for 30 days Derrick Seconds

Conversation Ensues

Motion fails.   For 0 Against 6

 

Request fro H.S.V.F.D waiver of Ballroom fees

Much conversation ensues

No Vote at this time, Deferred to next meeting

 

Write-Off – 949 Catalina – Foreclosure

Ray: I see where they filed a Chapter 13 and some creditors are being paid off. How do we respond to those or did we get a letter from them?
Glenn: We follow those guide lines that we had an attorney prepare for us. These people lost the property.
Roger: They have been indebt to us since 2004.

Scott: I have received calls from this person in the past, I have seen them at meetings and just a reminder that only members in good standing are allowed here.

Conversation Ensues

Action: Paul Motion to write off $1476.31, Derrick seconds.

Motion Carries

 

            Write-Off – 1248 Reno Court – Bankruptcy

Action: Scott Motion to write off $1742. 29, Derrick seconds

Motion Carries

 

            Write-Off – 1208 Key Largo – Foreclosure

Action: Hold until Next meeting

 

IDNR Boating Safety

Glenn: The big thing that our community should be aware of is that the IDNR is coming out to our lake with the primary focus of boater’s safety.  We are having some safety issues on the boats.  There is a good reason that there is safety equipment required on boats.  IF one get into an emergency situation and don’t have that equipment it can be devastating.  It’s not like having an accident on the ground, your boat is on fire or sinking and if people are unconscious and don’t have a life preserver on and that can be catastrophic.  I believe the association should be the first ones that step forward and assure that our boaters have this equipment.
Rob: I was surprised what they found when they came out.  The first boat we pulled over did not have IL numbers, lot numbers, fishing without license, no horn or whistle, fire extinguisher or even a life preserver.  One boat had a baby in a car seat with no live jacket. It’s also a state law that no PWC is to be operated after dusk.  I was told when I first got hired that I am not allowed to check for certain things. I now want to know if I am allowed to check for safety items on the boats.

Paul: Didn’t you say you were going to get a list together of everything we need to be safe.
Rob: Yes, and it is the Holiday Times this month, but I think the best thing everyone should do is go to the IDNR website and take the boaters safety Class on line. You do not have to pay as long as you do not take the test.

Conversation Ensues

Roger: We need to review our current boating rules and see if we have the IDNR safety requirements for our boats.  We need to start publicizing this problem and think about boating safety classes and safety checks required for permitting boats on the lake. Let’s get this information together and be ready to discuss our approach in the next meeting.

Action: Put on the Agenda for Old business for the next meeting.

 

Open Floor

Mark McCormick 483: This is a letter I wrote about 2 weeks ago when I saw a Madison County officer haul off a gall off Tamarack Beach ; it’s a really bad place right now. On Saturday there was a problem, I called Security and they called Madison County .  Madison Co. had dealt with them before; they were non residents and didn’t live in our neighborhood.  This happens all year and is especially worse on the forth of July.  They bring alcohol, change clothes and smoke pot. There is yelling, screaming and underage drinking.  The parking lot is always over flowing. There are drug deals where two cars pull into the parking lot, one person gets out and goes into the other car, sits for a minute, gets out and they both leave. It happens all the time. Most of the neighborhood residents won’t go there because of the Trash and bottles, broken glass.  They just don’t feel safe going there.

We need to get rid of the picnic tables because that’s they first place they go. If they start hanging on the playground equipment then get rid of that too.  Don’t let them get comfortable. Trim the tree limbs.  Have frequent security checks, where they actually get out of their car and ask for identification.  If it’s a rowdy crowd and there is a resident there ask for guest passes. Arrest the trespassers.  I’m tired of picking up trash, beer cans and baggies. We can make this a nice beach like the main beach or just shut it down and sell it.
Roger: You didn’t send this letter to us did you?
Mark: No I didn’t, I just sat and wrote this the other day.  The beach is bad, really bad.

Scott: With the ski club up there I have noticed that you brought up was low hanging branches, we should really clean that up.
Mark: They really cleaned the beach on Monday morning anyway. There was a wild party there on Sunday and they really had to clean that.  
Roger: This problem is not a surprise to us; it’s been that way since I have been here. Glenn would there be any benefit to us being a lot more proactive by closing this beach at sundown? 

Glenn: Yes

Mark: These people are trashing it at night, and during the day Trash just hangs out there.
Conversation Ensues

Roger: Glenn you and Rob evaluate the situation there and come back to us with a plan.  If it becomes board action we will take care of it.   Find out what Madison County Sheriff can do for us and we will entertain it.  Another thing you said that has been bothering us is that we don’t have membership cards to even help the security guys.  Perhaps we should look at, and maybe get them with Photos on the card for the minors even. We used to have Ids on cars

Action: Glenn to bring back all the information to next meeting.

 

Scott Motions to adjourn to executive session, Ray Seconds

Meeting Adjourns at 9:30 p.m.

 

Reconvene from Executive Session to Regular Session 10:20 PM

Don moves Dave Seconds

 

Adjourn from Regular Session 10:25 PM

Don moves Paul seconds

 

 

Minutes submitted by Don Austin Secretary and Kellie Bechtold

            Back To Top


 

Date: August 27, 2008

 

Attendance

Board Members

            Present:  Ray Garber , Don Austin, Scott Webber, David Decker and Paul Mormino

            Excused Absences:   Derrick Richardson, Roger Groth

            Quorum Present: Yes

 

Others Present

            Holishor Members Present 5

            Glenn Dalton and Angie Basham from Holishor Office

 

Proceedings

Meeting called to order at 7:30 PM

Pledge of Allegiance Recited

 

Minutes of August 13, 2008

Action:  Ray motions to approve, Dave seconds

Discussion ensues for some amendments

Motion carries to approve Amended minutes

 

Transfers of Property

Action: Dave moves to accept as submitted, Paul Seconds

Motion Carries

 

Correspondence - None

 

Old Business

            DCEO Grant Update

Scott:  Contractor bids have not been received and we are still waiting on IDNR to respond.  Glenn calls about twice per week, and as soon as IDNR approves, the check will be cut. 

 

            Fireman Ballroom Rental

Scott:   They are asking us to waive all fees.

Don:   This was deferred for the last meeting because of a couple of unclear issues and Glenn was to check into and report back to us.  It is my understanding that during the time Holiday Shores club house was not available because of the fire they allow us to use the Firehouse for our meetings for no charge.

Glenn:   The security officer that will be required for the event, Holishor Officer has volunteered to work event at no charge.

Paul:  What about the cleaning fee.

Glenn:  That is the only thing that is still pending.

Dave:  I personally would be willing to have Holishor Association pay that fee to show support to the Fire Department. It is an all volunteer association and they do a lot for the community.

Scott:  What about the damage deposit?

Dave:  We should require the damage deposit just incase some thing happens, because it is fully refundable.

Paul:  I also would like the damage deposit upfront, but totally refundable.

Dave:    I move to waive the rental fees and the cleaning fees and allow the Holiday Shores Fire Department to host the Madison County Firemen Association meeting on October 16, 2008 , and require damage deposit which is totally refundable.   Paul Seconds

Motion: Motion carries

 

            Fishing Rules

Scott:  The Board has the new version of the fishing rules.  Based on the last meeting we had asked Glenn to get the daily limits and size limits from the State of Illinois to reference in our rule. You have large mouth, small mouth & hybrid Bass, Catfish and Crappie.  The Crappie is the same as our existing rule, and all the other fish is basically none.

Dave:  Is our large mouth bass the same as the State?  

Glenn: No!  It all depends on the body of water.  

Dave:  Is that what our previous rule was?

Glenn:  Yes!  IDNR lets us work in conjunction with them to mandate what our size and limits.

Scott:    The only rule I changed was Crappie, there was actually no size or creel limit, because the board put a temporary suspension to the rule on the Main Lake .  I did put in the rule of 20 creel limit 8 inches long.   

Don:  Why did we suspend the limits?

Glenn:  There was an over population.

Don:  Is it still that way

Scott:  The recommendation from the fishing committee this year was to continue with the no limit on the crappie.

Ray I make a motion to accept the new rules and then we make another motion to continue the temporary suspension on Crappie. If we are going to set this as a rule we need to include the Fine limits.

NO SECOND.

Dave:  Has the Fines structure been link to this yet? I Struggle with approving when the fine structure has not linked. 

Glenn:   I will add the fine structure to the rule.

Don:  Let’s postpone this till the Fines structure is in place.

Conversation Ensues.

ACTION:  Fishing rules deferred until next meeting and Glenn is to prepare a link for the fines to the fishing and no hunting rules.

 

            Cheryl Layton Drainage problem

Cheryl: I submitted a letter back in July regarding flooding July 3rd which was the second time that home had flooded because of water backing up from the drainage culvert.   I understand that we have had a lot of rainfall this year. I Spent $700 on new carpet, and I spent $800 on new drainage pipe trying to keep water from coming into my house.  Biggest concern is that if we have this kind of rainfall again, and the water doesn’t drain properly, am I going to be out another $700 dollars in carpet. I contacted the Madison County Storm Water Directors Office in Edwardsville and was told that the culverts out there are not up to code where they should be.  I am concerned about the future, what I am supposed to do?

Scott:  As we all know we have had a record rainfall, in the 150 history, was measured 47 inches.  We have come up with a road plan and this one is on the list.

Cheryl:  What about drain pipes from neighbors down spouts off of house draining into my yard?

Scott:  I believe there is Madison County Law that says you may not redirect water onto a neighbor’s property

Dave:  What is it specifically you are asking the board to do?

Cheryl:  I originally wanted to be reimbursed for the carpeting, but I don’t mind eating that expense.  I want to know what can be done in the future by Holiday Shore to keep the water from coming back on me?

Scott:  As I stated before that culvert or pipe is on the road plan to be replaced and enlarged.

Conversation ensues

 Jim Perotti to check on neighbors culverts and downspout drainage and advise.

Action:  None taken at this time.

           

 

New Business

           

Variance Request – 1050 Bermuda – Fence

Scott:  Looks like you had a fence installed, on a lake front property.  Building rules state that it needs to be 50% open.

Jerry Theodore (building committee) She has a 5 ½ inch board with only a 2 ½ inch space in between.

Diane Lee (1050) I gave the contractors all the rules, and I had highlighted the rules and they installed fence incorrectly. They said they did work out here all the time and they knew what to do.   I was not living in the house yet because I was remodeling and the fence was built during the time of construction and when I returned to the house the fence had been installed incorrectly.  I have been in contact with the contractor company and they said at this time they could do nothing for me.  I got estimates and it will cost me approximately $1200 to correct.

Paul:  At the last building committee meeting, I asked if you were able to find a signed contract.

Diane Lee (1050) A signed contract was never located and I am not sure that one was ever signed. 

Dave:  I have to say that the building committee did not recommend the variance and generally we try to go along with what the building committee recommends because this is what they deal with on a regular basis.  I will say this is raw deal for you, it really is, but if it is a matter of someone coming in after they build something wrong I have a hard time waiving that.

Conversation ensues.

Dave:  What we will do is Glen will write you a letter explaining the rule violation for the fence construction that you can take to your contractor.   

Action:  Variance not approved

 

            Asphalt Patch Bids

Scott:  I now have in my hands two sealed bids for asphalt patch I am going to open. 

Don reads bids:

The First bid is from Maxx Paving & Sealing.  Part 1 is $38,720 and Part 2 is $23,400. 

The Second bid is from Ricky Brothers.  Part 1 is $31,830 and Part 2 is $19,475.

Glenn:  The reason for Part 1 & 2 is that we asked for two different amounts, Part one is for doing the asphalt work and part two is for saw cutting, digging out those patches, and putting base back in.  We thought we may be able to do the part 2 ourselves, so we wanted to see what the breakout costs would be to do the 42 patches.  I feel that we need to do an Asphalt patch rather than chip and sealing these patches.

Conversation ensues. 

Ray:  We have $28,000 in the budget.  Culvert project $13,000.  I have been doing research on the budget, we may have an excess in income of $15,000 and $9000 less in expenses.  I prefer to leave a cushion rather than spend.

Paul:  Are we are going to focus on the worst road patches first without cutting into all our funds at this time. .

Glen:  That is our plan.

More conversant ensues

Action:   Dave makes a motion that we go with asphalt instead of chip and seal, Paul Seconds

Motion carried.

Action:  Don makes a motion that we allow Glenn and Jim to negotiate with Ricky Brothers as our preferred contractor to do the required asphalt and to see how far we can go with our budget by doing part of the work ourselves.  Dave seconds.

Motion carries

More conversation ensues about road repair connected with culvert repair.

Dave: one item we have discussed and said we were going to do, but never put a date on is when we are going to repair the culverts. Do you want to do the culverts this year?

Don:  By culverts are you talking about the drains to control rain water?

Dave; I am talking about the three we discussed in the last meeting, Tampico , San Juan and Nassau . 

Don: I feel they need to be done this year.

Action:  Paul makes a motion that we replace the culverts on Tampico , San Juan and Nassau this year.  Don seconds.

Motion carries   Dave abstains from voting because of conflicting interests.

 

            Ballroom Air conditioning repairs

Scott:  I have a request for approval of expenditure of $4500 for air conditioning compressor repairs. 

Paul:  Have we gotten any further bids on this or go with the vendor we normally use

Glenn:  The problem with getting further bids is the time frame.  We have it book this weekend for 100 person plus party, which we should be able to get by on 2 stages.  But next weekend we have 200 plus person party and we can’t have Jim out there with a box of fuses and hose on the coils. 

Paul:  We have been using this vender for several years and I would like to see other bids.

Jim Perotti:   He has been the only who was able to find the problem.

Don:   was the diagnosis a compressor problem.

Jim Perotti:  Yes, in stage three one of the compressors is burned up. To make the repair he has to replace both compressors and the contactor.

Paul:  I am not arguing with the diagnosis I feel the price of $4,500 is too high.  How much does that leave in the Ball Room air-conditioning fund?

Dave:   Was your plan was to pull the money out of the reserves

Glenn.  Yes, we have $7,200 in the Ball room reserve fund plus this year’s amount of $800 which makes it about $8,000.00.

Scott:  We have a ninety day rule about spending pending reserve funds.

Ray; This is a classic example of why that is not a good rule

Action:  Dave makes a motion to approve the expenditure of $4,700.00 to repair the air conditioner.

Ray: Seconds

Dave:  In addition to that, but not change that motion, we need to discuss what budget that money comes out of.

Ray:   We can pay out of operation budget and 90 days from now we take the money out of the reserves to replace the money out of operation budget and today is the first day toward the ninety days.   At some later date we need to discuss the modification of that 90 day rule.

Motion carries

Scott.  Also tonight we need to approve taking the money out of the reserve account and refund the money to the operating budget and it needs to be posted in the Holiday Times so we can vote on it in the November meeting.

Ray: I make the motion to spend the money out of the Reserve to repair the ball room compressor.   Don:  seconds.

Motion carries   

 

            Write-Off – 1208 Key Largo – Foreclosure

Scott:  This is from the last meeting, it is a short sale, and we need to vote on writing off $2390.50

Angie (Holishor Office) - We were never notified of the foreclosure.  It was not served or summoned. It went straight from owners to judicial deed, then short sale to new owners.  New member has paid her initiation fee and dues & assessments and is a member in good standing. 

Action:  Dave makes a motion to approve write off as submitted.  Don seconds

Motion carries

 

Noise Abatement

Glenn:  We are trying to come up with a system where it is not a subjective call by our officers as to what is too high of a noise level.  The only city that we could find was the City of Chicago that has a noise abatement procedure the same as we want to use to measure ours.

Chicago ’s, measures from the property line in residential areas, is 60 db.  Ours currently for the lake is 76.  We think that 76 is pretty reasonable and we have a demo set up tonight to show you.  If you will step out on the deck, we will demonstrate. The device we will use to measure the music being played is a decibel meter.  What we will in the event of a complaint is walk to the edge of the property line and with both in concurrence we will measure the db level using the meter.

Dave.  If the person who is complaining is three blocks away what property line do you use?

Glenn:  We will take the initial measurement on the complainer’s property and then go down to the offender’s property and take an additional measurement.

Scott: what happens when someone calls in and they don’t like the type of music their neighbor is playing?  Do you go down there and it measures 60.  Is it over with?  

Glenn:  First we have to determine if there is a problem.  If we go three blocks away there might not be a problem, but when we go to the property line there he could be.

Demo given out on the beach with music – meeting goes outside

Conversation ensues:

Scott:  What is it that you are proposing?

Glenn:  My proposal is let us test 76 decibels for the lake and also land based noise level complaints and let us see if 76 is an acceptable level as a trial to see if this works.

Paul:   What does Madison County say?

Glenn:  Madison County is subjective; the officer either says that’s too loud or its no problem.

Conversation ensues

Action:  no action necessary.

Motion, none

 

 

            Golf Tournament

Paul:  Just for the record September 20th.  Economy down, but would like to see some more sponsors out here.  The proceeds may go to upgrade the marquis throughout the community and possibly paying toward the utilities as well.

 

 

Continuing issues that require finalization

Ray:  Have we resolved the Marina noise issue

Glenn:  We still need to discuss that in the next meeting

 

Don:  From last meeting, Tamarack beach issue. 

Glenn:  We have investigated, and will talk in the next session

 

 

Open Floor - none

 

Paul Motions to adjourn to executive session, Don Seconds

Meeting Adjourns at 9:30 p.m.

 

Reconvene from Executive Session to Regular Session 10:20 PM

Don moves Dave Seconds

 

Adjourn from Regular Session 10:25 PM

Don moves Paul seconds

 

 

Minutes submitted by Don Austin Secretary and Angie Basham.

Back To Top


Date: September 10, 2008

 

 

Attendance

Board Members

            Present:

Roger Groth, Derrick Richardson, Don Austin, Scott Webber, David Decker

and Paul Mormino

            Excused: Ray Garber

            Quorum Present: Yes

 

Others Present

            15 Holishor Members Present

            Glenn Dalton and Kellie Bechtold from Holishor Office

 

 

Proceedings

Meeting called to order at 7:30 PM

Pledge of Allegiance Recited

 

Minutes of August 27, 2008

Action: Scott Motions to approve, Derrick Seconds

Motion carries

 

Bills & Salaries

Action: Derrick Motions to approve, Paul Seconds

Motion carries

 

Transfers of Property

Action: David motions to approve, Derrick seconds

Motion Carries

 

Managers Report

Given by Glenn Dalton

 

Treasury Report

Given by David Decker

Action: Scott motions to approve, Paul Seconds

Motion Carries

 

Correspondence

·         Gregory Horta:  Social Committee Bingo Fundraiser: Email to Board

·         Linda Beasley:  Ballroom Rental Fee Waiver: Edwardsville Wrestling Club (EWC)

·         Susan Vogel:  Ballroom Rental: Dissatisfied, wants money back.

·         David Berkenbile:  Drainage issues

All Read by Don Austin

Action: Discuss in New Business

 

 

 

 

 

Old Business

            Fishing Rules
Proposed Rule:
Fishing and Hunting

Read by Don Austin

Property owners are governed by the State Conservation Laws on fishing.  Fish may be taken from Holiday Lake , the North Pond and SuTwan Lake by attended hook and line only.  Fishing on Holiday Lake, the North Pond and SuTwan Lake shall exclude trot lines, jugging, bow and arrow, cross bow, seining, pitch fork, spear, spear gun, gigs, firearms or unattended lines unless conducted by the Association.

 

No fishing is ever allowed in designated swimming areas.

 

Hunting is prohibited within the boundaries of Holiday Shores .   No discharge of firearms is allowed in Holiday Shores .

 

The Illinois Department of Natural Resources may make recommendations and changes to creel limits which will be posted.  The Association may amend limits in order to protect or manage any fish species. 

 

Species                                      Daily Limit                        Size Limits                  

Largemouth Bass                                 3                              14” minimum lengths

Smallmouth Bass                                 1                              18" minimum length

Hybrid Striped Bass                            3                              14" minimum length

Catfish (All Species)                           3                              14" minimum length

Crappie (All Species)                       20                                8” minimum length

 

There shall temporarily be no limit on crappie taken from the main lake until the fishing committee recommends to the Board of Directors differently.   There shall be a limit of 20, 8" in length taken from SuTwan Lake . ( July 12, 2006 )

No fishing is permitted from the shores of private property or docks of private property except with owner’s permission.

Action: Scott motions to approve the amended fishing rules, Derrick seconds

Motions Carries

 

North Pond Rule Change

Only fishing from the bank is allowed. Boating or swimming is not allowed.

Action: Scott motions to add the following to the existing boating rules, Don seconds.

Hold till next meeting for second reading.

 

For record purposes

Expenditure of money from the reserve account for ballroom air conditioner repair in the amount of $4700.00.

New Business

Linda Beasley: Ballroom Rental Fee Waiver: Edwardsville Wrestling Club (EWC)

Linda Beasley 1849
Roger:
Has your club used this facility previously?
Linda:
No
Roger:
Why are you coming here and why are you asking it be free of charge?
Linda:
Most of our members are residents of
Holiday Shores , it’s centrally located and I wanted to share our ballroom with others. There will be about 125-150 people.
Paul:
It does say that it is a non for profit organization and that is why we have approved it in the past.
Roger:
We will want a refundable damage deposit, cleaning and security fee, and the sponsor will have to sign the agreement, can we agree on that.

Conversation Ensues

Mark Mestemacher (Head Coach EWC): Our club is made up of kids from 4-14 years old. We have middle school and High school members who belong to our club.  We have about 200 members of the club that participate every year. We have used the Edwardsville Gun club, American Legion, and Moose lodge. We have also been at St Cecelia church in Glen Carbon. We rotate every year. Even though we are not part of the Edwardsville School district we are aligned very closely with the Edwardsville school district
Roger: Did the American Legion charge a fee?
Mark: Yes they charged $100.

Action: Paul motions to approve the waiver of the rental fee with the exception of the security fee, damage deposit and cleaning fee and the sponsor signs the agreement.    Scott seconds.

Motion Carries

 

Gregory Horta 1253: Social Committee Bingo Fundraiser: Email to Board

Roger: What’s the difference in the Bingo fundraiser and our Casino Night? Glenn did not see a difference in the two. I don’t want the board to be put into a position to approve or disapprove what the Social Committee is doing as far as their events go, but when it comes to fund raisers that is a different story.  I want to make sure that it is legal and no permits or fees are required. I suggest we let Glenn work with this and make sure that there is no permit requirement like if you were gambling. I would suggest we give tentative approval until we get this information.

Conversation Ensues

Action: David motions to approve the fundraising endeavor of Bingo Night as long as its legal, Scott Seconds.

Motion Carries

 

Susan Vogel: Ballroom Rental: Dissatisfied, wants money back

Action: Glenn is to handle & to get back to the board. Since the person who rented is not the member and the contract is with the member we wish to hear from the member instead of the sponsored guest, and the amount of $520 needs to be verified.

 

Golf Tournament

Paul: The economy is down and in 2006 we had a lot of sponsors and prizes.  This year the belts are tighter and we are not getting the sponsors we had in 2006 and 2007. I have gone out and knocked on doors and begged for sponsors but don’t expect a lot of income from this year’s tournament.

David: How are we doing on teams?
Paul: Teams are doing ok its mostly just the sponsors, like Anheuser Busch, they did not sponsor this year. One year we had an autographed football from Kurt Warner, this year the pocket books are just tight. You’ll see that in the Walk run as well.

Open Floor

Action:  No open floor

 

Scott Motions to adjourn Paul Seconds.

Meeting Adjourns at 8:15 pm

 

Minutes Submitted by Don Austin, Secretary and Kellie Bechtold.

Back To Top


Date: September 24, 2008

 

Attendance

Board Members

            Present: Roger Groth, Derrick Richardson, Ray Garber, Don Austin,

            Scott Webber, David Decker and Paul Mormino

            Quorum Present: Yes

 

Others Present

            10 Holishor Members Present

            Glenn Dalton and Kellie Bechtold from Holishor Office

 

Proceedings

Meeting called to order at 7:30 PM by President Roger Groth

Pledge of Allegiance Recited

 

Minutes of September 10, 2008

Action: Paul motions to approve Scott seconds

Scott: Page Two, North Pond Rule Change, it should be North Pond Rule.

Motion carries:  as amended

 

Minutes of Special Meeting DCEO Grant 5/20/08

Action: Ray motions to approve, David Seconds

Scott: Change Jerry Truedeau to Jerry Theodor

Dave:  We need to add a note to the Engineering fees that we are going to use the $12,500 to    clean silt ponds behind gabion baskets

Motion carries to accept amended minutes

 

Minutes of Special Meeting DCEO Grant 6/27/08

Action: Scott motions to approve amended minutes, Derrick seconds

Paul:  At the top it says Special Board of Directors meeting at Roger Groth’s home.  Then it says voting members.  I was not at Roger Groth’s home. I would like to strike Roger Groth’s home from the record, because it would lead you to believe we were all at Roger’s house and we were not.

Dave   I was not there either

Don: Actually you all did vote by phone and the meeting was at Roger’s house but I will take that out.

Motion carries as amended.

 

Minutes of Special Meeting 319 Grant 7/23/08

Action: Paul motions to approve, Ray seconds

Motion carries

 

Minutes of Special Meeting 319 Grant 7/28/08

Action: Derrick motions to approve, Scott seconds

Dave:  On page 4 of the votes remove my name Paul from the Nay and put Scotts name in there.

Motion carries as amended

 

 

Correspondence

Sue Moore 333 Overlook: Ballroom Rental Fee Refund for 8/23/08 for her nephews wife Suzan Vogel.

Roger:  If you will remember in the last meeting we asked Glenn to contact the sponsoring member to see if they wanted to pursue the refund and he did that.  I would entertain a motion that we refund the ballroom fees that is consistent with our policies.

Action: Derrick Motions to approve refund minus the security fee and the cleaning fee, David seconds

Paul  I would like to go the record that since we have had an issue like this before that in the interest of not playing favorites we may have to pay some another people who have had this same problem.

Dave   Just for clarity, we are only talking about the ballroom rental fee and not all the cleaning and security fees.

Motion Carries

 

Brian Sciranko 356 Wanda: Culvert Variance request

Read by Don Austin

Action: Deal with in new business

 

Old Business

DCEO Contractor Bids

Roger: Glenn is going to meet with the engineering firm for the bid specifications for the Morning Glory repair.  Glenn, would you update us on the grant money.
Glenn: The IDNR person assured me last week that he would get the contract to the DCEO office this week, however they are in the process of moving their offices So, I called IDNR again and he had submitted the DCEO Grant this morning, so we should be hearing something soon.

Roger: So,,, as far as we are concerned, just for the record, we think we have the other consulting agencies cleared and It’s just a matter of DCEO actually issuing us the check  for the money and in the mean time we are proceeding to get contractor bids to for fixing the Morning Glory.

Glenn: Yes

 

Bingo Requirements for fundraiser

Roger: If you will remember we approved the fund raiser last meeting pending on research as to whether it is legal of not.  We asked Glenn to do some research to see if it was legal for us to hold a fund raiser like this.  We have found there is a multi-page law on Bingo in Illinois and we are not the type of charitable organization that qualifies to engage in this activity whether it is cash prizes or not. 

 

Fishing Rule Fines

Roger:  We have had many discussions in the last few months about updating our rules to include the North pond which lead to rules about creel limits and so we asked Glen to provide us with some fishing violation fines.

Scott Reads proposed new rule

“The Creel limits established for our lakes are done in conjunction with IDNR and are developed to sustain our fishery as one of the best in the Midwest . We do want our membership to enjoy and use the resources as table fare; however, we also feel the fishery can be adversely impacted in short order if the creel limits are not followed and enforced. Fines for all fishing violations follow: $100.00 plus $5.00 per fish in possession for the first offense; doubled for additional violations within a 36 month period. No warnings will be issued.”

Roger: We are proposing this as a rule addition to be linked to the fishing rules we have worked on in the last two meetings.  Do we need to enter this in the form a motion so it can run its time frame?

Dave:  Yes, if you are going to make it a rule.

Scott: Yes it needs a motion and a second.

Action: Don motions to approve new rule, Ray seconds.

Scott: How does this measure up with the IL state law fines?
Glenn: Pretty close to the actual IL State laws.

Scott:  How will we enforce this?

Ray:   There are some other things besides fishing such as spears and gigs etc.  How will they be fined?

Conversation Ensues

Roger: Lets do this.  Glenn bring IDNRs infractions list to the next meeting and also I believe since we have had this amount of discussion and it has been going on for such a long time that we need to have all the rules and regulations including boating safety compliance put into our board packets for discussion in the next couple of meetings.  What I would like to see for next meeting is a presentation on current and proposed rules and how it fits in to the framework of the rules structure and how we enforce them.

Action:  Motion was not voted on and conversation was tabled until next meeting.

 

Proposed North Pond Rule
Only fishing from the bank is allowed. Boating or swimming is not allowed”.
Action:  This rule needed to be read again and is to be voted on next meeting

 

Update on the Golf Tournament

Paul:, I believe everyone had a good time, Angie is still getting the final tallies and I am happy to pass the torch on to Scott Webber . The winning team had 3 guys that shot 20 under and they won their entry fee back.  The weather was perfect and it was a beautiful day.  I had a lot of people donate door prizes and there were still some left over which I donated to a guy whose son has a brain tumor to auction off for money.

 

New Business

Brian Sciranko 356 Wanda: Culvert Variance request

Action: Paul motions to approve, Scott seconds

Paul: We are hoping that Jim Perotti and Brian will work with the staff to make sure the water will flow properly and that it doesn’t come out too far so that when we come through with the snow plows won’t hit it.

Motion Carries

 

Ray: I have one piece of new business

I sent a Email regarding a new purchase agreement that’s maturing on the 23rd of September and we have 10 days to figure out what to do with that.
David: I talked to them today they are figuring it now.

 

Open Floor

1302 Lisa Purdy: Is Caribbean Drive a private road or a county or township road?
Paul: Its private
Lisa: Is Public Safety allowed to be giving tickets?
Roger: No
Lisa: Can
Madison County?
Roger: Yes
Lisa: I heard a rumor that we had asked
Madison County to stay away from the area.
Roger: That’s far from the truth.
Lisa: When a wreck happened at about
2-3am about 10 Madison County Cops showed up and no Public Safety, why is that?
Roger: They are not on duty 24 hours a day.
Lisa: I just want to tell you that people are still speeding through there and I have called
Madison County and I told them that they can sit in my driveway and catch speeders because someone is going to get hit.  Is it ok if I do that?
Roger: Yes. It is very much OK for you and other members to place whatever calls you believe are prudent to Law Enforcement Authorities. You are doing what you feel is right and we encourage that.

Lisa: there is a trench now in front of my house, but I don’t mind, it keeps people from speeding.

Glenn : We are Asphalt Patching Caribbean, Biscay, Waikiki , Su Twan and Fountain Belu, and we should be done by Friday.

 

Paul Motions to adjourn, Scott Seconds

Meeting Adjourns at 8:20pm

Back To Top


Date: October 8, 2008

 

Attendance

Board Members

            Present: Derrick Richardson, Ray Garber, Don Austin,

            Scott Webber, David Decker and Paul Mormino

            Excused: Roger Groth

            Quorum Present: Yes

 

Others Present

            Five Holishor Members Present

            Glenn Dalton and Kellie Bechtold from Holishor Office

 

Proceedings

Meeting called to order at 7:40 PM by Scott Webber

Pledge of Allegiance Recited

 

Minutes of September 24, 2008

Action: Paul motions to approve, Ray seconds

Paul: On Page 3, Golf tournament it was the guys Nephew that had the brain tumor not his son.

          On Page 4 the asphalt patching should be Fountain Bleu.

Dave: On Page 1 under the title Minutes of Special Meeting 319 Grant 7/28/08 , change the nay votes to Dave & Scott in the yes vote remove Dave.

Motion carries

 

Bills & Salaries

Action: Derrick motions to approve, David seconds

Motion carries

 

Transfers of Property

Action: Paul motions to approve, Derrick seconds

Motion Carries

 

Managers Report

Given by Glenn Dalton

 

Treasury Report

Given by David Decker
David: Just one note of interest, we had one repurchase agreement that expired last month and we rolled it into a new repurchase agreement

Action: Ray motions to approve, Derrick seconds

Motion Carries

 

Correspondence

Twin Rivers Karate Continuance Request

Read by Don Austin

Action: Discuss in New Business

 

 

 

Old Business

            North Pond Rule Third and Final Reading

“Only fishing from the bank is allowed. Boating or swimming is not allowed”.

Action: Derrick motions to approve, David seconds

Motion Carries

 

            IDNR Rules and Fines

The Board had been provided the with the rules that are established for the creel limit from IDNR

Scott: Is there a current fine for fishing?
Glenn: No there is not

Ray:  Is our rule charging more than the state of Illinois .

Glenn: Not really.  If the IDNR officer feels it is a minor offence he can charge you $75.00 for the offence and $4.00 for each illegal fish. If he feels is a larger offence he can charge you $75.00 per fish and confiscate all your equipment, boat and vehicle.  If you do not go to court he can sell it all at public auction. 

Ray: What is our fine structure and how would we treat repeat offenders?

Don: The proposed new rule was read into the minutes in the last meeting and because this conversation has been going on for so long Roger asked Glenn to put the IDNR rules including boating into our board packets for the next meeting to see how we measure up to the IDNR rules and fines.  The question then was “Do we have to make it a rule” and the answer was “yes”.

Conversation Ensues

Scott: This is the first time we have seen the IDNR rules perhaps we need to table until the next meeting to give us time to further research.

Scott:  One additional thing to consider is that the Holiday shore Security does not have the authority to board your boat.

Ray:  Is that right Glenn?

Glenn:  Yes that is correct

Don:  Glenn said last meeting they do not have to board your boat.  All they have to do is ask to see the safety devices and if refused then we issue a fine and they are off the lake.

Paul:  What is the reason we want to put all these rules into place?  Are we seeing lots of violations and we need our own rules?  I do not see why we don’t use the IDNR rules.

Scott:  The intent is, we are a self sufficient lake that uses association funds to stock the lake and we need the rules to protect our fishery

Dave: The idea is, if we have our own rules, we then have the ability to enforce our own fines, but the question becomes how we propose to enforce them.

Conversation Ensues

Tabled Until Further Notice

Action: Glenn is to draft a rule to be reviewed by the board to provide the Public Safety the authority to enforce creel limits and boating safety. To be written and presented at the Annual Meeting in May.

 

New Business

            Morning Glory Repair
Scott:
We had a meeting with Hennigan and Associates. Glenn would you give us a brief description on where we are with the DCEO Grant.
Glenn: We received the Grant Back in June. Then we had to go through the Preservation Society and IDNR to insure we were not endangering the habitat of endangered species. The Preservation Society approved the Grant in July. IDNR has been slow in responding because they were moving from one building to another building and we had to call them on a daily basis.  We just got approval 2 Fridays ago.  They faxed it to us and DCEO submitted it to the comptroller for payment. They may pay us in 30-60 days. The terms of the Grant agreement say that we need to spend the money by the 31st of December so the project has to be accomplished by Oct or Nov of this year. The money is there and the comptroller is required to pay it, so the check is in the mail.

Scott: In meeting with the engineering firm we decided that there is a pretty aggressive time table.  They wanted to start at the end of this month. Monday morning we will have the pre-bid meeting at 10:30 AM on the Dam. Because we do not know when the funding will be here, there will be 2 bids, one on December 1st and the other in April. The recommendation is to draw the lake down 2 feet or we can put a collar on the Morning Glory.  We are putting a temporary collar on the Morning Glory for about 3 weeks and it will not effect boating.

Conversation Ensues

Gerry Theodor e 1347: I think if we keep the collar permanent it will prolong the life expectancy of the Morning Glory because not so much water would be going through it.

Scott: The whole reason to draw down the lake or put a collar on it is so that no water will go through it while they are repairing it.

Conversation Ensues

 

Scott: The next item on the agenda is the engineering fees work order we need to approve for services already completed. The engineering fees are not to exceed $4500.00 for the 319 grant and are covered under DCEO.

Action: Derrick motions to sign the work order, Ray seconds

Motion Carries

 

Scott: The next item is the $20,500 part of the DCEO preliminary design work order, we are agreeing to this price whether we get the DCEO or not. If we get the grant then its included, if not then we pay it anyway. It is for services already performed.

Action: David motions to accept the work order, Ray seconds

David: Shouldn’t we be getting these work orders before they do the work and approving before they do the work?
Glenn: By getting these so late in the process it made me very upset with the engineer, we have been pushing them to get this too us and we just go them. I am not happy with them.

Paul: Is there a sense of urgency to sign this?  What if we do not sign this happens?

Scott: They are out of $20,500.00 they did the work on good faith.

Conversation Ensues

Consensus: This document is not clear and we need a better breakdown of exactly what this $20,500 gets us.  

The Vote - for 0, against 5, Ray Garber, Derrick Richardson, Don Austin, David Decker and Paul Mormino vote No.

Action:  Glenn to get a complete breakdown of what this $20,500 gets us. Also need the dates to match.

 

            Karate in the Ballroom
Scott:
 I have heard nothing but great things about this class from parents and kids.

Action: David motions to approve for another 3 months, Derrick seconds

Motion Carries

 

Open Floor

Jeannie Votruba 493: You said bids are going to be open this Monday and is it open to the public?
Glenn: we are going to meet with the contractors and take the grate off the morning glory to look and determine what their bidding on.

Jeannie: Can I watch it being done?
Glenn: Sure you are welcome to come.  It’s just going to be a bunch of guys looking in a pipe but you are welcome.

Jeannie: When this work is being done, I’m assuming that Holiday Dam road will not have to be closed?
Glenn: No it will not.  The work will be 18 feet under ground

 

Action: Paul Motions to go to executive session, Don Seconds

Motion Carries 8:40 PM

 

Action: Paul motions, Ray seconds to return to regular session at 9:15 PM

Motion carries

 

Action: Don motions and Ray seconds to adjourn at 9:15 PM

Motion carries

Back To Top


Date: October 22, 2008

 

Attendance

Board Members

            Present: Roger Groth, Derrick Richardson, Ray Garber, Don Austin,

            Scott Webber, David Decker.

            Absent: Paul Mormino

            Quorum Present: Yes

 

Others Present

            Holishor Members Present 8

            Glenn Dalton and Kellie Bechtold from Holishor Office

 

Proceedings

Meeting called to order at 7:30 PM

Pledge of Allegiance Recited

 

Minutes of October 8, 2008

Action: Scott Motions to approve the minutes, Derrick seconds

Motion carries

 

Transfers of Property

Action: Ray motions to approve, Derrick seconds

Motion Carries

 

Correspondence

Read by Don Austin

Don and Mary Baugh: Variance Request for log front House

Roger: They are rebuilding a burned home that had T11 4x11 siding. The building committee approved 3:1.

Gerry Theodore: The building committee views logs as more worthy than siding.

Ray: We have standards and we have to be careful of our acceptance, being that it was burned it is a special circumstance.

Derrick:  What’s the address?

Don Baugh 1813: 1813 Sextant and we appreciate all that came and helped us.

Don A.: I may be the only person that feels this way, but we established this rule requiring masonry fronts for new builds whether it be a rebuild or not. I don’t know why we make these rules if we constantly approve variances. So I am against it.
Ray: are there any neighbors that object?
Don Baugh: No

Art Surgant 1812: I am looking forward to seeing the new home and I am a neighbor.

Derrick: Doesn’t the building committee ask the neighbors as a routine?
Roger: No not really. Is there a reason you chose a log home rather than what we have in the rules?
Don Baugh: When we moved out here we always wanted a Log Front home and this may be our last opportunity to have one.

Conversation Ensues

Action: David motions to approve the variance, Ray Seconds

Roger: as a board we are reluctant to approve variances for no compelling reason, at this point we are saying these members had a home that met the standards of the time and it burned so it is a replacement home and not a new construction.

David: We rely on the building committee to make the best choice and I tend to lean with them for the best choice. I would have preferred you to come in with a stone front but based upon some of the things Roger just summarized I am for it.

For Ray Garber Derrick Richardson, Scott Webber, David Decker. Against Don Austin

Motion Carries

 

Old Business

Hennigan and Associates

Roger: I am going to quickly summarize for the board’s members what we need to discuss tonight. 

We have Ron Paul here tonight from Hennigan and Associates to talk about the bids for the morning Glory.  The bid opening was today and we want to give our board members time to discuss and clarify the bids we got today. The Purpose of this discussion is to allow us the opportunity to discuss issues and ask clarifying questions about the bids, the process and engineering fees with Ron and to get his recommendations.  We do not need to make any decisions tonight on bids or contracts. It’s for information and discussion.  We will make these decisions in the near future. I really don’t want us to talk about the amounts in these bids on the record.

Also in our meeting packets we have to discuss the new language on fishing rules carried over from last meeting.  We need to hear from on Glenn on the 2008 Loss Control report; we need to give an update on the DCEO Grant, also the leaf burning restrictions as well as the Marina Deed. We also need a Finance Committee report and there will be an executive session afterwards to discuss real estate.

 

Ron Paul of Hennigan and Associates introduces himself as Directing project manager on the Morning Glory repair

 

Scott:  We have a carry over from the last meeting which is a bill we got that needs a break out of actual costs of the $19,000 proposal.  It was tabled from last meeting so can we discuss that first to get it out of the way first?

Roger:  Why don’t’ you take the lead on this.  Just so you all will know I did not attend the last meeting and the board ask Glenn to get a break down of the costs which Glenn provided us in our meeting packet.

Scott: Out of our pre meeting there were two requests; one was for the engineering fees that were part of the DCEO grant.  The $20,500.00 you did in advance in good faith. One of the issues we had was that the date was wrong on the invoice it was supposed to be 30 days but it said that we only had 15.

Ron: Just to clear that up there is no invoice, we call it a Work Order, it’s a contract not a bill. It authorizes us to do the work and bill you at some point. We have done the work but we have not billed you for it.

Scott: That was work that you have already done?
Ron: Yes, but we have not billed you for it yet.
Scott: But if we sign the contract and don’t get the grant then we would still have to pay for those services, and if you can see there are two different dates on it, which I thought we had asked to have corrected.

Ron: The September 30 is the date I wrote that Work Order.  The September 12 is the date that Glenn and I talked about putting it together.

Ray: The $19,000 for observation services has not been done yet, correct?
Ron: Correct

Scott:  The $14,000.00 preliminary and final design engineering services has been performed.  The documents for bidding award assistance services are $6,500.00 which has been performed and totals $20,500.00.

Ron: Yes

Scott:  That was our contracting question.  They have already done that work and we have not signed the contract for them to do the work.  What was being requested was we were to sign the contract so that at some point in time they can bill us when we get the DCEO grant.

Ron:  Yes

Roger:  That same Work Order has $19,000.00 fixed fee for construction, admin and contract observation services all embedded in that contract.  I believe it was also in that amount that you had some push back on, Correct?

Ron:  Yes

Conversation Ensues

Ray: I am looking at the DCEO grant survey in which we itemized what we would be spending in the different categories to get to the $150.000.00. It was my understanding that those fees, including your engineering fees were estimates.  Usually estimates never come out the same as the actual costs.  Now when you add up the engineering cost I’m looking at your charging $14,000 for preliminary and final design. I know we did $12,000 work on that already. When you add up the engineering cost its going to cost more for all the preliminary stuff than the project will actually be. I’m just surprised.

Ron: On a day to day basis we deal with DCEO grants and you have to understand that sometimes these estimates are made three years in advance of the projects and we have to stick by these estimates.  On a scope of a project there are Items that have to be completed whether it’s a $1 or a $1,000,000 project. The bulk of those fees will stay the same regardless of the size of the project. Typically the areas we do not normally deal with a fixed price are a part of the $19,000.00. Construction observation is line item in our fees that are almost always time and material.  

 

Ray: That $41,000 does not include the $19,000; I’m looking at the DCEO grant guidelines and its 15-20% of total grant money for architectural engineering. In this case its 25-28% which is almost double. I’m looking at it and I thought it was going to be less and I’m struggling with it.

 

Conversation Ensues   (People are talking & shuffling paper and it’s hard to understand)

 

Ron: What I want you to understand is that traditionally $2,000 is wrapped into two services. There will be two maybe three requests. Those are construction administration work. Its all under that line of it costs the same no matter what the project is.

Scott:   Another thing Roger is we have two copies of the same Work Order in our packet and they are not the latest work order.

Roger: Ron we have a very significant difference of opinion on that line item and the $19,000. It was my opinion that this line item was where we recoup our overhead costs from that grant. It was my understanding from the day we started this; we knew we could recover our own costs and administer it. When I first saw this and I saw that you were claiming the $19,000, my thought was, where are our own overhead costs, accounting and legal fees, etc? They do not seem to be anywhere. There is something very remiss in the building of this Grant request and covering our needs. I know that you have had conversations with Glenn this afternoon and you are proposing that instead of the $19,000 as a fixed price we work it out on a time and materials basis. If you come in for 6 hours to review the work being done at $135.00/hour and Glenn approves it then we will have entered into a different work order with you for this engineering service.  I’m assuming that this is your solution to this disagreement we have with this.
Ron: I have no disagreement with this; I just want to make sure we are all clear.  I am afraid I don’t know all of the facts.
Roger: I know and I’m not confused because I was at all the meetings.

Ron: I wasn’t at all the meetings and the part of this that I had during the grant application assembly was to take the cost that we had and change it to a bid project and put it on paper. The $41,000 is not clear, it includes recoup from previous work and it also includes the design services and includes something else that I do not have in from of me right now. There is another $7,500 in other fees for something. It’s your other two work orders with us which is $1000 DCEO grant writing assistance. What I’m hearing is there was a definite misunderstanding. You believe the $19,000 was including your time, I made assumptions when I put that together, one was 15 days of someone like me working on this contract. That was about $12,000 then $7,000 in Admin and Safety fees. This is our spec book, unfortunately this is all the contract paperwork that is used and stipulates how it all goes through for you guys, this is the technical portion of it, all the construction Administration deals with contractor questions, shop drawings, field issues, pay requests, presenting information to your board, that’s the way we define construction administration.

Roger: We are going to have to resolve this line Item, because we are not in agreement that the $19,000 is going to Hennigan and Associates.

Ray:   The way I understand this is we have two possibilities and one is we get this grant, the other is that we don’t get the Grant.  In the later case because of prevailing wages and other regulations that would change that number to a lesser number.
Ron: probably not, if there was no grant involved these contractors are still paying their guys prevailing wages or better. I don’t really know, but regardless I feel you have done well.

Conversation Ensues

Ron: When you sign engineering contract there are two methods of payment.  One is a fixed fee were going to take a look at the project as a whole and build a little buffer and , no matter what happens we live by that number. Two, If it’s a Time and Material you take on the risk and it could be less it could be more, that’s the way we establish our price.
Roger: We have a continuing problem that’s gone on for a couple of years. If this were to have been a perfect project we would have had your work orders simultaneously while signing off on the Grant, we didn’t correct? We Requested a Grant and no contractual proposals from you to nail down those line items. We ended up as a board having to approve payments to your firm well after the services rendered and I thought that we had a conversation where we were going to stop that and get the prices up front so that we weren’t faced with this same thing. The problem is you have already done work and now your telling us how much you want for it. You haven’t given us a bill yet because you haven’t given us a contract yet.
Ron: I apologize for this but going back to the beginning when did the grant come about, this was not a grant project until recently was it?
Roger: It got approved recently but we started on it last February when we found out it was a real possibility. The problem was we already had estimates from your firm on the Morning Glory Repair so that we could budget and finance for it. The project has been going on for a long time.   Our problem is getting engineering services performed with no contract on them.
Ron: The initial project you had a contract on.
Roger: Not until after the fact.  We were getting services from you and we never got contracts to back it up. I thought we had enough conversations that this was not going to happen again and that we do not want to do it that way.  Now what I find out, all the conversations that we had about what is in these line items, is, we misunderstood. We as a board want to look at this work order proposal and engineering services and see if we want to go with a time and material basis. That’s where we are. Personally I am comfortable with the work order and everything in there except the $19,000 figure.

Conversation Ensues

Ron: I just want to let the board know that if we do it by time and material it may not be less than what we already proposed and I just want to make that clear.

Roger: I believe we are clear on this and we do understand the risks with that.

Conversation Ensues

 

Bid Proposals


Listen to Minutes

Roger: are you still firm with going with the crystalline coating system?
Ron: Yes
Conversation Ensues

Ron: I did this in your office downstairs this afternoon; Total Painting Solutions bids other works projects under Divers Construction Groups

 

Ray: Have you dealt with both of these companies?

Ron: I have dealt with one of them but not Divers construction Groups. What we did was we solicited bids and we got names from other people that do this type of work, everyone on this list had manufactures recommendations, I will call and check on references but I’m confidant that they will come back good. The last sentence on the recommendation letter, we recommend awarding the contract to diverse construction group based on funds. I have never called on a reference and got a bad review.

Roger: Are your sources provided by the bidder themselves?
Ron: Yes, we deal with this particular manufacturer 3-4 times a year and I am confidant that his recommendation is a good one, he knows what he’s doing.

Conversation Ensues
Roger:
we are really trying to wait on the DCEO funding to show up, I am going to call senator Haine tomorrow to see if there will be a payout date and so forth. At the boards last meeting they were reluctant to move forward with the project without the DCEO Funding. Ron, thank you very much. I believe that we have gone through a very professional process of going through these bids and hopefully the DCEO check is in the mail.  

 

 

Fishing rules

Roger:  What are these three separate rules?

Scott; This all started with the fishing rules and creel limits and there is no way currently to enforce fining people.  We asked Glenn to put something together to help enforce the rules.

Glenn: The first one is the key one; it gives us the enforcement capability in the common areas of Holiday Shores .   The second one gives us the capability to seek recovery for our legal fees from litigations and The third one is the rule itself.

 

Ray:  Are we trying to tie this not only to creel limits but to safety issues also.

Glenn:  This will help us to enforce our rules in the common areas of Holiday Shores  We are just trying to tie all the rules together so they all work in the common areas.

Roger:   With regard to #2, we have been discussing this issue for quite some time.  Are we in general agreement that we have a need for such a by-law change?

Scott:  It would be a bylaw addition.

Roger: Yes

Ray:   I believe it is needed.  There will be a day when we wish we had it.

Don:  I also believe it is needed.

Roger: Let’s look at #3

Ray:  Don’t we already have the rights to fine people

David:  The fact that we have a rule gives us the right to fine.  By definition if you have a rule to fine that is your authority to do so.

Roger:  The line of authority does not flow well.  If you are talking about rules for safe boating I feel you need a specific rule for everything you are going to fine people for. 

Let me ask, without getting into the technical issues where are we as a board with the idea of having our safety officers doing safety checks.  

I am concerned about unsafe boats and boaters and the IDNR has told us that we have unsafe boats and boating practices.   

Conversation Ensues

Action: Tabled #2 until January so Glenn can take it to the Attorney,

Don will work on rewriting #3 with Glenn’s help and Roger wants to talk with Glenn about #1.  

 

Finance Committee Meeting

David: One of the primary points with 2008 is based on a review of the current financial situation by Glenn, Angie and Ray.  There were estimates of possible shortages of $9,000 to $20,000 identified. These are conservative numbers. The best idea of how to handle this shortage is to move the estimated $15,000 for cleaning the silt pond into next year.  Two items up there for tonight is the AC repair.  We are scheduled after next meeting to move it to operational funds. Also we did a transmission overhaul that was about $1000 that needs to be decided tonight to take it from the reserve for the Massey replacement and refund the operational budget.  It’s in the emergency funds and does not have to be read 3 times and published.

Scott: Where did you get that rule?

Roger:  what we need to look at is Replacement and renovation rule on page 41. It is one of those things we need to look and revise the rule.

Conversation Ensues

Action: Scott is to bring the language for a new rule to the next meeting about emergency expenditures.

 

New Business
Lost control visit from our insurance company

Glenn: The Cincinnati Insurance people did an inspection.  Some of the faults they noted are:  The Fire extinguisher in the Kitchen was not mounted and it needs to be about 4-5 feet above the floor and Identified. We did that. The Restaurant exhaust be cleaned by a Professional to prevent the buildup of grease and it needs to be posted. The beacon is getting a formal contract and will have it done once each quarter. There is a storage area above the maintenance office that needed a guard rail and we did that. We have a bench grinder that is WWII Vintage and it did not have a safety shield so we fixed that.

We were happy they came in and we are always looking at OSHA standards. It was surprising for an inspector to only find this little. I was ecstatic.

 

DCEO Grant Extension Request

Roger: There is a draft in our packet; basically they are going to give us till September to do that, if we get the money the details will be different.  
David: We have money for the Morning Glory too and we want that extension to cover in that time frame too.

 

Leaf Burning Restrictions
Roger:
What I want to do with this is we have no rules relative to burning in the association and the best we can do is fall under the Madison County Ordinance.  From the Public Health perspective with asthma and respiratory problems should we consider leaf burning restrictions, I am going to table this for tonight.  I want you to think about it and tell me if it is or is not a possibility to do this.  As the Board President I get calls from a lot of people about this issue. .  Another part is if you look at the Madison County rule you can pretty much burn during the daylight hours.

 

Marina Contract
Roger: Read the copy as best you can and we will discuss this at the next meeting as well.

 

Paul Mormino Resignation

 

Read by Don Austin

 

Roger: We have 30 days to make a new appointment. One name I have is Jim McCann, I have talked to him and he would accept this appointment.
Scott: Dan Weisner and Larry Dallas expressed interest. I would like to thank Paul for the service he gave to the board.

 

 

Scott motions to adjourn to executive session Derrick Seconds

 

 

Minutes submitted by Don Austin Secretary and Kellie Bechtold

Back To Top


Date: November12, 2008

Attendance
Board Members
Present: Roger Groth, Scott Webber, David Decker, Don Austin, Ray Garber,
Excused: Derrick Richardson
Quorum Present: Yes

Others Present
Holishor Members Present 4
Glenn Dalton and Kellie Bechtold from Holishor Office

Proceedings
Meeting called to order at 7:30 PM
Pledge of Allegiance Recited

Roger:  We would like to appoint a new director in light of Paul Mormino’s resignation.
Action:  Don motions to elect Jim McCann, who is present tonight, to finish out Paul Mormino’s term, Ray Seconds.
Motion Carries
Many Welcomes and Thanks to Jim from the Board of Directors

Minutes of October 22, 2008
Action: Ray motions to approve, Scott seconds
Ray: On Page One, where it says Ray: What’s the Address?  That was Derrick not me.
Motion carries for amended minutes

Roger:  At this time I need to mention that there will be an executive committee meeting, downstairs, right after this meeting to discuss real-estate, legal and personnel.

Bills & Salaries
Action: Ray motions to approve, David seconds
Motion carries

Transfers of Property
Action: Scott motions to approve, David seconds
Motion Carries

Managers Report
Given by Glenn Dalton
Another bit of news is that Angie Basham has taken a position with another Company and her last day will be December 10, 2008.  We will miss her very much and we all wish her well.

Security report
None at this time due to a computer glitch

Treasury Report
Dave:  None at this time. I have one, but it is out in my car, I will bring it to executive session.

 

Roger:  We also need to have a finance committee meeting the first week in December in order to keep the budgets on track for the remainder of this year, The DCEO money, the 2009 budget and the proposed budget for 2010.   We need to have the 2010 budget ready for the Board in January so we can discuss and have it ready to present at the annual Board meeting.  Glenn, have you set a date for that meeting?
Glenn:  It is December the eighth.
Roger: Those members of the committee please let Glenn know about your availabilities.  Glenn, would you please call Joyce and inform her of the meeting.

Correspondence
Bob Behme 1842 Sextant: Neighbor Issues
Read by Don Austin
Action: It is a civil matter between neighbors.

Old Business
Air Conditioner Repair
Roger:   Scott you have something on the air condition repair
Scott:  Per our rules we need to make the final approval to transfer money Ball Room renovation fund to the operations account for the heating and air condition repair.
Action: Scott motions to approve the transfer of money not to exceed $4,700 from the ballroom heating and air account to the operation accounts for repair.  Ray Seconds
Motion Carries

Roger: While we are on subject of replacement renovations accounts we have this Rule Regarding the process that we follow to use money from the replacement renovation accounts that we need to discuss.
Scott reads proposed rule and Existing rule
EXISTING
Replacement and Renovation Account:       
Purpose:  The replacement and renovation account was established for the purpose of providing a reserve of funds for future purchases of capital equipment or major renovation expenditures. The replacement and renovation account shall be used for non- budgeted purchases of replacement equipment and for renovation when such purchases or renovations exceed the sum of $5.000.00.

Approval Process:   All proposed expenditures from the replacement and renovation account shall be approved by the Board.  After initial Board approval, notification of intent to expend funds from the account will be published in the next edition of The Holiday Times, together with the items(s) to be purchased and the reasons for their purchase. After publication of the proposed expenditures in the Holiday Times members shall have the opportunity to express their opinion on the expenditures at the next two regularly scheduled Board meetings.

 

Procurement:  At the end of the second Board meeting, following publication, and after due consideration of members’ comments, the Board shall make its final decision.
Ref:         Annual Meeting, May 89
                Board of Directors Meeting, 7- 13-89

PROPOSED:
Replacement and Renovation Account        
Scott:  The Proposed is the same as the Existing except for the following addition.
If the expenditure is less than $15,000: Board may elect to proceed with the purchase or expenditure if deemed an immediate need.  Notification of the expenditure(s) must be included in the meeting minutes and published in the Holiday Times.
Roger: What I want to do in this meeting is to discus what if anything we want to do with this rule.  Currently it’s a rule now and not a bylaw and it must have been put into affect in July of 1989. We don’t know specifically what went on in the 89 meeting to make them put this in here, but we have had troubles in the past couple of years complying with the letter of this rule. For example, we had money in a reserve account to get a truck replaced and in the year of replacement the staff came to us with a great opportunity to buy a used truck in which they only had a week to make a decision.  When an opportunity of this type presents itself, we do not have the time to authorize this expenditure and follow the letter of this rule. There have been other times that we have honestly forgotten about this rule, we failed to remember it was there, which leads  to why we need to talk about how to make it easier to authorize expenditures and stay within the boundaries of this rule. We now have another opportunity to replace another truck that is due for replacement this year, which we have had the money in reserve for sometime, and it is an ideal time to buy vehicles because the prices are so low, but by the time you find the vehicle and then follow this rule to authorize the expenditure for this truck you are looking at increasing the process time by two to three months and that is very clumsy.  What I am looking for is a way to comply with the spirit of this rule and not be locked into a dollar amount.  The way I’m thinking is, that in October of every year, we examine the upcoming year’s renovation and replacement accounts and go ahead and make a motion to authorize these reserve account expenditures to be used for the next year if required.  This would give our membership plenty of opportunity to look at these expenditures and make comments or ask questions. I believe what has happened over the years is our financial management and planning is now more sophisticated than 1989, and our renovation accounts are more extensive and we actively manage them and constantly have to adjust the current years budget which forces us to adjust the next years budget.  This is what I have been thinking so now I am asking the board to discuss how they feel about this. Should we change it, Leave it alone, Put a higher dollar amount on it, what do you think?
Scott: From my viewpoint I wonder why they created this.  The two pieces in my mind, I believe in October, and I did not put that in there, the board should authorize reserve expenditures that come up, what that doesn’t address is the $4,700 for the air-conditioner repair and backhoe repair that was $12,000 that really kicked this off.  The $12,000 was the highest I had seen and is the reason I used $15,000. By approving the 2009 expenditures in October and having the cap of $15,000 takes care of the problem and allows us to handle emergencies.
Roger: I like the Idea of us approving the expenditures a year out. That does not mean that we would actually make a purchase. We would authorize it but we would not have to approve it until it came up. It would give the membership the time to look into the reserve items and we could read it into the record.
Jim McCann: I have two things, first the third paragraph the last sentence states that “and after due consideration of members’ comments, the Board shall make its final decision” I think you have to change the word final and leave it off in order for this to be clean. The other objections that a lot of people have with our existing bylaws and rules are that they are too subjective and vague and I think that “expenditure deemed in immediate need” may fall into that category. What I don’t understand is why not simply change the rule to say $15,000 and use the procedure that you’re talking about right now and just eliminate the paragraph at the end so that you don’t have to deal with that?
David: Are you talking about the $5000 at the top?
Jim: Exactly
David: that $5000 on the top is setting up the lower limit for the items that go into the reserve not necessarily the expenditures as your letting money loose.
Roger: There is no dollar thresh hold for board approval as it exists now.
David: Basically what that’s saying is that for an Item to be in the reserves its cost has to exceed $5,000.
Jim: So the $5,000 has nothing to do with the approval process, so based on that we would have to approve anything else beyond that?
Roger: Yes, that’s how we interpret this rule and it’s too restrictive.
David: I think that the idea of approving the expenditures from the reserve, in concept well in advance, is a good Idea.  It allows people to come up and be heard before the actual expenditure occurs, but I still think that we need to have the capability to make the emergency or immediate need repairs like we have had in the past.  We had one this year that, based on the timing of it, you could not fit it into having the repair done, paying for it, having it published, going through two meetings and still get it done.  I think it is combination of the two.
Ray;   I believe it is a good combination of the two and another thing to keep in mind that this is not a blanket authorization to buy. 
Roger:  I have tried to look at this rule from my perspective as a Board member as well a non board member.  I don’t want a board to be able to helter skelter move money from one reserve line-item to another line-item for a different purpose. For example, we have money for cleaning out the containment site B in reserve, and I don’t want them to use it for building the new deck.  I would like to see the board be able to maneuver within a category of an expense.  For example, money for a ¾ ton truck when it makes more sense to buy a 1 ton truck. I think that is still within the category of that expense. I do not want to see the board impeded.  I am looking for the language to allow that latitude.  Glenn, do you feel these two concepts, we have discussed, will work for you.
Glenn:  Basically yes.
Conversation Ensues
Roger: Let me ask you all. Can we come up with a motion, tonight, that announces our INTENTIONS to authorize the renovation and replacement account items that are scheduled for 2009 expenditures as well as the remainder of 2008, and the revised language of the rule and get the time clock started on that and continue to work on the language of the rule.  We are not approving any expenditures we are just authorizing those actions.
Action: David motions that we would intend to expend the reserved funds for those items which were scheduled to be replaced in the year 2008 that were not purchased 2009 as identified in the reserve study, and those items are; a 1 ton dump truck, a ¾ ton Pickup, and the Morning Glory. Scott seconds
Roger:  any further discussions?
David: The only thing I would add is that we have mentioned before is Containment site B which we are not planning on expending in 2008.
Roger: We could begin studying it in 2009, if we were going to do it in 2010. I would like to include it in there even though we don’t have to do it.
David: We shouldn’t do it because it’s still fuzzy. I disagree with putting it in there.
Conversation Ensues
Motion Carries

Roger:  Now what about the language of the rule.
David: Following up on Jim’s comment with regard’s to the last statement of the current rule, the section that says Procurement. If you scratch out the last four words “make its final decision” and replace it with “be empowered to decide on the expenditure”., so the entire statement says --
“Procurement:  At the end of the second Board meeting, following publication, and after due consideration of members’ comments, the Board shall be empowered to decide on the expenditure.”
Roger: What about the $15000 or less?
David: I’m Ok with that; I don’t think it should be higher than that.
Scott: I will make the motion to change the existing renovation and replacement account rule under Procurement to say;
Procurement:  At the end of the second Board meeting, following publication, and after due consideration of members’ comments, the Board shall be empowered to decide on the expenditure.”
And add the additional statement; 
If the expenditure is less than $15,000: Board may elect to proceed with the purchase or expenditure if deemed an immediate need.  Notification of the expenditure(s) must be included in the meeting minutes and published in the Holiday Times.
David Seconds
Action:
Roger: As our rules state we will suspend discussions on this until subsequent meetings.

Rule Changes from Last meeting
Roger: If you all will remember, Glenn gave us a document last meeting that had three rule changes.   Glenn and I discussed this and we already have a bylaw that says exactly that, which in my revision of the bylaws is Page 10, Section 2 C. Violations - Suspensions. The second one Glenn is going to be run by legal counsel in January and then we will consider that one in a bylaw change in the annual meeting.

Heneghan & Associates work orders
Roger: This is a carry over from at least 2 meetings. Glenn would you explain what we are looking at here
Glenn: the first one is the $20,500 is to provide preliminary and final design engineering service, develop construction documents and provide bidding/award assistance for the outfall pipe repair project as outlined in the DCEO Grant Award. The preliminary and final design engineering and bidding/award assistance services will be provided for a fixed fee of $14,000. The Construction documents will be provided for a fixed fee of $6,500. That is covered in the DCEO Grant.
The second one for $19,000 is the one we had the problem with and that one provides construction administration and construction observation services for the outfall pipe during repair which was estimated at $19,000.  The construction administration and construction observation services will now be provided on a time-and-material basis at a standard man-hour/expense rates with an estimated fee of $19,000. 
The last one is for monitoring after the outfall pipe is complete.  They will provide 2 years of monitoring of the outfall pipe (once per year) which includes the initial set-up of control point to be monitored (no more than 4 points per 50-feet) for the outfall pipe repair project as outlined in the DCEO Grant Award. The outfall pipe monitoring services will be provided for a fixed fee of $9000.
Roger:  Was that $9,000 a separate line item in the Grant?
Glenn: It was part of the $41,000.
Roger: This now separates them out into three manageable work orders for you Scott?  No more confusion with it?
Scott: Yes it does for me, but just so we are all clear on this,  the $20,500 is for services already performed and they will be paid when we get the DCEO Grant, however if we don’t get the DCEO grant, by signing this we are on the hook for the $20,500.
Roger: that would be my understanding.
Glenn: Yes.
Roger: There are some things about the $19,000 I do not like and before I sign it I want the $19,000 crossed out and his hourly rate times the number of hours he estimates it will take. He can estimate his hours times his rate and it will probably go to $19,000 but I want that hourly rate that we are going to pay, on the work order.
Glenn:  Yes sir.
Jim: Have we asked them for a not to exceed dollar figure?
Roger: The problem is its not to exceed, its $19,000 and they wrote the Grant Request. The discrepancy that we have is that I believed the $19000 line item in the Grant Request included a whole bunch of over head expenses for us, Audit fees, Glenn’s times, etc. They decided in the engineering firm that they were going to latch on to the entire amount which is a grant line item.
Conversation Ensues
Jim: I’m behind on this but there is a line that says “By signing this work order you guarantee to make full payment prior to release of plats, plans, etc. unless agreed to in writing prior to commencement of work. Now even though this is an estimate doesn’t that preclude what you just said?
Roger: I don’t like what I see in this and I have not studied it like you have Jim, but if we have a time and material work order with them and we don’t call them to trigger it then we don’t pay anything. I want an hourly rate.
Conversation Ensues
Roger: I am going to work again with Glenn on these work orders because I don’t like some of the language on it and we are going to put in writing what we want to see.

New Business
Jim Bartlett Request: Dancing with the stars
Don Austin Reads

Action: Not a paid event, deferred to Social Committee, no Board approval is needed.

Foreclosures
 405 West View $663.02
Action: Scott Motions to approve, Ray Seconds
Motion Carries

1090 Barbados $663.02
Action: David motions to approve, Ray Seconds
Motion Carries

Roger:  I want to point out the amounts shown and note it is a real credit to the staff in accounts receivables. It’s really good for the state of the economy and I would like to commend the staff.

Morning Glory Repair
Roger: Our intention is to put a 24” reinforced concrete collar on the top of the Morning Glory to prevent water from entering.  This collar will do three things for us.  One, it will, keep the Morning Glory pipe dry and keep us from having to lower the lake for the repair. Two, it will raise the lake to the level it should be and once was.  Three, it will preserve the life of the Morning Glory by keeping it and the gate dry. The 24” was derived by looking at the high water mark recorded in 1981. This level also coincides with the rip rap on the damn.  There will be a debris and brush guard placed on the top. The top needs to stay open and ventilated, so we can raise the gate to lower the lake, it has to have air to make that work.  Secondly it needs to be open on both ends to have any work done.  Glenn talked to us about wanting to get this done now. Because of the time frame for this we have no way to communicate lowering of the lake to the members and getting boats stuck, Glenn wants to try to do it without lowering the lake,  He would like to see about 6” below and it’s at 3” now.  The expenditure will come out of the Morning Glory reserve account and hopefully the DCEO funds will be here before we have to do that.   We have a bid for $2,900. 
Conversation Ensues
Roger:  We wanted to wait until the DCEO fund showed up in November but it didn’t so because the community already voted on reserve funds for the Morning Glory we are going to take it out of there. By Putting the Collar on we are guaranteed to have a dry pipe and we can do this as soon as the weather breaks.  We want to authorize to do the Collar and the Debris guard that will be made out of rebar.
Action: Ray motions that we authorize expend the $2,900, to install the collar and $500 to complete the Rebar debris guard with the use of Holishore staff.   Scott Seconds
Motion Carries

Open Floor
Laura Scaturro 1716: I would like to offer my services to get the news out about the morning glory and how it’s misunderstood. As you know I write an article for the Edwardsville Intelligencer and I do try to pass out accurate information.
Roger: Did you attend the annual meeting where we showed the model and pictures of the tube and everything?
Laura: I think I did, I pretty much understand how it works; I understand that it has nothing to do with draining the lake.
Roger: I think what I will have you do is work with Glenn on that but you are going to have to use pictures.
Laura: I can do pictures.
Roger: We just can’t afford any more misinformation about that spillway.
David: We do appreciate it.

David motions to adjourn to executive session, Jim seconds
Motion Carries

Meeting adjourns to Executive Session at 9:15 pm

Scott moves to return to Regular Session.  Ray seconds
Motion carries

Don moves we adjourn the meeting.  Dave seconds
Motion carries

Meeting adjourns at 9:55 PM.

 

Minutes submitted by Don Austin Secretary and Kellie Bechtold

 

Action Items

 

Back To Top

Date: December10, 2008

Attendance
Board Members
Present: Roger Groth, Scott Webber, David Decker, Don Austin, Ray Garber,
and Jim McCann
Absent Excused: Derrick Richardson
Quorum Present: Yes

Others Present
Holishor Members Present 11
Glenn Dalton and Kellie Bechtold from Holishor Office

Proceedings
Meeting called to order at 7:30 PM
Pledge of Allegiance Recited

Roger: There will be an executive session after the meeting.

Minutes of November 12, 2008
Action: Ray motions to approve, David seconds
Motion carries

Bills & Salaries
Action: Ray motions to approve, Scott seconds
Ray: I have two questions.  In this month there’s postage for the Holiday Times for November and December, was one late or was one early?
Glenn: We paid it when we were invoiced, it was late.
Ray: A late payment penalty for the IL department of employment.
Glenn:  They sent us a breakout for an employee who pays child support they had it biweekly and we only pay bimonthly so it was fixed.
Motion carries

Transfers of Property
Action: Scott motions to approve, Jim seconds
Motion Carries

Managers Report
Given by Glenn Dalton

Security Report
No action needed

Treasury Report
Given by Dave Decker
Action: Ray motions to approve, Scott seconds
Motion Carries

Correspondence

  • Midway Hamel PTO fund raiser Danielle Fawbush

Read by Don Austin
Action: Discuss in New Business

  • Ski Club Ramp

Read by Don Austin
Introduce Henry Halverson #1829 Vice President
     Monte Thus 6, Show Director 2009
Roger: Glenn, on the plans we have to make the ski landing area, are you copasetic with what they want to do, and there is no consequence with this?
Glenn: About 2 weeks ago Mike came in and we coordinated their plans and I iterated what our part would be and we are in agreement.
Roger: Henry, where are you going to anchor the ski jump if we approve it?
Henry: You know where our docks are normally anchored near the North end, the jump will be in a position straight out from there into the lake and roughly in the center of the lake.
Roger: If we allowed you to do that and it tuned out there were issues with it, how difficult is it to move?
Henry: It is a tremendous challenge to move the jump in and out.  Even with our smaller starter jump it’s about 45 minutes to an hour to get it into place and anchored, because you have to make adjustments so that you’re coming straight down the lake. With a larger jump, it would be very challenging to put that in and out on a time by time basis.
Roger: I wasn’t thinking per use, I was thinking that if the location turned out to be problematic what would be involved in relocating it.
Henry: Only a couple hours work.
Scott: Which direction will the ramp be facing? Are you going towards the lake or the North Property?
Henry: We would be pulling the skiers towards the North end.
Scott: Based on where you have the ramp to where the no-wake buoy line is would you have enough room for a jumper?
Henry: We may be back a little, our docks are more of a reference point, realistically we would be back far enough from the no-wake buoy line to safely make the landing and turn the boat and not go into the no-wake area.
Roger: Monte, in your estimation, how far south into the lake would you need to be to have a safe turning radius?
Monte: Between 100-200 feet. You need more time to set up the approach to the jump than to land.  Once they land we go into our turn.
Ray: Glenn, 2009 is a challenging year budget wise; do you know what the cost is?
Glenn: We are limited from our previous agreement from the board, its going to be less than $500.
Ray: How much bigger is this ramp compared to the smaller one?
Monte: The current one is 8ft wide and 12 ft long, the new one is 14ft wide and 24ft long.
Ray: You mentioned putting a light on this for night, could you put dual lights on it in case one goes out?  I’m just thinking of liability.
Monte: We used yellow flashing lights on the river; I assume we would have to have a white light like we are anchoring a Pontoon boat; we could put that on with a Yellow Flashing light. Each one would have their own battery pack.
Ray: Another question I have is Liability.  I assume that Holiday Shores would be taking on the liability if someone were to use it other than the ski club; can you close it off at night?
Roger: We have to address that issue so others cannot use it?  How does that work?
Monte: The actual surface adjusts on a pivot with a crank so that the whole surface comes out of the water, and then we turn the lights on and we can also lock it.
Ray: Would there be more liability?
Glenn:  There will be no more liability than we currently have. 
David:  There would be additional liability because currently the small one is moved to the side of the lake.  If you leave it in the middle of the lake at all times you’re increasing the risk.
Roger: Let’s run it by the insurance company and see what they say.
Monte: The small jump takes us time to set it up, we do take it over to the side and tie it up. If a big storm comes through it could break loose. The Big Jump would be anchored and I believe it would be safer because it can’t move, then we could leave it in all summer. With it sitting in the middle of that end of the lake the natural traffic flow would go up the East side of the lake and back down the West side.  The traffic would just go around it.
Scott: Technically you’re supposed to be 75ft from the shore line.  How much room is now between the 75ft markers and the jump?
Glenn: We have plenty of room; I don’t think its going to be an issue.  I can get you those measurements Scott.
Ray: Is this something that we want to let the community know about?
Roger:  Henry, when do you need a decision on this from us?
Henry: The reason we are bringing it up now is that we would like to make any modifications that we need to do to get it into a useful shape. I don’t think it has been used for a few years so there may be some minor maintenance that we need to do to get it functioning and equip it with the lights.  We would like to get it into the lake by late April or early May.
Roger: Would January or late January be ok for us to make a decision?
Henry: That will give us plenty of time.
Scott:  Glen, Where is the dredge going to be?
Glenn:  Our plan is start in late March in Captain’s cove.
Conversation ensues  
David: There are two pieces to the request and one is for the landing area. Didn’t you guys already tear your seawall out?
Henry: Yes, we are waiting for maintenance to dig that back so we can build the sand landing area then the sea wall behind the sand.
David: Do we have a time line of when we are going to approach that?
Glenn: This spring.
David: I am not in favor of the ski jump in the middle of the lake; I think throwing that out in the middle is taking that area away from the rest of the membership.  
Roger: The no wake buoys in the North end, they have sat in the same location since we began to dredge, the more we dredged the more to the South we have moved them. Since we’ve dredged the North end to the degree we have, is there a reason that the No Wake Buoys couldn’t be shifted to the North? If we could do that, in essence, create a bigger area for the Ski club but restrict the access to everyone else to the point in the South where we are already restricting access too, that may be a compromise for Dave’s point.
Scott: I’m leaning towards not having that ramp in the middle of the lake, having said that I have always supported the ski club, my kids are in the ski club and it’s a great organization. I have always looked at that north end and thought if we could just buoy that area off it would be a great place for the ski club to set up and practice.
Conversation Ensues
Henry: I want to address Dave’s concern, if we put that jump in it would only take up a 14x26 area not the whole area, no one goes down the middle of the lake and the traffic flow would just go around it. We are not saying that they can’t use the north end of the lake at all. I don’t think that should be an issue.
Don: I would be concerned at night; I want it very adequately lit, I don’t have a problem with the jump being out there because I do not see it poses any more of a problem than the dredge did all summer long. Are you sure there is enough depth there? 
Henry: We have anchored there before, and I can’t stand there. I’m 6ft, so yes, it’s easily 8ft.
Jim:  I can say I am not for doing this at all. I honestly do not think we should put anything out in the lake on semi or permanent basis. 
Conversation Ensues
Roger: Board members, Here is what I would like to do. I want Glenn to contact the insurance company about the premium, I would like to see something that is a little bit more to scale measurements of where this is going to sit compared to docks, and to put something in the Holiday Times.  I believe this project is worthy of a little more fact finding at this time.  I would suggest the Ski club not throw any more money at this project until we have had time analyze all the information.
Don:  I would also like to suggest that while you are waiting on us to make a decision that you consider a plan or design to allow you to move, re-position and anchor more quickly.
Conversation Ensues
Action: 1. Glenn to contact insurance company to check on liability 2.Get an accurate Scale drawing of the relationship of locations with regards to Dredge, dredge pipe, home owner’s docks and Buoys.  3. Put and article in the Holiday times for member’s thoughts and 4. Ski-club to consider a method to be able to make moves and positioning of the ramp, 5. The Board will revisit at the first meeting in January and make the decision in the second meeting in January.

Old Business
Replacement and Renovation Account Rule Change
Scott reads again for 2nd reading.
Action: Bring back for third reading and vote first meeting in January

Allied Waste Fuel Escalation
Roger: In our contract there was a fuel escalation clause that they could renegotiate the rates if the cost of Diesel went over $3.00 a gallon it would go up. It was triggered a few months ago at a rate of 3%.
Jim: The information that I was given was that it would go to $.45 per resident, that was the only charge.
Roger: Now that the price of Diesel is back down I asked Jim to talk to them.  Jim, what did you find out?
Jim: What I found out was that they tried to trigger that charge in the last quarters billing season and it didn’t go through. Now that it’s down we should see a charge for one month on our next bill, after that it will not be applied now that Diesel is below $3.00 per gallon but it is not down to the $2 per gallon where it allow us to renegotiate to reduce the rates. Its $0.45 per month per member, but it will only be applied for one month.  
Glenn: I talked to her today and she said it was going to be for one quarter.
Jim: She told me for one month then it goes back to what it was before, I also asked her to get in touch with you to give us quarterly updates on what they are paying a gallon of fuel charges so if it goes down we can compare it later on. It is substantially cheaper than what it was.
Conversation Ensues
Don: Have you contacted them to see if they could negotiate a flat fuel rate for a period of time?
Jim: Yes I did and no they don’t. They have not been able to negotiate a flat rate on fuel because
it hasn’t been advantageous to the supplier, and now it’s not advantageous for them now that it’s gone down.
Conversation Ensues
Action:  Glen to contact Allied  Waste to be sure it is only a one month charge, get something in the Holiday Times if its going to be a charge for a Month or a Quarter.

New Business
Midway Hamel PTO Fundraiser, Danielle Fawbush
Action: Scott motions to approve waiver of the rental fees, all other fees apply, Jim Seconds
Jim:  Are we going to waive the cleanup fee or are they going to pay it?
Glenn: They will be required pay for Clean up.
Dave:   In recent times for the Ball Room rental, they are required to pay the clean up and Security fees.  It’s just the Ball Room rental fee we waive for these Charity events.
Roger:  Glenn, the $60 Security fee, as we move forward into a new year is that a sufficient amount from a budgetary stand point?
Glenn: That $60 is not on an hourly rate it’s based on a function rate.
Roger: Does that cover the hourly rate?
David: My understanding it is not a fully loaded hourly rate.
Roger: Lets look at rate and get it on the January Agenda; it will not affect this contract or already signed contracts.
Motion Carries

Casino Night
Roger: Jeannie Votruba is chairing the committee; it is a fund raiser to raise funds to go to the clubhouse deck and the board needs to approve it because the Board must approve all fund raisers.
Action: Don motions to approve the casino night, Ray seconds
Motion Carries

Roger:  For the records, the finance committee met last Monday night to look at the 2009 budget. Glenn, staff and the Board will be working with a revised budget for 2009. Since the revenue projections the original 2009 budget were not realistic, we will be operating on a revised reduced budget. Dave would you characterize the finance committees plan for the 2010 budget
David: First I would like to Thank Ray, Glenn and the office staff’s efforts to come up with this 2010 budget proposal. They have identified a balanced budget that the committee reviewed Monday night. This does not have any assessment increase; it continues to use the initiation fees in the operations budget. As a whole the finance committee is in general agreement with this proposal, there were a couple of concerns so it is still a work in process.
Roger: You have a rough draft of the 2010 budget, Glenn handed out a final version and it has quite a few notes. The time table for this is I need you to look at this and we will discuss it in January, if you have any questions between now and then direct them at David or Glenn.
I do have one question.  What’s the history here that the golf tournament endeavor is not a social committee function, why is it a separate financial function.
Gerry Theodore 1346: The golf tournament was the result of two board members who decided that they wanted to have a golf tournament as a fund raiser and the money was to be used in the community and because of that it became a Board sponsored outing. I don’t know why it couldn’t become a social committee item.
Roger: It’s hard to have it as a fundraiser because of the economy, the probability of it being labeled a fundraiser is questionable. I would just assume it should be a social committee function and not a board function.
If we look at 2010 budget and decide that there will be no increased assessments in the budget the chances of that happening in 2011 are pretty slim. 
Dave:  This is a very slim budget as it’s identified for 2010.
Roger; One of the big problems is the amount budgeted for roads. As an example in 2005 we spent 73,000 on roads and this budget has $73,000 budgeted for roads and looking ahead into the future this amount will have to change.
I have asked Glenn to put together a proposal for a 5 year plan on road repair culvert replacement and we put that in the subject for discussion in our annual meeting minutes.
We have all loved the rain for keeping our lake at full pool all summer long but it has significantly undermined our roads and has caused lots of road and culvert damage.  Glenn actually has a pot-hole map and he has already fixed pot-holes twice.  There is also a culvert study which is available in the office.
Don: Also for the records, the board unanimously approved the officers to sign the loan papers for the North Property.
Conversation Ensues
Action: Discuss the Budget at the First January Meeting.

Lake Management Committee Chair
Roger: Scott Webber will now be heading the Lake Management committee. Therefore he will be off the Real-estate committee and I will be heading that now.


Rules and Bylaw Committee Chair
Considering a non board member to chair the committee, Roger to find one

Open Floor
None

Don Motions to adjourn to Executive Session, Scott Seconds.
Motion carries - Regular session adjourns at 9:00pm

Dave Motions to move from Executive Session to Regular Session, Scott seconds.
Motion carries – Executive session adjourns at 10:30pm

Scott moves to adjourn to Regular Session, Dave seconds
Motion carries - Regular session adjourns at 10:30pm

 

Minutes respectfully submitted by Don Austin Secretary and Kellie Bechtold.

Back To Top